Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-31T14:16:27.434Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The source of infection in Pemphigus neonatorum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

M. T. Parker  and
J. Kennedy
M. T. Parker
Affiliation:
From the Public Health Laboratory, Carmarthen
J. Kennedy
Affiliation:
From the Public Health Laboratory, Carmarthen
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

An outbreak of eighteen cases of pemphigus neonatorum in a maternity department is described.

Strains of Staph. aureus isolated from the infants, the mothers and the staff during several weeks of intensive investigations were classified by phage typing.

The findings indicated that, during the latter part of the outbreak at least, the adults were not the source of infection.

There was evidence of wide dissemination of the epidemic strain of Staph. aureus among the healthy infants in the nursery. It is suggested that the main path of infection was from infant to infant.

Methods of controlling established outbreaks are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 47 , Issue 2 , June 1949 , pp. 213 - 219
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1949

References

REFERENCES

Allison, V. D. & Hobbs, , Betty, C.. (1947). Brit. Med. J. 2, 1.Google Scholar
Cadness-Graves, B., Williams, R., Haepek, G. J., & Miles, A. A., (1943). Lancet, 1, 736.Google Scholar
Chapman, G. H., (1945). J. Bact. 50, 201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowan, S. T., (1939). J. Path. Bact. 48, 169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, J. T. & Walker, , Jacqueline, , (1942). J. Hyg., Camb., 42, 474.Google Scholar
Elliott, S. D., Gillespie, E. H., & Holland, E., (1941). Lancet, 1, 169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisk, A., (1940). Brit. J. Exp. Path. 21, 311.Google Scholar
Gillespie, E. H., Devenish, E. A., & Cowan, S. T., (1939). Lancet, 2, 870.Google Scholar
Hobbs, Betty C., (1944). Mon. Bull. Min. Hlth Publ. Hlth Lab. Serv. 3, 11.Google Scholar
Knott, F. A., & Blaikley, J. B., (1944). J. Obstet. Gynaec. 51, 386.Google Scholar
Mcfarlan, A. M., (1938). Brit. Med. J. 2, 939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, G. C., Sims-Roberts, , Carol, & Cook, G. T., (1947). Mon. Bull. Min. Hlth Publ. Hlth Lab. Serv. 6, 13.Google Scholar
Williams, R. E. O., (1946). J. Path. Bact. 58, 259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, G. S., & Atkinson, J. D., (1945). Lancet, 1, 647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar