Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T04:31:59.545Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

What have we learnt from 40 years of research on Intensive Case Management?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 May 2011

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The aims of the Editorial are to summarise what we know for certain from clinical trials of Intensive Case Management, and to highlight lessons for clinicians and researchers. I will upon two systematic reviews of trials of Intensive Case Management versus standard care or low intensity case management. Both incorporated a meta-regression which examined the effect of fidelity to the Assertive Community Treatment model on outcome. The effectiveness of Intensive Case Management was limited to improving patient satisfaction and reducing attrition. Intensive Case Management teams organised according to the Assertive Community Treatment model offered the additional benefit of reducing days in hospital, but only when the team's clients had been high users of hospital care over the previous 12 months. Four important lessons can be drawn: a) Changes to the process of care tend to affect process variables, not outcome variables. b) Complex interventions must be defined meticulously in clear terminology. c) Researchers must demonstrate that complex interventions have been properly implemented in clinical trials. d) It is important to remember that in a clinical trial a successful outcome is determined as much by the control group as by the intervention.

Type
Editorials
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

References

REFERENCES

Bond, G., Drake, R., Mueser, K. & Latimer, E. (2001). Assertive community treatment for people with severe mental illness: critical ingredients and impact on patients. Disease Management and Health Outcomes 9, 141159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, T., Fioritti, A., Holloway, F., Malm, U. & Rossler, W (2001). Case management and assertive community treatment in Europe. Psychiatric Services 52, 631636.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burns, T., Catty, J., Lockwood, L., Roberts, C. & Marshall, M. (2007). Use of intensive case management to reduce time in hospital in people with severe mental illness: systematic review and meta-regression. British Medical Journal Aug 18, 335(7615)-336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department of Health. (1999). A National Service Framework for Mental Health. Department of Health: London.Google Scholar
Higgins, J. & Green, S. (Eds.) (2005). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 4.2.5 [updated May 2005]. Wiley & Sons, Ltd: Chichester (UK).Google Scholar
Killaspy, H., Bebbington, P., Blizard, R., Johnson, S., Nolan, F., Pilling, S. & King, M. (2006). The REACT study: randomised evaluation of assertive community treatment in north London. British Medical Journal 332, 815820.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGrew, J., Bond, G., Dietzen, L. & Salyers, M. (1994). Measuring the fidelity of implementation of a mental health program model. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 62, 670678.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed