Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T16:01:26.402Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Improving the quality of acute inpatient care

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 April 2011

Paul Lelliott  and
Sarah Bleksley
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Over the past ten years, the National Health Service in England has introduced home treatment teams throughout the country. Despite this, and the fact that England now has the fourth lowest number of beds per capita in Europe, no mental health service has been able to dispense with acute admission beds altogether. One unintended consequence of new investment in community alternatives to inpatient care is that the threshold for admission has risen and acute wards now accommodate a patient group that is more severe with regard to levels of disturbance and social disadvantage. This has compounded the challenge of providing high quality inpatient care and repeated national surveys suggest that acute admission wards are the weakest link in the English mental healthcare system. In response to this, the Royal College of Psychiatrists has established an accreditation scheme for acute admission wards. Only 22 of the first 132 wards to have completed the review process so far are considered to be excellent. Although 59 wards (45% of the total) failed to meet one or more essential standard, 43 of these were able to rectify the problem.

Declaration of Interest: None.

Type
Editorials
Information
Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences , Volume 19 , Issue 4 , December 2010 , pp. 287 - 290
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

References

REFERENCES

Department of Health (1999). National Service Framework for Mental Health: Modern Standards and Service Models. Department of Health: London.Google Scholar
Healthcare, Commission (2005). National Audit of Violence (2003–2005). Healthcare Commission: London.Google Scholar
Hill, A. (2008). Psychiatric patients ‘feel lost and unsafe’. The Observer, 29th June 2008. Retrieved July 19, 2010, from http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2008/jun/29/mentalhealth.health3Google Scholar
Lelliott, P., Bennett, H., McGeorge, M. & Turner, T. (2006). Accreditation of in-patient mental health services. Psychiatric Bulletin 30, 361–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mental health Act Commission (2009). MHAC Thirteenth Biennial Report 2007–2009. The Stationery Office: London.Google Scholar
Paton, C., Barnes, T.R.E., Cavanagh, M.R., Taylor, D. & Lelliott, P. (2008). High-dose and combination antipsychotic prescribing in acute adult wards in the UK: the challenges posed by PRN prescribing. British Journal of Psychiatry 192, 435–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Royal College of Psychiatrists (2010). Accreditation for Inpatient Mental Health Services (AIMS) Standards for Inpatient Wards — Working Age Adults: fourth edition. Royal College of Psychiatrists' Centre for Quality Improvement: London. Retrieved July 19, 2010, from http://www.rcpsych.ac.uk/quality/quality,accreditationaudit/aims.aspxGoogle Scholar
Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health (2005). Acute Care 2004: A National Survey of Adult Psychiatric Wards in England. Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health: London.Google Scholar
World Health Organisation (2008). Policies and Practices for Mental Health in Europe — Meeting the Challenges. WHO Regional Office for Europe: Copenhagen.Google Scholar