Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T11:14:14.680Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Some rodenticidal properties of coumatetralyl

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

J. H. Greaves
Affiliation:
Infestation Control Laboratory, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Tolworth, Surrey
Priscilla Ayres
Affiliation:
Infestation Control Laboratory, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Tolworth, Surrey
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The toxicity and palatability of coumatetralyl (3-(α-tetralyl)-4-hydroxycoumarin) to rats (Rattus norvegicus Berk.) were investigated in the laboratory by means of feeding tests. Animals resistant to warfarin (3-(α-acetonylbenzyl)-4-hydroxy-coumarin) and warfarin-resistant rats from infestations refractory to coumatetralyl, as well as non-resistant animals, were employed in the tests.

Medium oatmeal containing a concentration of 0·1% coumatetralyl was not markedly less palatable than the same food unpoisoned. In comparison warfarin at 0·05% but not at 0·025% was significantly less readily eaten than the plain food. Coumatetralyl at 0·05% and 0·005% was about as toxic as 0·005% warfarin is reported to be to non-resistant rats. Warfarin-resistant rats were significantly less susceptible to coumatetralyl than were non-resistant rats. Warfarin-resistant rats from an infestation refractory to coumatetralyl were significantly less susceptible to coumatetralyl than were animals from other sources.

It is considered that coumatetralyl at concentrations of the order of 0·05% in bait would be a good alternative to warfarin against non-resistant rats. While it would be expected that, at this concentration, coumatetralyl would often give good results against warfarin-resistant infestations, this use might eventually produce an increase in the incidence of resistance to both anticoagulants.

We thank Baywood Chemicals Ltd., for supplying the coumatetralyl used in this work. We are also indebted to several colleagues for supplying wild rats and information on field investigations and to Messrs G. Snell and P. Romer for technical assistance.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1969

References

REFERENCES

Drummond, D. C. & Wilson, E. J. (1968). Laboratory investigations of resistance to warfarin of Rattus norvegicus Berk. in Montgomeryshire and Shropshire. Ann. appl. Biol., 61, 303–12.Google ScholarPubMed
Greaves, J. H. & Ayres, P. (1967). Heritable resistance to warfarin in rats. Nature, Lond. 215, 877–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultze, G. (1965) Rat eradication and maintenance of the achieved state of clearance, from the aspect of the pest control operator. Pflanzenschutz-Nachricht. Bayer 18, 173–82.Google Scholar