Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T03:43:19.225Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

EPISTEMIC INTERNALISM AND TESTIMONIAL JUSTIFICATION

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 December 2018

Jonathan Egeland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

According to epistemic internalists, facts about justification supervene upon one's internal reasons for believing certain propositions. Epistemic externalists, on the other hand, deny this. More specifically, externalists think that the supervenience base of justification isn't exhausted by one's internal reasons for believing certain propositions. In the last decade, the internalism–externalism debate has made its mark on the epistemology of testimony. The proponent of internalism about the epistemology of testimony claims that a hearer's testimonial justification for believing that p supervenes upon his internal reasons for thinking that the speaker's testimony that p is true. Recently, however, several objections have been raised against this view. In this paper, I present an argument providing intuitive support for internalism about the epistemology of testimony. Moreover, I also defend the argument against three recent objections offered by Stephen Wright in a couple of recent papers. The upshot of my discussion is that external conditions do make an epistemic difference when it comes to our testimonial beliefs, but that they cannot make any difference with respect to their justificatory status – i.e., they are justificationally irrelevant.

Type
Articles
Information
Episteme , Volume 17 , Issue 4 , December 2020 , pp. 458 - 474
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adler, J. 2002. Belief's Own Ethics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alston, W. P. 1989. Epistemic Justification: Essays in the Theory of Knowledge. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Bonjour, L. 1985. The Structure of Empirical Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Burge, T. 2003. ‘Content Preservation.’ Philosophical Review, 103: 457–488.Google Scholar
Casullo, P. 2003. ‘A Priori Justification.’ New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chisholm, R. 1989. Theory of Knowledge. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Coady, C. A. J. 1992. Testimony: A Philosophical Study. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Egeland, J. Forthcoming. ‘The Demon That Makes Us Go Mental: Mentalism Defended.’ Philosophical Studies, 1–18.Google Scholar
Faulkner, P. 2011. Knowledge On Trust. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foley, R. 1993. Working Without a Net: A Study of Egocentric Epistemology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fricker, E. 1994. ‘Against Gullibility.’ In Matilal, B. and Chakrabarti, A. (eds), Knowing From Words, pp. 125–61. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fricker, E. 1995. ‘Critical Notice: Telling and Trusting: Reductionism and Anti-Reductionism in the Epistemology of Testimony.’ Mind, 104(414): 393–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fricker, E. 2006. ‘Testimony and Epistemic Autonomy.’ In Lackey, J. and Sosa, E. (eds), The Epistemology of Testimony, pp. 225–50. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fumerton, R. 2006. ‘The Epistemic Role of Testimony: Internalist and Externalist Perspectives.’ In Lackey, J. and Sosa, E. (eds), The Epistemology of Testimony, pp. 77–92. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerken, M. 2013. ‘Internalism and Externalism in the Epistemology of Testimony.’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 87(3): 532–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gettier, E. L. 1963. ‘Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?’ Analysis, 23(6): 121–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginet, K. 1975. Knowledge, Perception, and Memory. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, A. 1976. ‘Discrimination and Perceptual Knowledge.’ Journal of Philosophy, 73: 771–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, P. 2010. ‘Testimonial Entitlement and the Function of Comprehension.’ In Haddock, A., Millar, A. and Pritchard, D. (eds), Social Epistemology, pp. 148–174. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greco, J. 2005. ‘Justification is Not Internal.’ In Steup, M. and Sosa, E. (eds), Contemporary Debates in Epistemology, pp. 257–69. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Haddock, A., Millar, A. and Pritchard, D. H. (eds) 2009. Epistemic Value. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lackey, J. 2008. Learning from Words: Testimony as a Source of Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehrer, K. 2006. ‘Testimony and Trustworthiness.’ In Lackey, J. and Sosa, E. (eds), The Epistemology of Testimony, pp. 145–59. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehrer, K. and Cohen, S. 1983. ‘Justification, Truth, and Coherence.’ Synthese, 55(2): 191–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipton, P. 2007. ‘Alien Abduction: Inference to the Best Explanation and the Management of Testimony.’ Episteme, 4: 238–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Littlejohn, C. 2009. ‘The Externalist's Demon.’ Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 39(3): 399–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Littlejohn, C. 2012. Justification and the Truth-Connection. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, J. 1997. ‘Testimony, Induction and Folk Psychology.’ Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 75: 163–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madison, B. 2016. ‘Internalism in the Epistemology of Testimony Redux.’ Erkenntnis, 81(4): 741–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madison, B. 2017. ‘Epistemic Value and the New Evil Demon.’ Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 98(1): 89–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malmgren, A.-S. 2006. ‘Is There A Priori Knowledge by Testimony?’ Philosophical Review, 115: 199–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McEvoy, M. 2005. ‘The Internalist Counterexample to Reliabilism.’ Journal of Southwestern Philosophical Society, 21(1): 178–87.Google Scholar
Plantinga, A. 1993. Warrant: The Current Debate. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poston, T. n.d. ‘Internalism and Externalism in Epistemology.’ Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://www.iep.utm.edu/int-ext/.Google Scholar
Pritchard, D. 2012. Epistemological Disjunctivism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pryor, J. 2001. ‘Highlights of Recent Epistemology.’ British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 52(1): 95–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, F. 1999. ‘Social Epistemology.’ In Greco, J. and Sosa, E. (eds), The Blackwell Guide to Epistemology, pp. 354–82. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Schoenfield, M. 2015. ‘Internalism Without Luminosity.’ Philosophical Issues, 25(1): 252–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sepielli, A. Forthcoming. ‘Subjective and Objective Reasons.’ In Star, D. (ed.), Oxford Handbook on Reasons and Normativity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shogenji, T. 2006. ‘A Defense of Reductionism About Testimonial Justification of Beliefs.’ Noûs, 40: 331–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smithies, D. 2015. ‘Why Justification Matters.’ In Henderson, D. and Greco, J. (eds), Epistemic Evaluation: Purposeful Epistemology, pp. 224–44. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smithies, D. Forthcoming. The Epistemic Role of Consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sosa, E. 2010. Knowing Full Well. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Srinivasan, A. 2015. ‘Normativity Without Cartesian Privilege.’ Philosophical Issues, 25(1): 273–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, T. 2007. ‘On Being Justified in One's Head.’ In Timmons, M., Greco, J. and Mele, A. (eds), Rationality and the Good: Critical Essays on the Ethics and Epistemology of Robert Audi, pp. 106–22. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, S. 2016a. ‘Circular Testimony.’ Philosophical Studies, 173(8): 2029–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, S. 2016b. ‘Internalism and the Epistemology of Testimony.’ Erkenntnis, 81(1): 69–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar