Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T16:31:25.616Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A study of English diets by the individual method: III. Pregnant women at different economic levels

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

R. A. McCance ,
E. M. Widdowson  and
C. M. Verdon-Roe
R. A. McCance
Affiliation:
From the Biochemical Department, King's College Hospital, S.E. 5
E. M. Widdowson
Affiliation:
From the Biochemical Department, King's College Hospital, S.E. 5
C. M. Verdon-Roe
Affiliation:
From the Biochemical Department, King's College Hospital, S.E. 5
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. The diets of 120 pregnant women at different economic levels have been studied by the individual method.

2. The intake of calories was found to be little affected by income, and this was true also of fat and carbohydrate. The intakes of protein, animal protein, calcium, phosphorus, iron and vitamin B1 rose convincingly with income.

3. These differences were due to the fact that a rise in spending power led to an increased consumption of milk, fruit, vegetables and meat, and to a decreased consumption of bread and total cereals. Details are given in Table V.

4. Women taking the better diets were found on average to be taller and less anaemic than those taking the poorer diets. The differences were significant.

5. A comparison of the diets of the well-to-do women with the requirements suggested by the League of Nations and other authorities suggests that the requirement for calories has been set too high. The intake of calcium was suboptimal throughout and the diets of the poorer women were deficient in many respects.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 38 , Issue 5 , September 1938 , pp. 596 - 622
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1938

References

REFERENCES

Abrahams, M. & Widdowson, E. M. (1937). Modern Dietary Treatment. Baillière, Tindall and Cox.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, A. Z. & Weight, M. D. (1935). Biochem. J. 29, 1802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, A. Z., Wright, M. D. & Drummond, J. C. (1937). J. Soc. chem. Ind., Lond., 56, 191, T.Google Scholar
Burr, G. O. & Burr, M. M. (1930). J. biol. Chem. 86, 587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cathcart, E. P. & Murray, A. M. T. (1931). Spec. Rep. Ser. med. Res. Counc., Lond., No. 151.Google Scholar
Coons, C. M. (1932). J. biol. Chem. 97, 215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coons, C. M. (1935). Bull. Okla. Agric. Mech. Coll. Exp. Sta. No. 223.Google Scholar
Coons, C. M. & Blunt, K. (1930). J. biol. Chem. 86, 1.Google Scholar
Coons, C. M. & Marshall, G. B. (1934). J. Nutrit. 7, 67.Google Scholar
Cowgill, G. R. (1934). The Vitamin B Requirement of Man. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cox, W. M. & Imboden, M. (1934 a). J. biol. Chem. 105, XVIII.Google Scholar
Cox, W. M. & Imboden, M. (1934 b). Proc. Soc. exp. Biol., N.Y., 32, 313.Google Scholar
Cox, W. M. & Imboden, M. (1936). J. Nutrit. 11, 147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummings, H. H. (1934). Amer. J. Obstet. Gynec. 27, 808.Google Scholar
Daniel, E. P. & Munsell, H. E. (1937). Misc. Pub. U.S. Dept. Agric. No. 275.Google Scholar
Evans, M. D. A. (1937). Brit. med. J., 1, 157.Google Scholar
Evans, H. M., Lepkovsky, S. & Murphy, E. A. (1934). J. biol. Chem. 106, 431, 441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fixsen, M. A. B. & Roscoe, M. H. (1938). Nutr. Abstr. Rev. 7, 823.Google Scholar
Garry, R. C. & Stiven, D. (1936). Nutr. Abst. Rev. 5, 855.Google Scholar
Givens, M. H. & Macy, I. G. (1933). J. biol. Chem. 102, 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, V. J. (1925). Physiol. Rev. 5, 279.Google Scholar
Hilgenberg, F. C. (1930). Z. Geburtsh. Gynäk. 98, 291.Google Scholar
Hoffström, K. A. (1910). Skand. Arch. Physiol. 23, 326.Google Scholar
Hummell, F. C., Hunscher, H. A., Bates, M. F., Bonner, P. & Macy, I. G. (1937). J. Nutrit. 13, 263.Google Scholar
Hummell, F. C., Sternberger, H. R., Hunscher, H. A. & Macy, I. G. (1936). J. Nutrit. 11, 235.Google Scholar
Hunscher, H. A., Donelson, E., Nims, B., Kenyon, F. & Macy, I. G. (1933). J. biol. Chem. 99, 507.Google Scholar
Hunscher, H. A., Hummell, F. C., Erickson, B. N. & Macy, I. G. (1935). J. Nutrit. 10, 579.Google Scholar
kyer, J. L. & Bethell, F. H. (1936). J. biol. Chem. 114, lX.Google Scholar
Landsberg, E. (1912). Z. Geburtsh. Gynäk. 71, 163.Google Scholar
League of Nations Technical Commission (1936). Report on the Physiological Bases of Nutrition.Google Scholar
McCance, R. A. & Shipp, H. L. (1933). Spec. Rep. Ser. med. Res. Counc., Lond., No. 187.Google Scholar
McCance, R. A., Widdowson, E. M. & Shackleton, L. R. B. (1936). Spec. Rep. Ser. med. Res. Counc., Lond., No. 213.Google Scholar
McIlroys, L. (1935). Proc. roy. Soc. Med. 28, 85.Google Scholar
Macy, I. G. & Hunscher, H. A. (1934). Amer. J. Obstet. Gynec. 27, 878.Google Scholar
Macy, I. G., Hunscher, H. A., Nims, B. & McCosh, S. S. (1930). J. biol. Chem. 86, 17.Google Scholar
Macy, I. G., Donelson, E., Long, M. L. & Graham, A. (1931). J. Amer. Diet. Ass. 6, 314.Google Scholar
Mellanby, E. (1933). Lancet, No. 225, 1131.Google Scholar
Orr, J. B. (1936). Food, Health and Income. Macmillan.Google Scholar
Orr, J. B. & Leitch, I. (1938). Nutr. Abst. Rev. 7, 509.Google Scholar
Rabinowitch, I. M. & Smith, F. C. (1936). J. Nutrit. 12, 337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowe, A. W. & Boyd, W. C. (1932). J. Nutrit. 5, 551.Google Scholar
Rowe, A. W., Gallivan, D. E. & Matthews, H. (1931 a). Amer. J. Physiol. 96, 101.Google Scholar
Rowe, A. W., Gallivan, D. E. & Matthews, H. (1931 b). Proc. Soc. exp. Biol., N.Y., 28, 664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandiford, I. & Wheeler, T. (1924–1925). J. biol. Chem. 62, 329.Google Scholar
Sandiford, I., Wheeler, T. & Boothby, W. M. (1931). Amer. J. Physiol. 96, 191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siddall, R. S. & Mack, H. C. (1933). Amer. J. Obstet. Gynec. 26, 244.Google Scholar
Spiga-Clerici, A. (1937). Quad. Nutriz. 4, 142. (From Nutr. Abstr. Rev. 1937, 7, 374.)Google Scholar
Strauss, M. B. (1935). Amer. J. med. Sci. 190, 811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toverud, K. U. (1935). Acta Paediat. 17, Suppl.131.Google Scholar
Toverud, K. U. & Toverud, G. (1931). Acta Paediat. 12, Suppl.II.Google Scholar
Wait, B. & Roberts, L. J. (1932). J. Amer. Diet. Ass. 8, 323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, C., Berkeley, C. & Fairbairn, J. S. (1935). Midwifery. Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Widdowson, E. M. (1936). J. Hyg., Camb., 36, 269.Google Scholar
Widdowson, E. M. & McCance, R. A. (1936). J. Hyg., Camb., 36, 293.Google Scholar
Widdowson, E. M. & McCance, R. A. (1937). Biochem. J. 31, 2029.Google Scholar
Wilson, K. M. (1916). Johns Hopk. Hosp. Bull. 27, 121.Google Scholar