Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T15:48:44.288Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Study of the Coltform Organisms Infecting the Wounds of War

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

Matthew J. Stewart
Matthew J. Stewart
Affiliation:
Pathologist, East Leeds War Hospital.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Already during the present war an extensive literature has grown up on the subject of the bacteriology of septic wounds. It was thought that a detailed study of the coliform organisms met with in these wounds might yield results of interest, and be a useful addition to some of the more general bacteriological contributions.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 16 , Issue 3 , December 1917 , pp. 291 - 316
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1917

References

Castellani, A. (1912). Observations on some Intestinal Bacteria found in Man. Centralbl. f. Bakteriol. Orig., XIV. 262.Google Scholar
Dean, H. R. and Mouat, T. B. (1916). The Bacteriology of Gangrenous Wounds. Journ. Roy. Army Med. Corps, XXVI. 189.Google Scholar
Distaso, A. (1916). Flora of wounds and flora of putrefaction. Lancet, I. 74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, S. R. (1914). On a Method of making Cultivation Media without prepared Peptones. Lancet, II. 891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dungeon, L. S., Gardner, A. D. and Bawtree, F. (1915). Bacterial Flora of Wounds produced during the Present War. Lancet, I 1222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleming, A. (1915). On the Bacteriology of Septic Wounds. Lancet, II. 638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goadby, K. (1916). The natural history of Septic Wounds. Lancet, II. 89, 585, 851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grünbaum, A. S. and Hume, E. H. (1902). Note on Media for distinguishing B. coli. B. typhosus and Related Species. Brit. Med. Journ. I. 1473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holman, W. L. (1915). The Use of Decolorised Acid Fuchsin as an acid indicator in carbohydrate fermentation tests, with some remarks on acid production by Bacteria. Journ. Infect. Dis. XV. 227.Google Scholar
Jordan, E. O. (1903). The kinds of Bacteria found in River Water. Journ. of Hyg. III. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kligler, I. J. (1914). Observations on Indol production by bacteria of the Colon-Typhoid group. Journ. Infect. Dis. XIV. 81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kligler, I. J. (1914). Studies in the classification of the Colon group. Journ. Infect. Dis. XV. 187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, M. (1916). The correlation of the Voges-Proskauer and Methyl red reactions in the Colon Aerogenes group of Bacteria. Journ. Infect. Dis. XVIII. 358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, C. J. (1916). The coliform organism of Water Cress. Birm. Med. Rev. XXXI. 1.Google Scholar
MacConkey, A. (1905). Lactose fermenting Bacteria in faeces. Journ. of Hyg. V. 333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacConkey, A. (1909). Further Observations on the differentiation of Lactose-Fermenting Bacilli, with special reference to those of Intestinal Origin. Journ. of Hyg. IX. 86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, H. De R. (1906). Upon the Bacteriology of the Summer Diarrhoea. Brit. Med. Journ. I. 908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seidelin, H. and Lewis, F. C. (1911). Some Notes on Indole Reaction and Allied Phenomena. Journ. of Hyg. XI. 503.Google Scholar
Tobey, E. U. (1908). A new Paradimethylamidobenzaldehyde Test for Indol. Journ. Med. Research, XIX 499.Google Scholar
Wilson, W. J. (1908). Bacteriological Observations on colon bacilli infecting the urinary tract, with special remarks on certain colon bacilli of the “Anaerogenes” class. Journ. of Hyg. VIII. 543.Google Scholar