Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T22:59:09.896Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What promotes and inhibits cooperation in mental health care across disciplines, services and service sectors? A qualitative study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 August 2011

A. Bramesfeld ,
C. Ungewitter ,
D. Böttger ,
J. El Jurdi ,
C. Losert  and
R. Kilian
A. Bramesfeld*
Affiliation:
Psychiatric Clinic, University of Leipzig, Germany Department of Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health System Research, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
C. Ungewitter
Affiliation:
Psychiatric Clinic, University of Leipzig, Germany
D. Böttger
Affiliation:
Psychiatric Clinic, University of Leipzig, Germany
J. El Jurdi
Affiliation:
Psychiatric Department, General Hospital, Eisenhüttenstadt, Germany
C. Losert
Affiliation:
Psychiatric Department II, University of Ulm, BKH Günzburg, Germany
R. Kilian
Affiliation:
Psychiatric Department II, University of Ulm, BKH Günzburg, Germany
*
*Address for correspondence: A. Bramesfeld, Department of Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health System Research, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany. (Email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Aims.

To explore the practice of cooperation in mental health care across services and identify conditions that promote and inhibit cooperation.

Methods.

Focus groups with relevant service providers were conducted in four exemplary regions in Germany (rural/urban and East/West). The discussions were content analysed.

Results.

Seven central categories were deduced: (1) involved service providers, (2) comprehension, (3) reasons, (4) instruments for cooperation, (5) promoting and inhibiting conditions, (6) interdisciplinarity, and (7) regional and personal networks. Cooperation is practiced in networks, rather than defined relations. Who is involved in cooperation depends on patients/clients needs and may vary from case to case. Service providers do not have theoretical concepts of cooperation. Cooperation relies not only on personal contacts and knowledge between services but also on time, financial reimbursement and the social capital of the environment. In particular, cooperation with physicians was considered to be difficult by non-medical professionals. Physician's role models do not seem to include cooperation with other disciplines as a core task.

Conclusions.

To improve cooperation, regional and sustainable mental health networks have to be systematically implemented by providing leadership, time and reimbursement for network meetings. Interdisciplinary cooperation practice should be part of the curricula of medical students and residents in psychiatry.

Keywords

collaborationcontinuity of caremental health servicesnetworkspsychiatryquality of care
Type
Original Articles
Information
Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences , Volume 21 , Issue 1 , March 2012 , pp. 63 - 72
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adair, C, McDougall, G, Mitton, C, Joyce, A, Wild, T, Gordon, A, Costigan, N, Kowalsky, L, Pasmeny, G, Beckie, A (2005). Continuity of care and health outcomes among persons with severe mental illness. Psychiatric Services 56, 1061–1069.Google Scholar
Armbruster, J, Schulte-Kemna, G, Kluza, R (2006). Personenzentrierte Organisation psychiatrischer Hilfen als Herausforderung für die Träger. In Kommunale Steuerung und Vernetzung im Gemeindepsychiatrischen Verbung (ed. Armbruster, J.), pp. 77–86. Psychiatrie-Verlag: Bonn.Google Scholar
Bachrach, L (1981). Continuity of care for chronic mental patients: a conceptual analysis. American Journal of Psychiatry 138, 1449–1456.Google Scholar
Battams, S, Baum, F (2010). What policies and policy processes are needed to ensure that people with psychiatric disabilities have access to appropriate housing? Social Science and Medicine 70, 1026–1034.Google Scholar
Bauer, M, Kunze, H, von Cranach, M, Fritze, J, Becker, T (2001). Psychiatric reform in Germany. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 104 (Suppl. 410), 27–34.Google Scholar
Bramesfeld, A (2003). Wie gemeindenah ist die psychiatrische Versorgung in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland? Psychiatrische Praxis 30, 256–265.Google Scholar
Arbeitslose und Arbeitslosenquoten nach Ländern. Jahresdurchschnitte 2003 und 2004 – Bundesagentur für Arbeit (http://www.bagbbw.de). Accessed 15 September 2007.Google Scholar
Charmaz, K (2007). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Sage: Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar
Crompton, D, Groves, A, McGrath, J (2010). What can we do to reduce the burden of avoidable deaths in those with serious mental illness? Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale 19, 4–7.Google Scholar
Dewa, C, Hoch, J, Goerin, P (2001). Using financial incentives to promote shared mental health care. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry 46, 488–495.Google Scholar
Gensichen, J, Beyer, M, Muth, C, Gerlach, F, Von Korff, M, Ormel, J (2006). Case management to improve major depression in primary health care: a systematic review. Psychological Medicine 36, 7–14.Google Scholar
Haggerty, J, Reid, R, Freeman, G, Starfield, B, Adair, C, McKendry, R (2003). Continuity of care: a multidisciplinary review. British Medical Journal 327, 1219–1221.Google Scholar
Koekkoek, B, van Meijel, B, Schene, A, Hutschemaekers, G (2009). Problems in psychiatric care of ‘difficult patients’: a Delphi-study. Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale 18, 323–330.Google Scholar
Laditka, S, Jenkins, C (2000). Enhancing inter-network cooperation among organizations providing mental health services to older people. Administration and Policy in Mental Health 28, 75–89.Google Scholar
Lasker, R, Weiss, E, Miller, R (2001). Promoting collaborations that improve health. Education for Health 14, 163–172.Google Scholar
McKee, M, Delnoij, D, Brand, H (2004). Prevention and public health in social health insurance systems. In Social Health Insurance in Western Europe (ed. Saltman, R. et al. ), pp. 267–280. Open University Press: London.Google Scholar
Mitchell, PF (2009). A discourse analysis on how service providers in non-medical primary health and social care services understand their roles in mental health care. Social Science and Medicine 68, 1213–1220.Google Scholar
Mitton, C, Adair, C, McDougall, G, Marcoux, G (2005). Continuity of care and health care costs among persons with severe mental illness. Psychiatric Services 56, 1070–1076.Google Scholar
Plochg, T, Delnoij, D, Hoogedoorn, N, Klazinga, N (2006). Collaborating while competing? The sustainability of community-based integrated care initiatives through a health partnership. BMC Health Services Research 6, 37.Google Scholar
Rosenheck, R, Morrissey, J, Lam, J, Calloway, M, Stolar, M, Johnsen, M, Randolph, F, Blasinsky, M, Goldman, H (2001). Service delivery and community: social capital, service systems integration, and outcomes among homeless persons with severe mental illness. Health Services Research 36, 691–710.Google Scholar
Schmidt-Michel, PO, Kuhn, F, Bergmann, F (2008). Integrated care as decreed by German law fails for psychiatry. Psychiatrische Praxis 35, 57–59.Google Scholar
Scott, C, Hofmeyer, A (2007). Networks and social capital: a relational approach to primary healthcare reform. Health Research Policy and Systems 5, 9.Google Scholar
Sommerseth, R, Dysvik, E (2008). Health professionals' experiences of person-centered collaboration in mental health care. Journal of Patient Preference and Adherence 2, 259–269.Google Scholar
Strauss, A, Corbin, J (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research. Techniques and Procedures for Development Grounded Theory. Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar
Tansella, M, Thornicroft, G (1998). A conceptual framework for mental health services: the matrix model. Psychological Medicine 28, 503–508.Google Scholar
Weinmann, S, Puschner, B, Becker, T (2009). Innovative Versorgungsstrukturen in der Behandlung von Menschen mit Schizophrenie in Deutschland. Nervenarzt 80, 33–39.Google Scholar
WHO, European Ministerial Conference on Mental Health (2005). Mental Health Declaration for Europe. Facing the Challenges, Building Solutions. EUR/04/5047810/6, Helsinki, Finland.Google Scholar
WHO/OMS (2001). Rapport sur la santé dans le monde 2001: La santé mentale: Nouvelle conception, nouveaux éspoirs. Organisation Mondial de la Santé: Genève.Google Scholar