Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T19:30:40.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Transient Fluctuations in the Resistance of Mice to Infection with B. aertrycke

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

G. S. Wilson
G. S. Wilson
Affiliation:
(From the Division of Bacteriology and Immunology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. The virulence of a given strain of B. aertrycke was tested on 54 occasions during the 3-year period, October 1926–October 1929. Each test was made by inoculating intra-peritoneally about 100 viable organisms into 20 parti-coloured mice, usually of 17–23 grm. in weight, drawn at random from the general laboratory stock. The average number of specific deaths caused by this procedure was 12·71 ± 3·39, but very marked deviations were noticeable, varying from a minimum of 5 to a maximum of 20. These deviations occurred without any observable regularity, and appeared to have no definite seasonal relationship. Evidence is brought to suggest that they were chiefly determined not by variations in the dosage or in the virulence of the strain, but by fluctuations in the resistance of the mice.

2. The meaning of the term “resistance” is discussed, and it is suggested that the term “fluctuating immunity” should be used to denote those variations in resistance which occur from time to time, and which are due to alterations in the physiological behaviour of the animal dependent on changing environmental conditions. This fluctuating immunity should be distinguished from innate, inherited, orgenetic immunity on the one hand and from acquired immunity on the other.

3. It is pointed out that the existence of fluctuations from time to time in the susceptibility of animals to infection renders fruitless any attempt to obtain an absolute measure of virulence. The most that can be done is to compare the relative virulence of two or more strains injected simultaneously.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 30 , Issue 2 , June 1930 , pp. 196 - 212
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1930

References

REFERENCES

Blake, Adelaide V. and Okell, C. C. (1929). Brit. J. Exp. Path. 10, 175.Google Scholar
Boycott, A. E. and Price-Jones, C. (1926). J. Path, and Bact. 29, 87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chauveau, A. (1880). C.R. Acad. Sci. 91, 33.Google Scholar
Dalling, T. (1928). Vet. Rec. 8, 841.Google Scholar
Hunt, R. (1910). Hyg. Lab. Bull. No. 69.Google Scholar
Laidlaw, P. P. (1915). Brit. Med. J. 1, 497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lockhart, L. P. (1926). J. Hygiene, 25, 50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasteur, (1878). Bull. Acad. de Médecine, 2me série, 7, 253, 440.Google Scholar
Pearce, LouiseBrown, W. H. and van Allen, C. M. (1924). J. Exp. Med. 40, 603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchett, Ida W. (1925). J. Exp. Med. 41, 209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchett, Ida W.(1926). J. Exp. Med. 43, 173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Südmersen, H. J. and Glenny, A. T. (1909). J. Hygiene, 9, 399.Google Scholar
Topley, W. W. C. (1927). J. State Med. 35, 63.Google Scholar
Topley, W. W. C. and Wilson, G. S. (1929). The principles of bacteriology and immunity. Ed. Arnold and Co., London, Vol. 2, pp. 594–600.Google Scholar
Trevan, J. W. and Boock, Ellen (1926). Rept. League of Nations, C.H. 398, p. 47.Google Scholar
Webster, L. T. (1924). J. Exp. Med. 39, 129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, L. T. and Pritchett, Ida W. (1924). J. Exp. Med. 40, 397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, G. S. (1922). J. Bact. 7, 405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, G. S (1930). J. Hygiene. In press.Google Scholar