Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T08:26:14.034Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Submarine escape breathing air

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

Kenneth W. Donald
Affiliation:
Late Senior Medical Officer, Admiralty Experimental Diving Unit, Chief Assistant, Medical Professorial Unit, St Bartholomew's Hospital
W. M. Davidson
Affiliation:
Specialist in Naval Hygiene, R.N. Medical School
W. O. Shelford
Affiliation:
Royal Navy Superintendent of Diving, Royal Navy
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Recent research has even further emphasized the physiological dangers to which man is exposed when breathing gases at increased tensions. If he breathes air his activity under water is greatly limited by the problems of supply and compressed air illness. The latter is due to the formation of bubbles of nitrogen in the body on return to normal atmosphere. If he breathes oxygen, then he is in grave danger of oxygen poisoning, with convulsions, even at relatively shallow depths (Donald, 1947). During the recent war, mixtures of nitrogen and oxygen were employed for important work where the diver wished to go to considerable depths while carrying his own gases. These mixtures were varied in composition and rate of supply so that oxygen poisoning was avoided, and immediate rapid surfacing was possible, without compressed air illness occurring. However, this ingenious compromise is limited in its application, for as greater depths are reached, the oxygen has to be greatly reduced to avoid convulsions. The resultant rise in the proportion of nitrogen being breathed causes bubble formation in any but the shortest exposures. It is to be doubted whether the maintenance and meticulous supervision required, when using mixtures, will allow the use of these in the more normal conditions of peace-time. It has become increasingly apparent that the prolonged underwater survival of men requires pressure-withstanding devices in which he can exist at normal physiological tensions, i.e. atmospheric pressure. The rigid diving suit and submersible chambers, such as the bathysphere, are in their infancy; but the submarine, where the same conditions apply, is now a highly successful and developed method of underwater existence and locomotion. The further evolution of these devices, and of the submarine, depends mainly on engineering advances and not upon attempting to extend the comparatively rigid limits imposed by human physiology. The maintenance of a healthy atmosphere within a submarine is again a chemical and engineering problem which is capable of solution and constant improvement.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1948

References

REFERENCES

Admiralty Committee on Deep Water Diving (1907). Parl. Paper C.N. 1549.Google Scholar
Admiralty Deep Diving and Ordinary Diving Committee (1933). R.N. Diving Rep.Google Scholar
Behnke, A. R., Thomson, R. M. & Shaw, L. A. (1935). Amer. J. Physiol. 114, 137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bert, Paul (1878). La Pression Barométrique. Paris: Masson.Google Scholar
Bornstein, A. (1910). Berl. klin. Wschr. 47, 1272.Google Scholar
Case, E. M. & Haldane, J. B. S. (1941). J. Hyg., Camb., 41, 225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donald, K. W. (1947). Brit. Med. J. 1, 667, 712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donald, K. W. & Davidson, W. M. (1945). Adm. Exp. Div. Unit Rep. 17 (Surface decompression.)Google Scholar
Haldane, J. B. S. (1939). Lancet, 2, 419.Google Scholar
Schrotter, H. von (1906). Der Sauerstoff in der Prophylaxie und Therapie der Luftdruckerkrungen.Google Scholar
Shilling, C. W. & Willgrube, W. W. (1937). Nav. Med. Bull., Wash., 35, 373.Google Scholar