Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T17:05:46.079Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Epistemic Subjectivism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 January 2012

Abstract

Epistemic subjectivism, as I am using the term, is a view in the same spirit as relativism, rooted in skepticism about the objectivity or universality of epistemic norms. I explore some ways that we might motivate subjectivism drawing from some common themes in analytic epistemology. Without diagnosing where the arguments go wrong, I argue that the resulting position is untenable.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Boghossian, Paul. 2006. Fear of Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BonJour, Laurence. 1985. The Structure of Empirical Knowledge. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Field, Hartry. 1982. “Realism and Relativism.” Journal of Philosophy 79: 553567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foley, Richard. 1987. The Theory of Epistemic Rationality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, Alvin. 1980. “The Internalist Conception of Justification.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 5: 2751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harman, Gilbert. 1973. Thought. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Harman, Gilbert. 1986. Change in View. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Harman, Gilbert and Thomson, Judith Jarvis. 1996. Moral Relativism and Moral Objectivity. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
James, William. 1897. “The Will to Believe.” Pp. 1333 in James, William, The Will to Believe and Other Essays in Popular Philosophy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kelly, Thomas. 2003. “Epistemic Rationality as Instrumental Rationality: A Critique.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66: 612640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, Philip. 1992. “The Naturalist's Return.” The Philosophical Review. 101: 53114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornblith, Hilary. 1993. “Epistemic Normativity.” Synthese 94: 357376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laudan, Larry. 1990. “Aimless Epistemology?Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 57: 4459.Google Scholar
Luper, Stephen. 2004. “Epistemic Relativism.” Philosophical Issues 14: 271295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lycan, William. 1988. Judgment and Justification. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nozick, Robert. 1993. The Nature of Rationality. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owens, David. 2003. “Does Belief Have an Aim?Philosophical Studies 115: 283305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papineau, David. 1999. “Normativity and Judgement.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society supplementary vol. 73: 1741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, W. V. and Ullian, J. S.. 1978. The Web of Belief. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. 1986. “Reply to Morton White.” Pp. 662665 in Hahn, L. E. and Schilpp, P. A., eds. The Philosophy of W. V. Quine. La Salle: Open Court.Google Scholar
Stich, Stephen. 1998. “Reflective Equilibrium, Analytic Epistemology and the Problem of Cognitive Diversity.” Pp. 95112 in DePaul, Michael and Ramsey, William eds. Rethinking Intuition: The Psychology of Intuition and it Role in Philosophical Inquiry. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Vahid, Hamid. 2004. “Varieties of Epistemic Conservatism.” Synthese 141: 97122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velleman, J. David. 2000. “On the Aim of Belief.” Pp. 244281 in Velleman, David J., The Possibility of Practical Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wedgwood, Ralph. 2002. “The Aim of Belief.” Philosophical Perspectives 16: 267297.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard. 1973. “Deciding to Believe.” Pp. 136151 in Williams, Bernard, Problems of the Self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Roger. 2005. “Epistemic Permissiveness.” Philosophical Perspectives 19: 445459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar