Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T15:19:15.389Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies in Anti-rabies Immunisation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

G. Stuart  and
K. S. Krikorian
G. Stuart
Affiliation:
(Central Laboratories, Department of Health, Government of Palestine.)
K. S. Krikorian
Affiliation:
(Central Laboratories, Department of Health, Government of Palestine.)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Statistical evidence and animal experiment have alike proved carbolised killed anti-rabies vaccine to be of undoubted efficacy in both pre-infectional and post-infectional treatment. Statistical evidence is furnished by the results of treatment of 90,000 patients, while experimental proof rests partly on the resistance shown by immunised animals to artificial infections with street virus, and partly on an estimation of degree and duration of rabicidal properties in their sera.

2. The Bordet-Gengou reaction is of no value as a qualitative or quantitative test for the estimation of anti-rabies immunity.

3. The efficacy of killed carbolised vaccine and probably of other antirabies vaccines is largely dependent on the concentration of the dosage and the period within which it is administered. Better results follow the giving of small doses over a number of days than the giving of larger doses over a shorter period.

4. It is impossible to reduce below a certain limit the time over which the total quantity of vaccine ordinarily sufficient for complete immunisation can be usefully administered.

5. The effect on rabbits of the subcutaneous injection of fresh-fixed virus is dependent on the quantity of virus introduced and on the duration of its period of administration. Few inoculations are more likely to cause death than several; repeated inoculations ordinarily confer immunity. Immunity thus acquired must have been produced within 11 or 12 days.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 29 , Issue 1 , April 1929 , pp. 1 - 34
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1929

References

REFERENCES

Babes, (1891). Bakteriologisches vom VII internationalen Kongress für Hygiene und Demographie zu London. Centralbl. f. Bakt. 10, 767.Google Scholar
Babes, (1892). [Communication made to the Académie de medecine] cited in Traité de la rage, 1912, 540–541.Google Scholar
Babes, (1898). Sur le traitement de la rage par I'injection de substance nerveuse normale. C. R. Acad. des Sci. 116, 986.Google Scholar
Babes, and Lepp, (1889). Recherches sur la vaccination antirabique. Ann. Inst. Pasteur, 3, 384.Google Scholar
Babes, and Simici, (1910). Sur l'action de la substance nerveuse normale dans la rage. C. R. Soc. Biol. 68, 71.Google Scholar
Bareggi, (1889). Sui cinque casi di rabbia paralitica da laboratorio nell' uomo. Gazz. med. Lombard. 48, 217.Google Scholar
Baroni, Ciuca and Jonescu, (1908). Recherches sur la présence d'anticorps specifiques dans le sérum et les extraits d'organes d'animaux vaccine's contre la rage. C. R. Soc. Biol. 65, 96.Google Scholar
Berry, and Mann, (1910). The complement binding test in rabies. J. Exper. Med. 12, 338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burmeister, (1915). The absence of demonstrable specific antibodies in rabies caused by fixed virus. J. Infect. Dis. 17, 423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Centanni, (1908). Sulla diagnosi della rabbia per mezzo della sotrazione del complemento. 1Centralbl. f. Bakt. 41, 706.Google Scholar
Contani, (1908). Sulla diagnosi della rabbia per mezzo della sotrazione della del complemento. Atti della Regia Accademia dei Fisiocratici in Siena. Serie IV, 18. Cited in Centralbl. f. Bakt. 41, 706.Google Scholar
Donati, and Satta, (1908). Sulla deviazione del complemento nella rabbia. Pathologica, 1. 1.Google Scholar
Fermi, (1908). Ueber die immunisierende Kraft der normalen Nervensubstanz vergleichen mit der Wutnervensubstanz der Wut gegenüber. Centralbl. f. Bakt. 48, 168.Google Scholar
Fermi, (1909). Nuovi contributi allo Studio della Rabia. Ann. Inst. D'Igiene Sper. 19, 325.Google Scholar
Ferran, (1888). Sur la vaccination antirabique de l'homme. Ann. Inst. Pasteur, 2, 97.Google Scholar
Franca, (1910). Du danger de l'emploi des moëlles plus virulentes dans le traitement de la rage. Centralbl. f. Bald. 55, 154.Google Scholar
Friedberger, (1907). Hat die Methode der Komplementablenkung cine Bedeutung für die Diagnose der Lyssa? Wien. klin. Wochenschr. 20, 879.Google Scholar
Friedberger, and Eisler, v. (1907). Ueber das Bindungsvermögen des Lyssavirus für rabicides Serum und die Natur der rabiciden Substanz. Centralbl. f. Bakt. 44, 695.Google Scholar
Glusmann, and Solowjowa, (1927). Ueber den diagnostischen Wert der Komplement-bindungsreaktion bei Lyssa. Zeitschr. f. Immunitäts. 54, 199.Google Scholar
Harvey, and Acton, (1923). The degree of efficacy of antirabic treatment. J. Ind. Med. Res. 10, 1039.Google Scholar
Harvey, and McKendrick, (1907). Theory and Practice of Antirabic Immunization. Sci. Memoirs, Gov. of India, No. 30.Google Scholar
Heller, and Tomarkin, (1907). 1st die Methode der Komplementbindung beim Nachweis spezifischer Stoffe für Hundewut und Vaccine brauchbar? Deutsche med. Wochenschr. 33, 795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horowttz, (1926). Ueber die Komplementablenkungsreaktion bei der Tollwut. Centralbl. f. Bakt. 98, 216.Google Scholar
Isabolinsky, and Zbitlina, (1927). Zur Frage über die biologischen Eigenschaften des Virus fixe. Zeitschr. f. Immunitatsforschung. 49, 67.Google Scholar
Kitt, (1925). [Diskussion zu Schnürer.] Centralbl. f. Bakt. 78, 160.Google Scholar
Koch, (1927). Ueber paralytische atypische abortive und die sogenannte Impfwut. Centralbl. f. Bakt. 104, 381–409.Google Scholar
Kondo, (1922). On the antirabic vaccination of the dog; on the rabicidal property of anti-rabies serum. J. of Japan. Soc. Veter. Sci. 1, 279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kostrbzewski, (1920). Untersuchungen über die Blutserumeigenschaften bei den tollwut-schutzgeimpften Menschen. Centralbl. f. Bakt. 84, 106.Google Scholar
Kozewalora, (1910). Ueber komplementbindende und rabizide Substanzen im Blute wutkranker Kaninchen. Centralbl. f. Bakt. 54, 564.Google Scholar
Kraus, , Gerlach, and Schweinburg, (1926). Lyssa bei Mensch und Tier. (Berlin and Vienna: Urban and Schwarzenberg.)Google Scholar
Kraus, , Kellner, and Clairmont, (1902). Ueber das Verhalten des Lyssa virus im Zentral-nervensystem empfänglicher, natürlich immuner und immunisierter Tiere. Zeitschr. f. Hyg. u. Infektionskr. 41, 486.Google Scholar
Kraus, and Kreissl, (1902). Ueber den Nachweis von Schutzstoffen gegen Hundswut beim Menschen. Centralbl. f. Bakt. 32, 810.Google Scholar
Kraus, and Maresch, (1902). Ueber die Bildung von Immunsubstanz gegen das Lyssa virus bei natürlich empfänglichen Tieren. Zeitschr. f. Hyg. und Infektionskr. 41, 527.Google Scholar
Kraus, and Michalka, (1926). Die Diagnose des Lyssavirus mittels Komplementablenkung mit Koktoimmunogen und Glycerinextrakt. Zeitschr. Für Immunitätsf. 47, 504.Google Scholar
Kraus, and Takaki, (1926). Der Nachweis der neurotropen Virusarten mittels Komplementablenkung mit Koktoantigen. Wien. klin. Wochenschr. 39, 624.Google Scholar
Lasser, (1927). Zur Diagnose der Lyssa durch Präzipitation. Zeitschr. f. Immunitätsf. 53, 1.Google Scholar
Lubinski, and Prausnitz, (1926). Lyssa. Ergebnisse der Hygiene, Bakteriologie, Immunitats-fOrschung und Experimentellen Therapie, 8, 1.Google Scholar
Marie, (1904). De quelques propriétés du sérum antirabique. C. R. Soc. Biol. 56, 1030.Google Scholar
Marie, (1905). Recherches sur le sérum antirabique. Ann. Inst. Pasteur, 19, 1.Google Scholar
Marie, (1908). Recherches sur le sérum antirabique. Ann. Inst. Pasteur, 22, 271.Google Scholar
Marie, (1912). Propriétés biologiques de substances albuminoides extraites du cerveau. Ann. Inst. Pasteur, 26, 441.Google Scholar
McKendrick, (1927). Rabies: A Review of recent articles, 8. Trop. Dis. Bull. 03 1928, p. 188.Google Scholar
Miessner, (1912). Ueber Tollwutschutzimpfung bei Tieren. Centralbl. f. Bakt. 54, 73.Google Scholar
Moses, (1910). Ueber den Nachweis von Antigen und Antikörper durch Komplementablenkung. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz, 1, 109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nedrigailoff, and Sawtschenko, (1911). Ueber die Anwendung der Komplementbindungs-methode für die Diagnose der Tollwut. Zeitschr. f. Immunitätsf. 8, 353.Google Scholar
Nikolajewa, (1925). Antiwutimpfung mittels Carbolvaccine nach der Methode von Prof. Fermi. Centralbl. f. Bakt. 95, 423.Google Scholar
Pasteur, (1886). Cited in Babes (1912). Traité de la rage, 613.Google Scholar
Pereira da, Silva (1926). Persistance des substances rabicides dans le sang des individus traités par le virus rabique fixe étherisé. G. R. Soc. Biol. 95, 323.Google Scholar
Prausnitz, (1927). Ergebnisse der Internationalen Tollwutkonferenz in Paris. Centralbl. f. Bakt. 87, 529–548.Google Scholar
Puntoni, (1924). Effetti della glicerina e del freddo sulla soprovivenza sul perioda di incu-bazione del virus rabico. Ann. D'Igiene. 34, 716.Google Scholar
Remlinger, (1905). Contribution à I'eacute des melanges de serum antirabique et de virus fixé. Ann. D'Igiene. 57, 637.Google Scholar
Schnüber, (1905). Zur praeinfektionellen Immunisierung der Hunde gegen Lyssa. Zeitschr. f. Hyg. u. Infektionskr. 51, 46.Google Scholar
Schdxtz, , Bullock, and Breweb, (1928). The antigenic properties of rabies virus. J. of Immunology, 15, 265–281.Google Scholar
Semple, (1908).On the preparation and use of antirabic serum and on the rabicidal properties of the serum of patients after undergoing antirabic treatment. Lancet, i, 1611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Semple, (1911). On the preparation of a safe and efficient antirabic vaccine. Scientific Memoirs by Off. of Med. and San. Dep. of Gov. of India.Google Scholar
Stuart, and Krikorian, (1925). Antirabic procedure in Palestine with special reference to decentralisation of treatment. Ann. of Trap. Med. and Parasit. 19, 393–418.Google Scholar
Tomarktn, and Srrarez, (1917). Prazipitation und Thermopräzipitation bei Vaccine. Zeitschr. f. Immunitätsf. 26, 385.Google Scholar
Umeno, and Doi, (1921). A study on the antirabic inoculation of dogs, and the results of its practical application. Kitasato Arch, of Exper. Med. 4, 89.Google Scholar
VallÉe, (1927). Anti-Rabies vaccination of animals. Report to International Rabies Conference, 137.Google Scholar
Viala, (1891). Sur les causes de I'atténuation des moelles rabiques. Ann. Inst. Pasteur, 5, 695.Google Scholar
Zell, (1913). Serodiagnosis of rabies. Amer. J. Veter. Med. 8, 637.Google Scholar