Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T15:11:17.473Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies on the pathogenesis of rinderpest in experimental cattle: IV. Proliferation of the virus following contact infection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

W. P. Taylor ,
W. Plowright ,
R. Pillinger ,
C. S. Rampton  and
R. F. Staple
W. P. Taylor
Affiliation:
East African Veterinary Research Organization, Muguga, P.O. Box 32, Kikuyu, Kenya
W. Plowright
Affiliation:
East African Veterinary Research Organization, Muguga, P.O. Box 32, Kikuyu, Kenya
R. Pillinger
Affiliation:
East African Veterinary Research Organization, Muguga, P.O. Box 32, Kikuyu, Kenya
C. S. Rampton
Affiliation:
East African Veterinary Research Organization, Muguga, P.O. Box 32, Kikuyu, Kenya
R. F. Staple
Affiliation:
East African Veterinary Research Organization, Muguga, P.O. Box 32, Kikuyu, Kenya
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Cattle were infected with rinderpest virus by housing them for 24 hr. in stalls containing donor animals which had been reacting to the disease for 3–5 days. They were then transferred to individual clean stalls and killed on the 2nd to 10th days following first exposure. Various tissues were collected, particularly those of the upper and lower respiratory tracts, and their virus content was estimated in calf-kidney tissue cultures.

Virus was recovered from 15 of 35 animals tested and in eight of these generalization had occurred, although only two had begun to show a pyrexial response. The stage of the infection could not be predicted from the time that had elapsed following exposure, since early, limited proliferation was encountered on the 3rd to the 10th days.

It was considered that seven animals gave indications of the pathways by which natural infection had occurred. In each of these virus proliferation was established very early in the pharyngeal lymph node; in three the submaxillary lymph node was similarly involved and in four the palatal tonsil. It was suggested that these data probably indicated that infection always occurred via the upper respiratory tract.

In three cases virus titres were highest in the bronchial or costocervical lymph nodes; this was construed as evidence for the additional involvement of the lower respiratory tract in primary infection.

No infectivity could be demonstrated in the mucosae or lung parenchyma associated with the above-mentioned lymph nodes and this, together with previously published data, was accepted as strong presumptive evidence that the infecting virus passes through the mucosae without producing a local lesion or proliferating there. These results were compared briefly with those of Bedson & Duckworth (1963) for rabbit pox.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 63 , Issue 4 , December 1965 , pp. 497 - 506
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1965

References

Bedson, H. S. & Duckworth, M. J. (1963). Rabbit pox: an experimental study of the pathways of infection in rabbits. J. Path. Bact. 85, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blood, D. C. & Henderson, J. A. (1960). Veterinary Medicine. London: Bailliere, Tindall and Cox.Google Scholar
Cooper, H. (1932). Rinderpest: transmission of infection by contact. Indian J. vet. Sci. 2, 284–90.Google Scholar
Davies, G. O. (1955). Gaiger and Davies's Veterinary Pathology and Bacteriology. London: Baillière, Tindall and Cox.Google Scholar
Hagan, W. A. & Bruner, D. W. (1961). The Infectious Diseases of Domestic Animals. London: Baillière, Tindal & Cox.Google Scholar
Hall, G. N. (1933). Studies on rinderpest immunization. Thesis, Zürich.Google Scholar
Henning, M. W. (1949). Animal Diseases in South Africa, 2nd ed.South Africa: Central News Agency Ltd.Google Scholar
Hornby, H. E. (1926). Studies on rinderpest immunity. II. Methods of infection. Vet. J. 82, 348–55.Google Scholar
Hutrya, F., Marek, J. & Manninger, R. (1946). Special Pathology and Therapeutics of the Diseases of Domestic Animals, fifth English ed., Vol. 1, pp. 256–84. London: Baillière, Tindall & Cox.Google Scholar
Liess, B. & Plowright, W. (1964). Studies on the pathogenesis of rinderpest in experimental cattle. I. Correlation of clinical signs, viraemia and virus excretion by various routes. J. Hyg., Camb., 62, 81–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maurer, F. D. (1965). In Viral and Bickettsial Diseases of Animals, ed. Betts, A. O. and York, C. J..New York: Academic Press Inc. (to be published).Google Scholar
Payling Wright, G. (1954). An Introduction to Pathology, p. 49, 2nd ed.London: Longmans Green and Co.Google Scholar
Plowright, W. (1964). Studies on the pathogenesis of rinderpest in experimental cattle. II. Proliferation of the virus in different tissues following intranasal infection. J. Hyg., Camb., 62, 257–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Plowright, W. & Ferris, R. D. (1961). Studies with rinderpest virus in tissue culture. III. The stability of cultured virus and its use in virus neutralization tests. Arch. ges. Virus-forsch. 11, 516–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Provost, A. (1958). Essaies de transmission de la peste bovine par aerosols virulents. Bull. epizoot. Dis. Afr. 6, 79–85.Google Scholar
Schein, H. & Jacotot, H. (1925). La séro-infection: vaccination préventive contre la peste bovine. Archs Insts Pasteur Indo-Chine, no. 1, pp. 48–56.Google Scholar
Sisson, S. & Grossman, J. D. (1953). The Anatomy of the Domestic Animals. Philadelphia and London: W. B. Saunders Co.Google Scholar
Taylor, W. P. & Plowright, W. (1965). Studies on the pathogenesis of rinderpest in experimental cattle. III. Proliferation of an attenuated strain in various tissues following subcutaneous inoculation. J. Hyg., Camb., 63, 263–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar