Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T23:25:16.413Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Some experiments relating to artificial immunity in enzootic pneumonia of pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

R. F. W. Goodwin
Affiliation:
School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge
Ruth G. Hodgson
Affiliation:
School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge
P. Whittlestone
Affiliation:
School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge
Rosemary L. Woodhams
Affiliation:
School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Hysterectomy-produced, colostrum-deprived pigs were injected twice with formalinized antigen prepared from the J strain of Mycoplasma suipneumoniae; the first injection was with Freund's adjuvant and the second injection without adjuvant. The immunity of these animals was tested by inoculating them intranasally with different doses of lung suspension prepared from cases of enzootic pneumonia. Two of the pigs were not killed shortly after infection, but were kept and challenged with enzootic pneumonia in order to compare the serology of experimentally-injected animals with the serology of the immune state following the experimentally-induced disease.

In a second main experiment, a pregnant sow was injected twice with nonformalinized antigen without adjuvant, and her litter was subsequently exposed to the disease at 7 days of age after suckling naturally from birth.

There was no evidence to suggest that the injections had protected the pigs in the first experiment against a high dose of infection, but they may have given some protection against low doses. The piglets suckled by the injected sow were not protected against two different doses of infection.

Serum samples taken at different stages were examined by the metabolic inhibition (MI) test, the indirect-haemagglutination (IHA) test, the complement fixation (CF) test and the gel-diffusion precipitin test, using M. suipneumoniae as antigen.

Serum samples taken before injection in the first experiment were all negative in the MI test and they became positive after the injections of antigen. However, 1 the highest MI titres obtained were not associated with obvious immunity; nor was the development of true immunity after experimental infection associated with a change in MI titre.

In the first experiment, substantial IHA titres (over 20,000) were recorded by 14 days after the second injection of antigen. Again, there was no correlation between the IHA titres and the area of pneumonia following experimental infection. In the sow experiment, IHA titres developed after the first injection and increased after the second; a high IHA titre occurred in the colostrum and titres of 320 or more were present in the piglets 7 days after birth.

The CF titres appeared earlier than the IHA titres but did not increase so markedly thereafter. Once more, there was no correlation between the titre before infection and the area of pneumonia afterwards.

In the gel-diffusion test, precipitins were demonstrated in all the post-injection serum samples tested, most of the samples being positive after the first injection. Precipitins were also demonstrated in the colostrum of the injected sow and in her uninjected litter at 7 days of age.

From these experiments it was concluded that, as judged by the development of pneumonic lesions and in marked contrast to the known immunizing effect of the disease itself, injections of antigen given in this manner had little or no protective effect against the dose levels of infection used. Nevertheless, the titres obtained in the MI, IHA and CF tests were comparable with those obtained earlier in pigs that were strongly immune, which provides further evidence for the suggestion that these tests do not measure protective immunity.

Miss Elaine Repworth provided technical assistance. Most of the expenses of this work, including the salary of two of the authors (R. G. H. and R. L. W.) were met by a grant from the Agricultural Research Council.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1969

References

Goodwin, R. F. W., Hodgson, R. G., Whittlestone, P. & Woodhams, R. L. (1969). Immunity in experimentally induced enzootic pneumonia of pigs. J. Hyg., Camb. 67, 193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, R. F. W., Pomeroy, A. P. & Whittlestone, P. (1965). Production of enzootic pneumonia in pigs with a mycoplasma. Vet. Rec. 77, 1247.Google Scholar
Goodwin, R. F. W., Pomeroy, A. P. & Whittlestone, P. (1967). Characterization of Mycoplasma suipneumoniae: a mycoplasma causing enzootic pneumonia of pigs. J. Hyg., Camb. 65, 85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, R. F. W., Pomeroy, A. P. & Whittlestone, P. (1968). Attempts to recover Mycoplasma suipneumoniae from experimental and natural cases of enzootic pneumonia in pigs. J. Hyg., Camb. 66, 595.Google ScholarPubMed
Goodwin, H. F. W. & Whittlestone, P. (1960). Experiences with a scheme for supervising pig herds believed to be free of enzootic pneumonia (virus pneumonia). Vet. Rec. 72, 1029.Google Scholar
Goodwin, R. F. W. & Whittlestone, P. (1967). The detection of enzootic pneumonia in pig herds. I. Eight years general experience with a pilot control scheme. Vet. Rec. 81, 643.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lannek, N. & Börnfors, S. (1957). Immunity to enzootic pneumonia in pigs following recovery from the disease. Nord. VetMed. 9, 91.Google Scholar
Ouchterlony, Ö. (1964). Gel-diffusion techniques. In Immunological Methods. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific publications.Google Scholar
Roberts, P. H. (1968). Serological diagnosis of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae infection in pigs. Vet. Rec. 82, 362.Google Scholar