Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T04:29:26.068Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Neuropsychological and neuropsychiatric perspectives on maternal cradling preferences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 October 2011

Jechil S. Sieratzki  and
Bencie Woll
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Objective – To assess competing explanations for the universal preference of mothers to cradle infants on their left side and to propose a relation to hemispheric asymmetry for social attachment and communication behaviour. Methods – A review of observational, experimental, physiological, psychological, neuro-physiological, and neuro-psychological studies, including new findings on the cradling behaviour of mothers with auditory or visual impairments. Results – A significant left-cradling bias is observed in both right- and left-handed mothers which cannot adequately be explained by arguments based on handedness or closer contact to the soothing sound of the maternal heartbeat. Observations of primate behaviour have led to the suggestion that the left-cradling bias may be related to a left visual field (right hemisphere) advantage for monitoring an infant's facial expressions of distress. However, more than just monitoring, cradling subserves the mother's connection with the infant. For that reason, we have suggested that left cradling might be related to a right hemisphere specialisation for emotional communication, i.e. the speech melody, smiles, signals, and stroking which mothers use to interact with their infants. Studies of mother-infant interaction show that the sound of the mother's voice is more soothing when cradling on the left, more stimulating when cradling on the right. Cradling laterality may thus be related to emotional state and behavioural intent. There is also evidence to suggest that left cradling is linked to a special role of the right hemisphere in social attachment behaviour. This function may be disturbed in mothers with postnatal depression who show abnormal right hemisphere activity. Conclusion – Cradling embodies the symbiotic relationship between mother and infant; various lines of evidence support the suggestion that the universal preference of mothers to cradle infants on their left side is related to a right hemisphere dominance for social attachment and communication behaviour.

Keywords

cradlinghandednessauditory impairmentvisual impairment
Type
Other
Information
Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences , Volume 11 , Issue 3 , September 2002 , pp. 170 - 176
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Best, C.T., Womer, J.S. & Queen, H.F. (1994). Hemispheric asymmetries in adults' perception of infant emotional expressions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Human Perception and Performance 20, 751–765.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bettes, B.A. (1988). Maternal depression and motherese: Temporal and international features. Child Development 59, 1089–1096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogren, L.Y. (1984). Side preference in women and men when holding their new-born child: psychological background. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 69, 13–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borod, J.C., Haywood, C.S. & Koff, E. (1997). Neuropsychological aspects of facial asymmetry during emotional expression: a review of the normal adult literature. Neuropsychological Review 7, 41–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Breznitz, Z. & Sherman, T. (1987). Speech patterning of natural discourse of well and depressed mothers and their young children. Child Development 58, 395–400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bundy, R.S. (1979). Effect of infant head position on side preference in adult handling. Infant Behaviour & Development 2, 355–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, R.J., Abercrombie, H., Nitschke, J.B. & Putnam, K. (1999). Regional brain function, emotion and disorders of emotion. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 9, 228–234.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dawson, G., Frey, K., Self, J., Panagiotides, H., Hessl, D., Yamada, E. & Rinaldi, J. (1999). Frontal brain electrical activity in infants of depressed and non-depressed mothers: relation to variations in infant behavior. Development and Psychopathology 11, 589–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeCasper, A.J. & Spence, M.J. (1986). Prenatal maternal speech influences newborns' perception of speech sounds. Infant Behavior & Development 9, 133–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Chateau, P. (1987). Left-side preference in holding and carrying new-born infants. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 75, 283–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Chateau, P. & Andersson, Y. (1976). Left sided preference for holding and carrying newborn infants II: Doll-holding and carrying from 2 to 16 years. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 18, 738–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernandez-Carriba, S., Loeches, A., Morcillo, A. & Hopkins, W.D. (2002). Asymmetry in facial expression of emotions by chimpanzees. Neuropsychologia 40, 1523–1533.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fifer, W.P. & Moon, C.M. (1994). The role of mother's voice in the organization of brain functions in the newborn. Acta Paediatrica, Supplementum 39, 86–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, M.S., Ketter, T.A., Parekh, P.F., Horwitz, B., Herscovitch, P. & Post, R.M. (1995). Brain activity during transient sadness and happiness in healthy women. American Journal of Psychiatry 152, 341–351.Google ScholarPubMed
Harris, L.J., Almerigi, J.B. & Kirsch, E.A. (2000). Side preference in adults for holding infants: contributions of sex and handedness in a test of imagination. Brain and Cognition 43, 246–252.Google Scholar
Hauser, M.D. (1993). Right hemisphere dominance for the production of facial expression in monkeys. Science 261, 475–477.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henry, J.P. (1997). Psychological and physiological responses to stress: the right hemisphere and the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis, an inquiry into problems of human bonding. Acta Physiologica Scandinavica, Supplementum 640, 10–25.Google ScholarPubMed
Jones, N.A., Field, T., Davalos, M. & Pickens, J. (1997). EEG stability in infants/children of depressed mothers. Human Development 28, 59–70.Google ScholarPubMed
Jones, N.A., Field, T. & Davalos, M. (2000). Right frontal EEG asymmetry and lack of empathy in preschool children of depressed mothers. Child Psychiatry and Human Development 30, 189–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaplan, P.S., Bachorowski, J.A. & Zarlengo-Stauss, P. (1999). Childdirected speech produced by mothers with symptoms of depression fails to promote associative learning in 4-months-old infants. Child Development 70, 560–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liotti, M. & Mayberg, H. S. (2001). The role of functional neuroimaging in the neuropsychology of depression. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 23, 121–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lorberbaum, J. P., Newman, J. D., Horwitz, A. R., Dubno, J. R., Lydiard, R. B., Hamner, M. B., Bohning, D. E. & George, M. S. (2002). A potential role for thalamocingulate circuitry in human maternal behaviour. Biological Psychiatry 51, 431–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, M.D., Turabull, O.H. & Kaplan, Solms K.L. (1993). Laterality of cradling in relation to perception and expression of facial affect. Journal of Genetic Psychology 154, 347–352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manning, J.T. & Chamberlain, A.T. (1990). The left side cradling preference in great apes. Animal Behaviour 39, 1224–1227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manning, J.T. & Chamberlain, A.T. (1991). Left-side cradling and brain lateralisation. Ethology and Sociobiology 12, 237–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matheson, E.A. & Tumbull, O.H. (1998). Visual determinants of the leftward cradling bias: a preliminary report. Laterality 3, 283–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmqvist, H. (1975). The effect of heartbeat sound stimulation on the weight development of new-born infants. Child Development 46, 292–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pelaez-Nogueras, M., Field, T.M., Hossain, Z. & Pickens, J. (1996). Depressed mother's touching increases infants' positive affect and attention in still-face interactions. Child Development 67, 1780–1792.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reissland, N. (2000). The cradling bias in relation to pitch of maternal child-directed language. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 18, 179–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reissland, N., Shepherd, J. & Herrera, E. (2002). The pitch of maternal voice: a comparison of mothers suffering from depressed mood and non-depressed mothers reading books to their infants. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 43, 1–7.Google Scholar
Salk, L. (1960). The role of the normal heartbeat sound in the behavior of the newborn infant: implications for mental health. World Mental Health 12, 168–175.Google Scholar
Salk, L. (1973). The role of the heartbeat in relations between mother and infant. Scientific American 228, 24–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sieratzki, J. S. & Woll, B. (1996). Why do mothers cradle babies to the left ? Lancet 347, 1746–1748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sieratzki, J.S., Roy, P.J. & Woll, B. (in press). Left cradling and left ear advantage for emotional speech: listen to the other side too. Laterality.Google Scholar
Todd, B. & Butterworth, G. (1998). Her heart is in the right place: An investigation of the «heartbeat hypothesis» as an explanation of the left side cradling preference in a mother with dextrocardia. Early Development & Parenting 7, 229–233.3.0.CO;2-N>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turnbull, O.H. & Bryson, H.E. (2001). The leftward cradling bias and hemispheric asymmetry for speech prosody. Laterality 6, 21–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turnbull, O.H. & Lucas, M.D. (1996). Is the left cradling preference related to lateral asymmetries in attention? Journal of Genetic Psychology 157, 161–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turnbull, O.H., Rhys-Jones, S.L. & Jackson, A.L. (2001). The leftward cradling bias and prosody: an investigation of cradling preferences in the Deaf community. Journal of Genetic Psychology 162, 178–186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weiland, J.H. & Sperber, Z. (1970). Patterns of mother-infant contact: The significance of lateral preference. Journal of Genetic Psychology 117, 157–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woll, B. & Sieratzki, J.S. (2002). Leftward cradling bias, prosodic speech, and deafness: The Deaf are not dumb. Journal of Genetic Psychology 163, 126–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoshinaga-Itano, C. (1999). Benefits of early intervention for children with hearing loss. Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America 32, 1089–1102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zaidel, D. W. (1996). Left-sided cradling. Lancet 348, 691.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed