Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T09:18:02.533Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The susceptibility of Bandicota bengalensis from Rangoon, Burma to several anticoagulant rodenticides*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

Joe E. Brooks ,
Pe Than Htun  and
Hla Naing
Joe E. Brooks
Affiliation:
Rodent Control Demonstration Unit, World Health Organizatioin, P.O. Box 14, Rangoon, Burma
Pe Than Htun
Affiliation:
Rodent Control Demonstration Unit, World Health Organizatioin, P.O. Box 14, Rangoon, Burma
Hla Naing
Affiliation:
Rodent Control Demonstration Unit, World Health Organizatioin, P.O. Box 14, Rangoon, Burma
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The baseliiie susceptibility of the lesser bandicoot rat, Bandicota bengalensis, from Rangoon, Burma, to five anticoagulant rodenticides was established with no-choice feeding in the laboratory. The susceptibility of lesser bandicoots to the several poisons (brodifacoum, difenacoum, diphacinone, coumatetralyl, and warfarin) was such that they were offered at a 0·001 % concentration. B. bengalensis was most susceptible to brodifacoum, and in descending order, difenacoum, coumatetralyl, diphacinone and warfarin. In comparison with Rattus norvegicus on warfarin at 0·005 %, B. bengalensis proved more susceptible. Feeding tests at 0·005 % concentration indicated that a 1-day feeding on broclifacoum and difenacoum would result in complete mortality, whereas coumatetralyl and warfarin would require 4 days feeding to a 100 % kill. Brodifacoum and difenacoum are recommended at 0·002–0·005 % bait concentrations and coumatetralyl at 0 001 % concentrations for the control of B. bengalensis in the field in Rangoon. The use of any anticoagulant material in rat control should be alternated with acute toxicants to retard the possible development of anticoagulant resistance.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 84 , Issue 1 , February 1980 , pp. 127 - 135
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

References

REFERENCES

Brooks, J. E. & Bowerman, A. M. (1974). An analysis of the susceptibilities of several populations of Rattus norvegicus to warfarin. Journal of Hygiene 73, 401–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brooks, J. E. & Pe Than, Htung (1978). Laboratory evaluation of pyriminyl used as a rodenticide against the lesser bandicoot rat, Bandicota bengalensie. Journal of Hygiene 80, 401–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, J. E., Naing, H., Walton, D. W., Myint, D. S., Tun, M. M., Traung, U. & Kyi, D. O. (1977). Plague in small mammals and humans in Rangoon, Burma. Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health 8, 335–43.Google ScholarPubMed
Deoras, P. J. (1964). Rats and their control. Indian Journal of Entomology. Entomology in India (Supplement), pp. 407–18.Google Scholar
Deoras, P. J. (1965). A note on the trial of two modern ratticides. Current Science 34, 348–9.Google Scholar
Deoras, P. J. (1967). Tolerance status of some rats to an anticoagulant rat poison. Current Science 36, 207–8.Google Scholar
Deoras, P. J., Chaturvedi, G. C., Vad, N. E. & Renapurkar, D. M. (1972). Tolerance shown by Rattus rattus to an anticoagulant rodenticide. Fifth Vertebrate Pest Conference, Fresno, California, pp. 178–88.Google Scholar
Greaves, J. H. & Rehman, A. B. (1977). The susceptibility of Tatera indica, Nesokia inclica and Bandicota bengalensis to three anticoagulant rodenticides. Journal of Hygiene 78, 75–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadler, M. R., Redfern, R. & Rowe, F. P. (1975). Laboratory evaluation of difenacoum as a rodenticide. Journal of Hygiene 74, 441–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hadler, M. R. & Shadbolt, B. S. (1975). Novel 4-hydroxy-coumarin anticoagulants active against resistant rats. Nature London 253, 275–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, W. B., Brooks, J. E., Bowerman, A. M. & Kaukeinen, D. E. (1975). Anticoagulant resistance in Norway rats as found in U.S. cities. Pest Control 43 (4), 12–16.Google Scholar
Kusano, T. (1974). The toxicity of cliphacinone (2-diphenylacetyl-1,3-indandione) to laboratory rats and mice. Japanese Journal of Sanitary Zoology 24, 207–13.Google Scholar
Litchfield, J. T. JR., & Wilcoxon, F. (1949). A simplified method of evaluating dose-effect experiments. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 96, 99–113.Google ScholarPubMed
Peardon, D. L. (1974). RH-727-anewselectiverodenticide. Pest Control 42 (9), 14, 16, 18, 27.Google Scholar
Redfern, R., Gill, J. E. & Hadler, M. R. (1976). Laboratory evaluation of WBA 8119 as a rodenticide for use against warfarin-resistant and non-resistant rats and mice. Journal of Hygiene 77, 419–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Renapurkar, D. M., Menon, T. U. K., Brat, V. M. & Sant, M. V. (1973). Tolerance in Bandicota bengalensis to warfarin. Pesticides, Bombay 7, 23, 27.Google Scholar
Walton, D. W. & Tun, M. M. (1978). Fleas of small mammals from Rangoon, Burma. Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health 9, 369–77.Google ScholarPubMed
Who (1970). Provisional instructions for determining the susceptibility of rodents to anticoagulant rodenticides. World Health Organization Technical Report Series no. 443, 140–47.Google Scholar