Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T02:50:35.019Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Use of clinical and service indicators to decrease the treatment gap for mental disorders: a global perspective

Part of: Editorials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 April 2011

Shekhar Saxena
Shekhar Saxena*
Affiliation:
Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse, World Health Organization, Geneva (Switzerland)
*
Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse World Health Organization CH-1211, Geneva (Switzerland). E-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Editorial
Information
Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences , Volume 17 , Issue 4 , December 2008 , pp. 267 - 269
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

References

REFERENCES

Kohn, R., Saxena, D., Levav, I. & Saraceno, B. (2000). The treatment gap in mental health care. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 8, 858–864.Google Scholar
Lancet Global Mental Health Group (2007). Scale up services for mental disorders: a call for action. Lancet 370, 1241–1252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Institute for Mental Health (2003). Schizophrenia: Full National Clinical Guidelines on Core Interventions in Primary and Secondary Care. Gaskell and British Psychological Society: London.Google Scholar
Ruggeri, M. (2008). Guidelines for treating mental illness: love them, hate them. Can the SIEP-DIRECT's Project serve in the search for a happy medium? Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale 17(4), 270–277.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruggeri, M., Lora, A. & Semisa, D. on behalf of the SIEP-DIRECT's Group (2008). The SIEP-DIRECT's Project on the discrepancy between routine practice and evidence. An outline of the main findings and the practical implications for the future of community based mental health services. Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale 17(4), 358–367.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saxena, S., van Ommeren, M., Lora, A. & Saraceno, B. (2006). Monitoring of mental health systems and services - comparison of four existing indicator schemes. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 41, 488–497.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saxena, S., Lora, A., van Ommeren, M., Barrett, T., Morris, J. & Saraceno, B. (2007a). WHO's assessment instrument for mental health sys tems: Collecting essential information for policy and service delivery. Psychiatric Services 58(6), 816–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saxena, S., Thornicroft, G., Knapp, M. & Whiteford, H. (2007b). Resources for mental health: scarcity, inequity, and inefficiency. Lancet 370, 878–889.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Semisa, D., Lora, A., Morosini, P. & Ruggeri, M. (2008a). The SIEP-DIRECT's Project on the discrepancy between routine practice and evidence in the treatment of schizophrenia. The design, the indicators, and the methodology of the study (in Italian). Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale 17(4), 278–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornicroft, G. (2007). Most people with mental illness are not treated. Lancet 370, 807–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WHO World Mental Health Consortium (2004). Prevalence, severity and unmet need for treatment of mental disorders in the World Mental Health Organization World Mental Health Surveys. Journal of the American Medical Association 291, 2581–2590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Health Organization (2005a). World Health Organization Assessment Instrument for Mental Health Systems (WHO-AIMS) Version 2.2. World Health Organization: Geneva. Retrieved August 19, 2008, from http://www.who.int/mental_health/evidence/AIMS_WHO_2_2.pdfGoogle Scholar
World Health Organization (2005b). Resource Book on Mental Health, Human Rights and Legislation. WHO: Geneva.Google Scholar