Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T17:22:01.172Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Validation of the Italian version of the Functioning Assessment Short Test (FAST) for bipolar disorder

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2012

A. Barbato ,
L. Bossini ,
S. Calugi ,
B. D'Avanzo ,
A. Fagiolini ,
D. Koukouna ,
A. Parabiaghi ,
F. Rapisarda ,
P. Rucci  and
M. Vallarino
A. Barbato*
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Epidemiology and Social Psychiatry, Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research, Milan, Italy
L. Bossini
Affiliation:
Department of Mental Health and Molecular Medicine, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
S. Calugi
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine and Public Health, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
B. D'Avanzo
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Epidemiology and Social Psychiatry, Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research, Milan, Italy
A. Fagiolini
Affiliation:
Department of Mental Health and Molecular Medicine, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
D. Koukouna
Affiliation:
Department of Mental Health and Molecular Medicine, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
A. Parabiaghi
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Epidemiology and Social Psychiatry, Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research, Milan, Italy
F. Rapisarda
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Epidemiology and Social Psychiatry, Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research, Milan, Italy
P. Rucci
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine and Public Health, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
M. Vallarino
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Epidemiology and Social Psychiatry, Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research, Milan, Italy
*
*Address for correspondence: Dr A. Barbato, Laboratory of Epidemiology and Social Psychiatry, Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research, Via La Masa 19, 20156 Milano, Italy. (Email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Aim.

The Functioning Assessment Short Test (FAST) is a useful instrument for the assessment of overall functioning of people with bipolar disorder, showing good psychometric properties. The aim of this study is to validate the Italian version of FAST.

Methods.

Translation and back-translation of the original FAST Spanish version were performed. Participants with bipolar disorder (n = 132) and healthy controls (n = 132) completed the FAST as a part of an assessment package including the Montgomery–Asberg Depression Rating Scale and the Young Mania Rating Scale. Internal consistency, inter-rater reliability, construct and discriminant validity were assessed.

Results.

The FAST Italian version showed good internal consistency, inter-rater reliability and discriminant validity. The cut-off discriminating patients from controls was 15, with a sensitivity of 0.79 and a specificity of 0.80. Principal component analysis with oblique rotation showed factor loadings consistent with the a priori structure of the instrument.

Conclusions.

This study confirmed the psychometric properties of FAST and extended its generalization and validity to the Italian population.

Keywords

Bipolar disorderdiagnostic techniques and proceduresfunctional assessmentvalidation studies
Type
Instruments
Information
Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences , Volume 22 , Issue 2 , June 2013 , pp. 187 - 194
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berk, M, Ng, F, Wang, WV, Calabrese, JR, Mitchell, PB, Malhi, GS, Tohen, M (2008). The empirical redefinition of the psychometric criteria for remission in bipolar disorder. Journal of Affective Disorders 106, 153–158.Google Scholar
Cacilhas, AA, Vieira Da Silva Magalhães, P, Cereser, KM, Walz, JC, Weyne, F, Rosa, AR, Vieta, E, Kapczinski, F (2009). Validity of a short functioning test (FAST) in Brazilian outpatients with bipolar disorder. Value in Health 12, 624–627.Google Scholar
Chengappa, KN, Baker, RW, Shao, L, Yatham, LN, Tohen, M, Gershon, S, Kupfer, DJ (2003). Rates of response, euthymia and remission in two placebo-controlled olanzapine trials for bipolar mania. Bipolar Disorders 5, 1–5.Google Scholar
Hawley, CJ, Gale, TM, Sivakumaran, T (2002). Defining remission by cut off score on the MADRS: selecting the optimal value. Journal of Affective Disorders 72, 177–184.Google Scholar
Huxley, N, Baldessarini, RJ (2007). Disability and its treatment in bipolar disorder patients. Bipolar Disorders 9, 183–196.Google Scholar
Jolliffe, IT (1986). Principal Component Analysis. Springer-Verlag: New York.Google Scholar
MacQueen, GM, Young, LT, Joffe, RT (2001). A review of psychosocial outcome in patients with bipolar disorder. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 103, 163–170.Google Scholar
Montgomery, SA, Asberg, M (1979). A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change. British Journal of Psychiatry 134, 382–389.Google Scholar
Rosa, AR, Gonzalez-Ortega, I, Gonzalez-Pinto, A, Echeburua, E, Comes, M, Martinez-Aran, A, Ugarte, A, Fernandez, M, Vieta, E (2012). One-year psychosocial functioning in patients in the early vs. late stage of bipolar disorder. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 125, 335–341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosa, AR, Sanchez-Moreno, J, Martinez-Aran, A, Salamero, M, Torrent, C, Reinares, M, Comes, M, Colom, F, Van Riel, W, Ayuso-Mateos, JL, Kapczinski, F, Vieta, E (2007). Validity and reliability of the Functioning Assessment Short Test (FAST) in bipolar disorder. Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health 3, 5.Google Scholar
Rosa, AR, Sanchez-Moreno, J, Martinez-Aran, A, van Riel, WG, Bonnin Roig, C, Ayuso-Mateos, JL, Ferrier, N, Kapczinski, F, Vieta, E (2008). Prueba Breve de Evaluación del Funcionamiento. Cibersam: Barcelona.Google Scholar
Rosen, A, Hadzi-Pavlovic, D, Parker, G (1989). The life skills profile: a measure assessing function and disability in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin 15, 325–337.Google Scholar
Ruggeri, M, Tansella, M (2012). People centred mental health care. The interplay between the individual perspective and the broader health care context. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences 21, 125–129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanchez-Moreno, J, Martinez-Aran, A, Tabares-Seisdedos, R, Torrent, C, Vieta, E, Ayuso-Mateos, JL (2009). Functioning and disability in bipolar disorder: an extensive review. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics 78, 285–297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schooler, NR, Hogarty, GE, Weissman, MM (1979). Social adjustment scale II (SAS II). In Resource Materials for Community Mental Health Evaluators (ed. Hargreaves, WA, Attkisson, CC, Sorenson, JE) publication no. (ADM) 79–328. Department of Health, Education and Welfare: Washington, USA.Google Scholar
Smith, DJ, Griffith, E, Poole, R, di Florio, A, Barnes, E, Kelly, MJ, Craddock, N, Hood, Simpson S. (2011). Beating Bipolar: exploratory trial of a novel internet-based psychoeducational treatment for bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disorders 13, 571–557.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swaine-Verdier, A, Doward, LC, Hagell, P, Thorsen, H, McKenna, SP (2004). Adapting quality of life instruments. Value in Health 7, Suppl 1, S27–S30.Google Scholar
Ware, JE Jr, Sherbourne, CD (1992). The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care 30, 473–483.Google Scholar
Young, RC, Biggs, JT, Ziegler, VE, Meyer, DA (1978). A rating scale for mania: reliability, validity and sensitivity. British Journal of Psychiatry 133, 429–435.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Barbato Supplementary Material

Test

Download Barbato Supplementary Material(File)
File 32.3 KB