Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T16:37:52.103Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The weak immunogenicity of Fusobacterium necrophorum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

G. R. Smith ,
Ann Turner ,
L. G. Murray  and
Janet C. Oliphant
G. R. Smith
Affiliation:
Nuffield Laboratories of Comparative Medicine, Institute of Zoology, The Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London NW1 4RY, U.K.
Ann Turner
Affiliation:
Nuffield Laboratories of Comparative Medicine, Institute of Zoology, The Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London NW1 4RY, U.K.
L. G. Murray
Affiliation:
Nuffield Laboratories of Comparative Medicine, Institute of Zoology, The Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London NW1 4RY, U.K.
Janet C. Oliphant
Affiliation:
Nuffield Laboratories of Comparative Medicine, Institute of Zoology, The Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London NW1 4RY, U.K.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Three of four extreme methods of immunization completely failed to protect mice against challenge with the homologous strain of Fusobacterium necrophorum. Unsuccessful vaccines included (1) broth culture killed by mild heat and emulsified with Freund's complete adjuvant, and (2) a homogenate of heavily infected mouse brains, inactivated by mild heat and given in two doses. Also unsuccessful as a method of immunization was the production of a severe subcutaneous infection with F. necrophorum, followed by curative treatment with metronidazole. Slight but significant protection against subcutaneous challenge resulted, however, from two such infections given in rapid succession. It would appear that the main virulence factors of F. necrophorum are onty weakty immunogenic, and the experiments give little encouragement to the prospect of an effective necrobacillosis vaccine.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 95 , Issue 1 , August 1985 , pp. 59 - 68
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

References

REFERENCES

Abe, P. M., Holland, J. W. & Stauffer, L. R. (1978). Immunization of mice against Fusobacterium necrophorum infection by parenteral or oral administration of vaccine. American Journal of Veterinary Research 39, 115–118.Google ScholarPubMed
Ashton, D. G. (1982). [In the] Scientific Report of the Zoological Society of London 1979–1981. Journal of Zoology, London 197, 91–92.Google Scholar
Banting, A. de L., Bellenger, M. & Turpin, M. (1977). Essais de traitement du piétin du mouton avec une préparation à base de sulfate de zinc, associée ou non à la vaccination. Revue de Médecine Vétérinaire 128, 1121–1122, 1125–1131.Google Scholar
Bernard, Y., Boucomont, D., Martain, L. & Vincent, H. (1978). Essai de traitement du piétin des ovins dans le département de la Nièvre. Bulletin Mensuel de la Société Vétérinaire pratique de France 62, 423–436.Google Scholar
Beveridge, W. I. B. (1959). Necrobacillosis, foot-rot etc. (Diseases due to non-sporing anaerobes). In Infectious Diseases of Animals: Diseases due to Bacteria, vol. II, pp. 397–412. London: Butterworth.Google Scholar
Beveridge, W. I. B. (1983). Animal Health in Australia, vol. 4, Bacterial Diseases of Cattle, Sheep and Goats, p. 180. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Animal Health, Australian Government Publishing Service.Google Scholar
Cameron, C. M. & Fuls, W. J. P. (1977). Failure to induce in rabbits effective immunity to a mixed infection of Fusobaclerium necrophorum and Corynebacterium pyogenes with a combined bacterin. Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research 44, 253–256.Google ScholarPubMed
Deacon, A. G., Duerden, B. I. & Holbrook, W. P. (1978). Gas-liquid chromatographic analysis of metabolic products in the identification of Bacteroidaceae of clinical interest. Journal of Medical Microbiology 11, 81–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duerden, B. I. (1983). The Bacteroidaceae: Bacteroides, Fusobacterium and Leptolrichia. In Topley and Wilson's Principles of Bacteriology, Virology and Immunity, 7th ed. vol. 2, Systematic Bacteriology (ed. Parker, M. T. (general editors Sir Graham Wilson. Sir Ashley Miles and M. T. Parker)), pp. 114–130. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Egerton, J. R. & Roberts, D. S. (1971). Vaccination against ovine foot-rot. Journal of Comparative Pathology 81, 179–185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, D. G. & Perkins, F. T. (1954). An improved method for testing the ability of pertussis vaccines to produce agglutinin. Journal of Pathology and Bacteriology 68. 251–257.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garcia, M. M., Dorward, W. J., Alexander, D. C., Magwood, S. E. & McKay, K. A. (1974). Results of a preliminary trial with Sphaerophorus necrophorus toxoids to control liver abscesses in feedlot cattle. Canadian Journal of Comparative Medicine 38, 222–226.Google ScholarPubMed
Hooker, J. M., Smith, G. R. & Milligan, R. A. (1979). Differentiation of Mycoplasma mycoides subsp. mycoides from certain closely related mycoplasmas by mycoplasmaemia and cross-protection testa in mice. Journal of Hygiene 82, 407–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katitch, R. V. (1974). Ėtude comparative sur la valeur prophylactiquc de 2 vaccins contre le piétin du mouton. Bulletin de la Société des Sciences Vétérinaires et de Médicine Comparée de Lyon 76, 263–267.Google Scholar
Katitch, R. V. (1979). Les problèmes d'étiologie et de l'immunoprophylaxic dans le piétin du mouton. Comparative Immunology, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases 2, 55–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katitch, R. V. & Matitch, G. (1977). Étude comparée chez le lapin du pouvoir pathogène de Ristella nodosa et de Spherophorus necrophorus. Effet d'un sérum hyperimmun chez des moutons artificiellement infectés avec Spherophorus necrophorus. Bulletin de la Société des Sciences Vétérinaires et de Médecine Comparée de Lyon 79, 189–195.Google Scholar
Oliphant, J. C., Parsons, R. & Smith, G. R. (1984). Aetiological agents of necrobacillosis in captive wallabies. Research in Veterinary Science 36, 382–384.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prévot, A. R., Turpin, A. & Kaiser, P. (1967). Les Bactéries Anaérobies. Paris: Dunod.Google Scholar
Simon, P. C. & Stovell, P. L. (1969). Diseases of animals associated with Sphaerophorus necrophorus: characteristics of the organism. Veterinary Bulletin 39, 311–315.Google Scholar
Smith, G. R. (1968). Factors affecting bacteriaemia in mice inoculated with Mycoplasma mycoides var. mycoides. Journal of Comparative Pathology 78, 267–274.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, G. R. (1969). Effect of route of vaccination on the immune response of mice to a single dose of heat-killed Mycoplasma mycoides var. mycoides. Journal of Comparative Pathology 79, 255–260.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, G. R., Oliphant, J. C. & Parsons, R. (1984). The pathogenic properties of Fusobacterium and Bacteroides species from wallabies and other sources. Journal of Hygiene 92, 165–175.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turner, A. W., Campbell, A. D. & Dick, A. T. (1935). Recent work on pleuro-pneumonia contagiosa bourn in North Queensland. Australian Veterinary Journal 11, 63–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warner, J. F., Fales, W. H. & Teresa, G. W. (1974). Passive haemagglutination test for determining the immune response of rabbits to Sphaerophorus necrophorus of bovine hepatic abscess origin. American Journal of Veterinary Research 35, 551–554.Google Scholar
Wilson, G. S. & Miles, A. A. (1975). Topley and Wilson's Principles of Bacteriology, Virology and Immunity, 6th ed., pp. 1655–1656. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar