Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T03:47:11.186Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Function assertive community treatment (FACT) and psychiatric service use in patients diagnosed with severe mental illness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2011

M. Drukker ,
J. Van Os ,
S. Sytema ,
G. Driessen ,
E. Visser  and
Ph. Delespaul
M. Drukker*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience MHeNS, Maastricht University, The Netherlands
J. Van Os
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience MHeNS, Maastricht University, The Netherlands King's Health Partners Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK
S. Sytema
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
G. Driessen
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience MHeNS, Maastricht University, The Netherlands
E. Visser
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
Ph. Delespaul
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience MHeNS, Maastricht University, The Netherlands Integrated Care Division, Mondriaan, South-Limburg, The Netherlands
*
*Address for correspondence: Dr Marjan Drukker, Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, School for Mental Health and NeuroScience MHeNS, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, Vijverdal, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands. (Email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Aim.

Previous work suggests that the Dutch variant of assertive community treatment (ACT), known as Function ACT (FACT), may be effective in increasing symptomatic remission rates when replacing a system of hospital-based care and separate community-based facilities. FACT guidelines propose a different pattern of psychiatric service consumption compared to traditional services, which should result in different costing parameters than care as usual (CAU).

Methods.

South-Limburg FACT patients, identified through the local psychiatric case register, were matched with patients from a non-FACT control region in the North of the Netherlands (NN). Matching was accomplished using propensity scoring including, among others, total and outpatient care consumption. Assessment, as an important ingredient of FACT, was the point of departure of the present analysis.

Results.

FACT patients, compared to CAU, had five more outpatient contacts after the index date. Cost-effectiveness was difficult to assess.

Conclusion.

Implementation of FACT results in measurable changes in mental health care use.

Keywords

Cost effectivenessHealth Services ResearchAssertive Community Treatmentschizophrenia and disorders with psychotic features
Type
Original Articles
Information
Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences , Volume 20 , Issue 3 , September 2011 , pp. 273 - 278
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM IV). American Psychiatric Association: Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Bak, M, Van Os, J, Delespaul, PAEG, De Bie, A, Campo, JÀ, Poddighe, G, Drukker, M (2007). An observational, “real life” trial of the introduction of assertive community treatment in a geographically defined area using clinical rather than service use outcome criteria. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 42, 125–130.Google Scholar
Bond, GR, Drake, RE (2007). Should we adopt the Dutch version of ACT? Commentary on “FACT: a Dutch version of ACT”. Community Mental Health Journal 43, 435–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briggs, A, Claxton, K, Sculpher, M (2007). Decision Modelling for Health Economic Evaluations. Oxford University Press: Oxford.Google Scholar
CCAF (2011). ACT and FACT in the Netherlands. Retrieved 14-3-2011, from http://www.ccaf.nl/ccaf-englishGoogle Scholar
Detsky, AS, Naglie, G, Krahn, MD, Naimark, D, Redelmeier, DA (1997). Primer on medical decision analysis: Part 1 – Getting started. Medical Decision Making 17, 123–125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drukker, M, Bak, MLFJ, Campo, JÀ, Driessen, G, Van Os, J, Delespaul, PAEG (2010). The cumulative needs for care monitor (CNCM), a unique monitoring system in the South of The Netherlands. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 45, 475–485.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drukker, M, Maarschalkerweerd, M, Bak, MLFJ, Driessen, G, Campo, JÀ, De Bie, A, Poddighe, G, Van Os, J, Delespaul, PAEG (2008 a). A real-life observational study to the effectiveness of F-ACT in a Dutch mental health region. BMC Psychiatry 8, 93.Google Scholar
Drukker, M, Van Dillen, K, Bak, MLFJ, Mengelers, R, Van Os, J, Delespaul, PAEG (2008 b). The use of the Camberwell Assessment of Need in treatment: what unmet needs can be met? Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 43, 410–417.Google Scholar
Drukker, M, Van Os, J, Dietvorst, M, Sytema, S, Driessen, G, Delespaul, PAEG (2011). Does monitoring need for care in patients diagnosed with severe mental illness impact on psychiatric service use? Comparison of monitored patients with matched controls. BMC Psychiatry 11, 45.Google Scholar
Grigoletti, L, Amaddeo, F, Grassi, A, Boldrini, M, Chiappelli, M, Percudani, M, Catapano, F, Fiorillo, A, Perris, F, Bacigalupi, M, Albanese, P, Simonetti, S, De Agostini, P, Tansella, M (2010). A predictive model to allocate frequent service users of community-based mental health services to different packages of care. Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale 19, 168–177.Google Scholar
Kessler, RC, Aguilar-Gaxiola, S, Alonso, J, Chatterji, S, Lee, S, Ormel, J, Ustun, TB, Wang, PS (2009). The global burden of mental disorders: an update from the WHO World Mental Health (WMH) surveys. Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale 18, 23–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lasalvia, A, Tansella, M (2010). Acute in-patient care in modern, community-based mental health servi where and how? Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale 19, 275–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lora, A, Bezzi, R, Erlicher, A (2007). Estimating the prevalence of severe mental illness in mental health services in Lombardy (Italy). Community Mental Health Journal 43, 341–357.Google Scholar
Naimark, D, Krahn, MD, Naglie, G, Redelmeier, DA, Detsky, AS (1997). Primer on medical decision analysis: Part 5 – Working with Markov processes. Medical Decision Making 17, 152–159.Google Scholar
SCEM Conference Services (2011). Van bed naar beter in de buurt; reductie van bedden in de ggz. Retrieved 2-3-2011, from http://www.ggznederland.nl/activiteitenkalender/van-bed-naar-beter-pdf-folder-hr.pdf.Google Scholar
Snijders, T, Bosker, R (1999). Multilevel Analysis, an Introduction to Basic and Advanced Modeling. SAGE Publications: London.Google Scholar
Sonnenberg, FA, Beck, JR (1993). Markov models in medical decision making: a practical guide. Medical Decision Making 13, 322–338.Google Scholar
Van Veldhuizen, JR (2007). FACT: a Dutch version of ACT. Community Mental Health Journal 43, 421–433.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed