Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T09:54:32.903Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The virulence of salmonella strains for chickens: their excretion by infected chickens

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

H. Williams Smith
Affiliation:
Houghton Poultry Research Station, Houghton, Huntingdon, Cambs. PE17 2DA
J. F. Tucker
Affiliation:
Houghton Poultry Research Station, Houghton, Huntingdon, Cambs. PE17 2DA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Inoculated orally, 16 Salmonella typhimurium strains belonging to 12 phage types varied greatly in their abilityto kill 1-day-old chickens; variation was noted even between strains of the same phage type. Fourteen strains belonging to 11 food poisoning serotypes other than S. typhimurium were practically non-lethal whenexamined in this manner. All of them were lethal by the intramuscular route but some were more so than others. Twowere more lethal by this route than one of the S. typhimurium strains that was highly lethal when given orally.With age, chickens rapidly became resistant to fatal infection with the food poisoning strains; given orally, a S.typhimurium strain killed 79 % of 1-day-old chickens but only 3 % of 2-day-old chickens. Of 2 specific poultrypathogenic strains, one, of S. gallinarum, was lethal by oral inoculation to chickens of all ages but the other, of S. pullorum, was only lethal to very young ones.

Some salmonella strains, such as those of S. infantis and S. menston, were more efficient at infecting and colonizing the alimentary tract of chickens than were the more virulent S. typhimurium strains, the S. gallinarum and S. pullorum strains and a S. cholerae-suis strain.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

References

REFERENCES

Smith, H. Williams (1952). The evaluation of culture media for the isolation of salmonella from faeces. Journal of Hygiene 50, 2136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, H. Williams (1955). Observations on experimental fowl typhoid. Journal of Comparative Pathology 65, 3754.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, H. Williams & Tucker, J. F. (1975 a). The effect of antibiotic therapy on the faecal excretion of Salmonella typhimurium by infected chickens. Journal of Hygiene 75, 275–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, H. Williams & Tucker, J. F. (1975 b). The effect of feeding diets containing permitted antibiotics on the faecal excretion of Salmonella typhiumurium by experimentally infected chickens. Journal of Hygiene 75, 293301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, H. Williams & Tucker, J. F. (1978). The effect of antimicrobial feed additives on the colonization of the alimentary tract of chickens by Salmonella typhimurium. Journal of Hygiene 80, 217–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, H. Williams & Tucker, J. F. (1979). The effect on the virulence and infectivity of Salmonella typhimurium and Salmonella gallinarum of acquiring antibiotic resistance plasmids from organisms that had caused serious outbreaks of disease. Journal of Hygiene 83, 305–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed