Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T16:17:44.077Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some chemical and bacterial characteristics of bottom deposits from lakes and estuaries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

L. A. Allen ,
J. Grindley  and
Eileen Brooks
L. A. Allen
Affiliation:
Water Pollution Research Laboratory, Langley Road, Watford, Herts.
J. Grindley
Affiliation:
Water Pollution Research Laboratory, Langley Road, Watford, Herts.
Eileen Brooks
Affiliation:
Water Pollution Research Laboratory, Langley Road, Watford, Herts.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Chemical and bacteriological examination of muds from sources differing widely in the degree of pollution to which they were subject showed great differences in the contents of carbon, nitrogen and sulphide. These differences were not correlated with differences in the severity of faecal pollution. The amount of organic matter available for growth of micro-organisms in the mud of different depths was not reflected in the figures for organic carbon. A convenient index of this factor was obtained by measuring the volume of gas evolved during anaerobic digestion over a prolonged period of incubation. The rate of evolution was increased by the addition of an inoculum of digested sludge from a sewage works.

Sulphate-reducing bacteria appeared to be of two different types. In samples of mud from fresh-water lakes much higher counts were usually obtained in a medium containing comparatively low concentrations of inorganic salts and of lactate than in a medium containing much higher concentrations of these constituents. In samples from locations where conditions were more saline the reverse was usually true.

Counts of Bact. coli and of Strep, faecalis together probably constitute the best index of faecal pollution in the examination of samples of mud. These organisms are, however, largely confined to the surface layers.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 51 , Issue 2 , June 1953 , pp. 185 - 194
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1953

References

Allen, L. A. (1946). Recent developments in the microbiology of retting. Part I. The microbial flora in different systems of retting. J. Soc. chem. Ind., Lond., 65, 365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, L. A., Brooks, E. & Williams, I. L. (1949). Effect of treatment at the sewage works on the numbers and types of bacteria in sewage. J. Hyg., Camb., 47, 303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allen, L. A., Pasley, S. M. & Pierce, M. A. F. (1952). Some factors affecting the viability of faecal bacteria in water. J. gen. Microbiol. 7, 36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alsterberg, G. (1927). Bot. Notiser, 255. (Quoted by Waksman & Hotchkiss, 1938.)Google Scholar
Anderson, D. Q. (1939). Distribution of organic matter in marine sediments and its availability to further decomposition. J. Mar. Res. 2, 225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boysen-Jensen, B. (1914). Rep. Danish biol. Sta. 22, 5. (Quoted by Waksman, 1933.)Google Scholar
Department of Scientific and Industrial Research (1938). Effect of discharge of crude sewage into the estuary of the River Mersey on the amount and hardness of the deposit in the estuary. Tech. Pap. Wat. Pollut. Res., Lond., no. 7. H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Hannay, C. L. & Norton, I. L. (1947). Enumeration, isolation and study of faecal streptococci from river water. Proc. Soc. appl. Bact. no. 1, 39.Google Scholar
Hotchkiss, M. (1923). Bacterial studies on the Imhoff tanks and sprinkling filter bed. Bull. N. J. agric. Exp. Sta. no. 390, 49.Google Scholar
Kusnetzow, S. I. (1935). Microbiological researches in the study of the oxygenous regimen oflakes. Verh. int. Ver. Limnol. 7, 562.Google Scholar
Lloyd, B. (1931). Muds of the Clyde sea area. II. Bacterial content. J. Mar. biol. Ass. U.K. 17, 751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, L. P. (1949). Stimulation of hydrogen sulphide formation by sulphate-reducing bacteria. Contr. Boyce Thompson Inst. 15, 467.Google Scholar
Moore, H. B. (1931). The muds of the Clyde sea area. III. Chemical and physical conditions; rate and nature of sedimentation; and fauna. J. Mar. biol. Ass. U.K. 17, 325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mortimer, C. H. (1942). The exchange of dissolved substances between mud and water in lakes. J. Ecol. 30, 147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearsall, W. H. (1921). The development of vegetation in the English Lakes, considered in relation to the general evolution of glacial lakes and rock basins. Proc. roy. Soc. B, 92, 259.Google Scholar
Pearsall, W. H. & Lind, E. M. (1942). Distribution of the phytoplankton in some northwest Irish loughs. Proc. R. Irish Acad. 48 B, 1.Google Scholar
Pearsall, W. H. & Pennington, W. (1947). Ecological history of the English Lake District. J. Ecol. 34, 137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennington, W. (1943). Lake sediments: the bottom deposits of the North basin of Windermere, with special reference to the diatom succession. New Phytol. 42, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raymond, P. E. & Stetson, H. C. (1931). A new factor in the transportation and distribution of marinesediments. Science, 73, 105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rittenberg, S. C. (1940). Bacteriological analysis of some long cores of marine sediments. J. Mar. Res. 3, 191.Google Scholar
Savage, W. G. (1905). Bacteriological examination of tidal mud as an index of pollution of the river. J. Hyg., Camb., 5, 146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Savage, W. G. & Read, W. J. (1916). The significance of streptococci in water supplies. J. Hyg., Camb., 15, 334.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, C. B. (1940). Bacteriology of freshwater. I. Distribution of bacteria in English lakes. J. Hyg., Camb., 40, 616.Google Scholar
Twenhofel, W. H. & Broughton, W. A. (1939). The sediments of Crystal Lake, an oligotrophic lake in Vilas County, Wisconsin. Amer. J. Sci. 237, 231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waksman, S. A. (1929). Trans. 2nd Comm. Int. Soc. Soil Sci. (Budapest), Pt A, 172. (Quoted by Waksman, 1933.)Google Scholar
Waksman, S. A. (1933). On the distribution of organic matter in the sea bottom and the chemical nature and origin of marine humus. Soil. Sci., 36, 125.Google Scholar
Waksman, S. A. & Hotchkiss, M. (1938). On the oxidation of organic matter in marine sediments by bacteria. J. Mar. Res. 1, 101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zobell, C. E. (1946). Marine Microbiology. Waltham, Massachusetts: Chronica Botanica Co.Google Scholar
Zobell, C. E. & Anderson, D. Q. (1936). Vertical distribution of bacteria in marine sediments. Bull. Amer. Ass. Petrol. Geol. 20, 258.Google Scholar
Zobell, C. E. & Feltham, C. B. (1942). The bacterial flora of a marine mud flat as an ecological factor. Ecology, 23, 69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar