Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T14:19:32.252Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Variation of Bacillus anthracis with special reference to the non-capsulated avirulent variant

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

H. P. Chu
H. P. Chu
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Pathology, University of Cambridge
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Normal virulent B. anthracis all possess the genetical potentiality of producing capsules, but the capsule is only produced in vivo or under special cultural conditions suitable for capsule formation, especially in the presence of CO2.

During multiplication the potentially capsulated cells regularly produce a small number of a stable non-capsulated avirulent variant. All laboratory stock cultures of B. anthracis examined were found to contain from 0·14 to 32·4% of this avirulent variant. The variant has also been demonstrated in hair and wool from anthrax endemic areas, which suggests that the dissociation may also occur in nature.

Both the normal potentially capsulated cell and the variant incapable of producing capsules grow on plain agar in air as rough colonies with apparently non-capsulated cells. But when they are grown on serum agar in the presence of CO2, the normal potentially capsulated cell gives rise to a smooth mucoid colony with fully capsulated cells, while the variant still produces a rough colony with non-capsulated cells. If we regard the smooth mucoid colony produced by normal virulent B. anthracis on serum agar in CO2 as the normal colony form of B. anthracis, then the dissociation of the avirulent non-capsulated variant with the rough colony form falls in line with the usual S-R dissociation of other bacteria.

The more widely known variation of B. anthracis, which had long been held as an exception to the usual S-R variation of other bacteria, refers to colonies grown on plain agar in air. This variation is different from the one just described and is not so clear-cut and significant. Its underlying cause is not quite clear except that the chain length of the growth appears to play some part.

A summarized picture showing the whole range of variation in colony appearance and cell structure of B. anthracis is presented.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 50 , Issue 4 , December 1952 , pp. 433 - 444
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1952

References

REFERENCES

Gladstone, G. P. (1946). Brit. J. exp. Path. 27, 394.Google Scholar
Gladstone, G. P. & Fildes, P. (1940). Brit. J. exp. Path. 21, 161.Google Scholar
IVánovics, G. (1937). Zbl. Bakt. 138, 449.Google Scholar
Lison, L. (1935). Arch. biol., Liége, 46, 599.Google Scholar
Munne, V. (1934). 12 th Int. Vet. Congr. 2, 157.Google Scholar
Nungester, W. J. (1929). J. infect. Dis. 44, 73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preisz, H. (1908). Zbl. Bakt. (1. Abt. Orig.), 47, 585.Google Scholar
Preisz, H. (1911). Zbl. Bakt. (1. Abt. Orig.), 58, 510.Google Scholar
Schaeffer, W. (1936). C.R. Soc. biol., Paris, 122, 1178.Google Scholar
Smith, N. R., Gordon, R. E. & Clark, F. E. (1946). Misc. Publ. U.S. Dep. Agric. no. 559.Google Scholar
Stamatin, N. (1934). Arch. Vet. 26, 1.Google Scholar
Stamatin, N. & Stamatin, L. (1936). C.R. Soc. biol., Paris, 122, 491.Google Scholar
Sterne, M. (1937 a). Onderstepoort J. vet. Sci. 8, 271.Google Scholar
Sterne, M. (1937 b). Onderstepoort. J. vet. Sci. 9, 49.Google Scholar
Sterne, M. (1938). Onderstepoort. J. vet. Sci. 10, 245.Google Scholar
Wagner, G. (1920). Zbl. Bakt. (1. Abt. Orig.) 84, 386. Google Scholar