Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-495rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-16T10:36:05.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Survival of wound pathogens under different environmental conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

Felicity Pettit
Affiliation:
Hospital Infection Research Laboratory, Summerfield Hospital, Birmingham
E. J. L. Lowbury
Affiliation:
Hospital Infection Research Laboratory, Summerfield Hospital, Birmingham
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Suspensions of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella aerogenes and micrococci were tested for survival on drying and after drying in the atmosphere. The proportion of Gram-negative bacilli that died during drying was greater than that of the Gram-positive cocci, but survival after drying was similar in the two groups of organisms. There were considerable differences in the death-rates on drying of different strains of bacteria, which were consistent on replicate sampling.

A suspension of Ps. aeruginosa prepared from cells which had survived one drying showed a considerably higher proportion of survivors on a second drying; suspensions prepared from subcultures of the dried cells, however, showed a death-rate on drying which was similar to that of the original culture.

Strains of Ps. aeruginosa isolated from floor dust showed a significantly higher proportion of survivors immediately after drying than strains from patients, but the proportion of survivors after 24 hr. of exposure to the atmosphere was approximately the same in the two groups.

Tests were made for survival of Ps. aeruginosa and Staph. aureus in deionized water, tap water, physiological saline and Ringer's solution. In deionized water, Ps. aeruginosa showed a rapid initial loss but some survival for several weeks; Staph. aureus, on the other hand, showed an initial increase in numbers but no survivors after 48 hr. In Ringer's solution all strains of Ps. aeruginosa multiplied rapidly and survived for many weeks; Staph. aureus died rapidly and no strain could be detected after 4 days.

We are grateful to Dr M. T. Parker and Mrs E. Asheshov for the typing of strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1968

References

Ayliffe, G. A. J., Collins, B. J. & Lowbury, E. J. L. (1967). Ward floors and other surfaces as reservoirs of hospital infection. J. Hyg., Camb. 65, 515.Google ScholarPubMed
Bardsley, D. A. (1948). A study of coliform organisms in the Melbourne water supply and in animal faeces, with observations on their longevity in faeces and in soil. J. Hyg., Camb. 46, 269.Google Scholar
Brown, V. I. & Lowbury, E. J. L. (1965). Use of an improved cetrimide agar medium and other culture methods for Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. clin. Path. 18, 752.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crompton, D. O. (1962). Ophthalmic prescribing. Australas. J. Pharm. 30 Oct., p. 1020.Google Scholar
Hellat, A. (1948). Studies on the self-disinfecting power of the skin. Annls Med. exp. Biol. Fenn. 26, supplement 8.Google Scholar
Hurst, V. & Sutter, V. L. (1966). Survival of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the hospital environment. J. infect. Dis. 116, 151.Google Scholar
Lidwell, O. M. & Lowbury, E. J. L. (1950). The survival of bacteria in dust. II. The effect of atmospheric humidity on the survival of bacteria. J. Hyg., Camb. 48, 21.Google Scholar
Lowbury, E. J. L. (1954). Air conditioning with filtered air for dressing burns. Lancet, i, 292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowbury, E. J. L. & Fox, J. (1953). The influence of atmospheric drying on the survival of wound flora. J. Hyg., Camb. 51, 203.Google Scholar
Lowbury, E. J. L. & Fox, J. (1954). The epidemiology of infection with Pseudomonas pyocyanea in a burns unit. J. Hyg., Camb. 52, 403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skaliy, P. & Sciple, G. W. (1964). Survival of staphylococci on hospital surfaces. Archs envir. Hlth 8, 636.Google Scholar