Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T10:21:33.022Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Survival of bacteria in amoebic hepatic pus in vitro

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

K. C. Watson
K. C. Watson
Affiliation:
Department of Pathology, University of Natal, Durban
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Bacterial infection of amoebic hepatic abscess is a relatively uncommon event.

2. Investigations to demonstrate a possible bactericidal effect of liver pus in vitro indicated that small inocula, especially of young cultures, of Sh. sonnei, Staph. pyogenes and an organism of pseudomonas species were rendered sterile. Organisms such as Esch. coli, Saim. typhi, Saim. typhimurium, Sh. boydii and Strep.faecalis showed a drop in viable count during the first few hours of incubation followed by a logarithmic increase. The strain of A. aerogenes, on the other hand, was not decreased in numbers during the first few hours of incubation and showed a prolonged lag phase followed by a logarithmic increase in numbers. Shigella sonnei, Staph. pyogenes, Sh. boydii and Strep. fascalis attained to maximum population densities which were less than those obtained in control broth tubes and less than those of other organisms in liver pus.

3. It is suggested that secondary bacterial infection of amoebic liver abscess is often endogenous in origin, occurring after primary aspiration due to disinte gration of the lining wall of the cavity, allowing the entrance of portal blood containing organisms from the damaged bowel.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 59 , Issue 2 , June 1961 , pp. 161 - 169
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1961

References

REFERENCES

Beeson, P. B., Brannon, E. S. & Warren, J. V. (1945). Observations on sites of removal of bacteria from blood in patients with bacterial endocarditis. J. exp. Med. 81, 9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Broowe, B. N. (1959). Granulomatous diseases of the intestine. Lancet, ii, 745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooke, B. N. & Slaney, G. (1958). Portal bacteraemia in ulcerative colitis. Lancet, i, 1206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeBakey, M. E. & Ochsner, A. (1951). Hepatic amoebiasis; a 20 year experience and analysis of 263 cases. Int. Abstr. Surg. 92, 209.Google ScholarPubMed
Lamont, N. McE. & Pooler, N. R. (1958). Hepatic amoebiasis: a study of 250 cases. Quart. J. Med. 27, 389.Google ScholarPubMed
McDermott, W. (1958). Microbial persistence. Yale J. Bed. Med. 30, 257.Google ScholarPubMed
Maddison, S. E., Powell, S. J. & Elsdon-Dew, R. (1959). Bacterial infection of amoebic liver abscess. Med. Proc. 5, 514.Google Scholar
Miles, A. A. & Misra, S. S. (1938). The estimation of the bactericidal power of blood. J. Hyg., Camb. 38, 732.Google Scholar
Roach, G. G. (1958). The pathology of amoebiasis. Proc. 6th Int. Congr. Trop. Med. & Malar. Lisbon.Google Scholar
Schatten, W. E., Desprez, J. D. & Holden, W. D. (1955). A bacteriologic study of portal vein blood in man. Arch. Surg. 71, 404.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scraug, J. (1960). Amoebic liver abscess in African children. Arch. Dis. Child. 35, 171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sepulveda, B., Jinick, H., Bassols, F. & Munoz, R. (1959). Amoebiasis of the liver; diagnosis, prognosis and treatment. Amer. J. Digest. Dis. 4, 43.Google ScholarPubMed