Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T03:24:05.309Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Variation in complement-fixing activity of Rickettsia burneti during egg adaptation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

M. G. P. Stoker
M. G. P. Stoker
Affiliation:
Department of Pathology, University of Cambridge
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. The haemolytic complement-fixation test and the conglutinating complement-absorption test, as well as the agglutination reaction and the antiglobulin sensitization test, have been used to study a change which occurs during egg adaptation of the Christie strain of R. burneti.

2. Antigens were prepared from yolk sacs of the third to the ninth passages inclusive. Irrespective of numbers of rickettsiae, antigens from the third and fourth passage failed to fix complement with homologous (human) antiserum, unless the latter was in very low dilution. From the fifth passage, however, antigens fixed complement with high dilutions of the same antiserum and thus resembled the classical Henzerling strain antigen.

3. Third-passage antigen failed to fix conglutinating as well as haemolytic complement with high serum dilutions. The agglutination reaction and antiglobulin test, however, showed that third-passage antigen absorbed antibody almost as well as ninth-passage and Henzerling strain antigens.

4. It was not possible to find out if the change in behaviour was due to a true antigenic variation or to non-specific hindrance of complement absorption. Heating failed to alter the behaviour of the antigens and the results of absorption tests were inconclusive.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 51 , Issue 3 , September 1953 , pp. 311 - 321
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1953

References

Coombs, R. R. A. & Stoker, M. G. P. (1951). Detection of Q fever antibodies by the anti-globulin sensitization test. Lancet, 2, 15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herzberg, K. & Von, & Urbach, H. (1951). Untersuchungen mit europäischen Q-Fieber-Antigenen. I. Mitteilung. Z. ImmunForsch. 108, 376.Google Scholar
MacCallum, F. O., Marmion, B. P. & Stoker, M. G. P. (1949). Q fever in Great Britain. Isolation of R. burneti from an indigenous case. Lancet, ii, 1026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robbins, F. C., Rustigian, R., Snyder, M. J. & Smadel, J. E. (1946). Q fever in the Mediterranean area: Report of its occurrence in allied troops. III. The etiological agent. Amer. J. Hyg. 44, 51.Google Scholar
Stoker, M. G. P. (1950). Q fever in Great Britain: The causative agent. Lancet, 2, 616.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stoker, M. G. P. & Marmion, B. P. (1952). Detection of Q fever antibodies in whey by the antiglobulin sensitization test and other techniques. J. Hyg., Camb., 50, 1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Topping, N. H., Shepard, C. C. & Huebner, R. J. (1946). Q fever: an immunological comparison of strains. Amer. J. Hyg. 44, 173.Google ScholarPubMed
Wolfe, D. M. & Kornfeld, L. (1949). The application of a quantitative complement-fixation method to a study of Q fever strain differentiation. J. Immunol. 61, 297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed