Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T04:30:36.413Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some new observations bearing on the nature of the pleuropneumonia-like organism known as L1 associated with Streptobacillus moniliformis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

Emmy Klieneberger
Emmy Klieneberger
Affiliation:
From the Lister Institute, Elstree, Herts
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The new data presented show that the life cycle of the L1 organism separated from cultures of Streptobacillus moniliformis corresponds in many respects to that of pleuropneumonia. It seems therefore justifiable to classify it with the group of pleuropneumonia-like organisms and not with the bacteria. Its peculiar life cycle, including the formation of elementary reproductive corpuscles, a process previously described for pleuropneumonia, but not occurring in bacteria, is regarded as strong evidence in favour of the conception that Str. moniliformis is composed of two genetically different microbes, a Streptobacillus and the LI organism. Cross-absorption tests between Str. moniliformis and the LI organism have shown that these organisms possess different serological affinities.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 42 , Issue 5 , October 1942 , pp. 485 - 497
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1942

References

REFERENCES

Brown, T. McP., & Nunemaker, J. C., (1942). Bull. Johns Hopk. Hosp. 70, 201.Google Scholar
Dawson, M. H., & Hobby, G. L., (1939). Trans. Ass. Amer. Phys. 54, 329.Google Scholar
Dienes, L., (1938). Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol, N.Y., 39, 365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dienes, L., (1939 a). J. Infect. Dis. 65, 24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dienes, L., (1939 b). Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol., N.Y., 42, 636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dienes, L., (1940). Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol., N.Y., 43, 703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dienes, L., & Edsall, G., (1937). Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol., N.Y., 36, 740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisler, M. v., (1909). Zbl. Bakt. Orig. 51, 546.Google Scholar
Farrell, E., Lordi, G. H., & Vogel, J., (1939). Arch. Intern. Med. 64, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heilman, F. R., (1941 a). J. Infect. Dis. 69, 32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heilman, F. R., (1941 b). J. Infect. Dis. 69, 45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klieneberger, E., (1930). Ergebn. Hyg. Bakt. 11, 499.Google Scholar
Klieneberger, E., (1934). J. Path. Bact. 39, 409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klieneberger, E., (1935). J. Path. Bact. 40, 93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klieneberger, E., (1936). J. Path. Bact. 42, 587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klieneberger, E., (1938). J. Hyg., Camb., 38, 458.Google Scholar
Klieneberger, E., (1940). J. Hyg., Camb., 40, 204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klieneberger, E., & Smiles, J., (1942). J. Hyg., Camb., 42, 110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, P., & Sternberg, K., (1931). Zbl. Bakt. Orig. 121, 113.Google Scholar
Mackie, T. J., Van Rooyen, C. R., & Gilroy, E., (1933). Brit. J. Exp. Path. 14, 132.Google Scholar
Partridge, S. M., & Klieneberger, E., (1941). J. Path. Bact. 52, 219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinow, C. F., (1942). Proc. Roy. Soc. B, 130, 299.Google Scholar
Sabin, A. B., (1941). Bact. Rev. 5, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Theobald, (1918). J. Exp. Med. 28, 333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Theobald, (1921 a). J. Exp. Med. 33, 441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Theobald, (1921 b). J. Exp. Med. 34, 593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Wilson, (1941). J. Path. Bact. 53, 29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, S., (1941). Aust. J. Exp. Biol. Med. Sci. 19, 255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar