Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T20:27:35.511Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Trials of the anticoagulant rodenticides bromadiolone and difenacoum against the house mouse (Mus musculus L.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2010

F. P. Rowe ,
C. J. Plant  and
A. Bradfield
F. P. Rowe
Affiliation:
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Tolworth Laboratory, Hook Rise South, Tolworth, Surbiton, Surrey
C. J. Plant
Affiliation:
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Tolworth Laboratory, Hook Rise South, Tolworth, Surbiton, Surrey
A. Bradfield
Affiliation:
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Tolworth Laboratory, Hook Rise South, Tolworth, Surbiton, Surrey
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Laboratory and field trials were conducted to determine the efficacy of the anticoagulant rodenticide bromadiolone against the house mouse (Mus musculus). In laboratory feeding tests, family groups of warfarin-resistant mice maintained in pens and conditioned to feeding on plain foods were offered pinhead oatmeal bait containing bromadiolone at 0·005%. Overall mortality in replicated 21-day poison treatments was 55/58 or 94·8%. Six field trials were carried out, using the same poison bait, against mice infesting farm buildings. Treatment success, estimated from the results of census baitings conducted before and after treatment, ranged between 60·4% and 100%, mean 92·4%. In equivalent field trials using difenacoum, another newly developed anticoagulant rodenticide, the control achieved ranged between 70·2% and 100%, mean 96·0%.

Five field trials, three involving bromadiolone and two difenacoum, were not completely successful and the surviving mice were removed for laboratory examination. In 21-day toxicity tests, each animal was fed the poison bait offered to it earlier in the field. Bromadiolone and difenacoum gave kills of 12/21 (57·1%) and 9/11 (81·8%) respectively. The possible emergence of mouse populations resistant to these anticoagulants is considered.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 87 , Issue 2 , October 1981 , pp. 171 - 177
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

References

Chitty, D. & Kempson, D. A. (1949). Prebaiting small mammals and a new design of live trap. Ecology 30, 536–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadler, M. R., Redfern, R. & Rowe, F. P. (1975). Laboratory evaluation of difenacoum as a rodenticide. Journal of Hygiene 74, 441–448.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huson, L. W. (1980). Statistical analysis of comparative field trials of acute rodenticides. Journal of Hygiene 84, 341–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redfern, R., Gill, J. E. & Hadler, M. R. (1976). The evaluation of WBA 8119 as a rodenticide for use against warfarin-resistant and non-resistant rats and mice. Journal of Hygiene 77, 419–426.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Redfern, R. & Gill, J. E. (1980). Laboratory evaluation of bromadiolone as a rodenticide for use against warfarin-resistant and non-resistant rats and mice. Journal of Hygiene 84, 263–268.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rowe, F. P. & Bradfield, A. (1975). Comparative acute and chronic toxicity tests on confined colonies of wild house mice (Mus musculus L.).Proceedings of the 4th British Pest Control Conference Jersey.April 1975.Google Scholar
Rowe, F. P. & Bradfield, A. (1976). Trials of the anticoagulant rodenticide WBA 8119 against confined colonies of warfarin-resistant house mice (Mus musculus L.). Journal of Hygiene 77, 427–431.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rowe, F. P., Swinney, T. & Plant, C. (1978). Field trials of brodifacoum (WBA) 8119) against the house mouse (Mus musculus L.). Journal of Hygiene 81, 197–201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed