Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T15:16:29.418Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Spread of Bacterial Infection; Group-to-Group Infection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

W. W. C. Topley  and
G. S. Wilson
W. W. C. Topley
Affiliation:
From the Department of Bacteriology and Preventive Medicine, University of Manchester.
G. S. Wilson
Affiliation:
From the Department of Bacteriology and Preventive Medicine, University of Manchester.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Susceptible mice have been placed in contact with infective individuals of the same species, separated from them after a definite period, and placed in contact with a further group of normal mice. This process has then been repeated again and again, the number of groups exposed varying, in different experiments, from three to twelve. In this way the spread of infection has been limited to that occurring between any one group and the group immediately following it.

Under these circumstances infection has spread far less readily than was the cases in other experiments, in which the mice were retained as a single population, and in which infection could spread in any direction among all the individuals at risk.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 21 , Issue 3 , May 1923 , pp. 237 - 242
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1923

References

REFERENCES

Amoss, H. L. (1922 a). Experimental Epidemiology. An artificially induced epidemic of mouse typhoid. Journ. Exp. Med. XXXVI. 25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amoss, H. L. (1922 b). Experimental Epidemiology. Effect of the addition of healthy mice to a population suffering from mouse typhoid. Journ. Exp. Med. XXXVI. 45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flexner, S. (1922). Experimental Epidemiology. Introductory. Journ. Exp. Med. XXXVI. 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, C. J. (1922). An Outbreak of Mouse Typhoid and its attempted Control by Vaccination. Journ. Exp. Med. XXXVI. 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Topley, W. W. C. (1919). The Spread of Bacterial Infection. Lancet, II. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Topley, W. W. C. (1921 a). The Spread of Bacterial Infection. Some characteristics of long-continued epidemics. Journ. of Hyg. XIX. 350.Google Scholar
Topley, W. W. C. (1921 b). The Spread of Bactorial Infection. The potential infectivity of a surviving mouse-population, and their resistance to subsequent epidemics of the same disease. Journ. Exp. Med. XX. 103.Google Scholar
Topley, W. W. C. (1922 a). The Spread of Bacterial Infection. Some characteristics of the pre-epidemic phase. Journ. Exp. Med. XXI. 10.Google Scholar
Topley, W. W. C. (1922 b). The Spread of Bacterial Infection. The effect of dispersal during the preepidemic stage, and of subsequent re-aggregation. Journ. Exp. Med. XXI. 20.Google Scholar