Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T05:14:43.975Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies on transmission of Staphylococcus aureus in an isolation ward for burned patients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

Anna Hambraeus
Anna Hambraeus
Affiliation:
Institute of Medical Microbiology, Department of Clinical Bacteriology, University of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A one-year epidemiological investigation was made in an isolation ward for burned patients. The transmission of Staphylococcus aureus was mainly studied. In spite of the design of the ward the cross-infection rate was high. In all, 49 of 69 patients were infected 114 times. Twenty-six of the strains causing infection were found in a patient only, 10 in a member of the staff only and 23 in both patients and staff the week before they caused a new infection. There were three epidemic outbreaks caused by three strains of Staph. aureus all belonging to phage group III; one was resistant to methicillin. Environmental studies with settle plates showed that the number of staphylococci dispersed by a burned patient was often very high. In 8% of the observations in occupied bedrooms the air count of Staph. aureus was more than 1800 col./m.2 hr. However, the counts of Staph. aureus in the corridor and service areas were low. This seems to indicate a rather good protection against airborne transfer of bacteria. Other routes of infection were probably of greater importance.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 71 , Issue 1 , March 1973 , pp. 171 - 183
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1973

References

Blair, J. E. & Williams, R. E. O. (1961). Phage-typing of staphylococci. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 24, 771.Google ScholarPubMed
Cason, J. S., Jackson, D. M., Lowbury, E. J. L. & Ricketts, C. R. (1966). Antiseptic and aseptic prophylaxis for burns: use of silver nitrate and of isolators. British Medical Journal ii, 1288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ericsson, H., Högman, C. & Wickman, Kiristina, (1954). A paper disc method for determination of bacterial sensitivity to chemotherapeutic and antibiotic agents. Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation, 6, suppl. xi.Google Scholar
Hambraeus, Anna & Sanderson, H. F. (1972). Studies with an airborne particle tracer in an isolation ward for burned patients. Journal of Hygiene 70, 299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Körlof, B. (1956). Infection of burns. Acta Chirurgica Scandinavica, suppi. 209.Google Scholar
Lowbury, E. J. L., Babb, J. R. & Ford, Pamela M. (1971). Protective isolation in a burns unit; the use of plastic isolators and air curtains. Journal of Hygiene 69, 529.Google Scholar
Matter, P., Barclay, T. L. & Koničková, Z. eds. (1971). Transactions of the Third International Congress on Research in Burns, p. 107. Hans Huber Publishers, Bern.Google Scholar
Tromsen, M. (1970). The burns unit in Coperthagen, VI. Infection rates. Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 4, 53.Google Scholar
Weyer, E. M., Krauss, M. & Sussell, K., eds. (1968). Early treatment of severe burns. Part V: Systemic and local infection and Immunity. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 150, 922.Google Scholar
Wickman, Kristina (1970). Studies on Burns, XIV; Bacteriology II. Acta Chirurgica Scandinavica suppl. 408.Google Scholar
Williams, R. E. O. & Harding, Lynn (1969). Studies of the effectiveness of an isolation ward. Journal of Hygiene 67, 649.Google ScholarPubMed