Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-09T23:06:36.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What is a systematic review?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 May 2011

Andrea Cipriani  and
Corrado Barbui
Andrea Cipriani*
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine and Public Health, Section of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology, University of Verona
Corrado Barbui
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine and Public Health, Section of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology, University of Verona
*
Address for correspondence: Dr. A. Cipriani, Department of Medicine and Public Health, Section of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology, University of Verona, Piazzale L.A. Scuro, 10 - 37134 Verona, Italy. Fax:+39 045-585871 E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Starting from this issue of Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale a new Section, called ABC of Methodology, will regularly cover methodological aspects related to the design, conduct, reporting and interpretation of clinical and epidemiological studies. We hope that these articles will help develop a more critical attitude towards research findings published in the international literature and, additionally, we wish to help promote the implementation of original research projects with higher standards in terms of design, conduct and reporting.

Keywords

systematic reviewmeta-analysismethodsstatistics.
Type
ABC of Methodology
Information
Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences , Volume 15 , Issue 3 , September 2006 , pp. 174 - 175
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Guyatt, G.H., Haynes, R.B., Jaeschke, R.Z., Cook, D.J., Green, L., Naylor, C.D., Wilson, M.C. & Richardson, W.S. for the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. (2000). Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: XXV. Evidence-Based Medicine: Principles for Applying the Users' Guides to Patient Care. Journal of American Medical Association 284, 1290–1296. (Free full text at http://jama.ama-assn.org/).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moher, D., Cook, D.J., Eastwood, S., Olkin, I., Rennie, D. & Stroup, D.F. (1999). Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses. Lancet 354, 1896–1900.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mulrow, C.D. (1994). Rationale for systematic reviews. British Medical Journal 309, 597–599. (Free full text at http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, S.G. & Higgins, J.P.T. (2005). Can meta-analysis help target interventions at individuals most likely to benefit? Lancet 365, 341–346.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whittington, C.J., Kendall, T., Fonagy, P., Cottrell, D., Cotgrove, A. & Boddington, E. (2004). Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in childhood depression: systematic review of published versus unpublished data. Lancet 363, 1341–1345.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed