Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T15:51:19.621Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Solubility of Vi Antigen of Salmonella Typhi

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The observations reported here show that the T Vi antigen is effective in stimulating antibodies when it is attached to the cells. It is also clear that the Vi antigen is readily removed in aqueous solutions, but in such organic solvents as acetone, chloroform, ether, alcohol, carbon tetrachloride and benzene it is retained by the cell. In alcohol-water mixtures the Vi antigen is progressively more soluble in those solutions where the alcohol concentration is less than 70 %. However, its solubility in water is limited, and by making progressively heavier suspensions it was found that a point is reached at which Vi antigen is retained by the cell, the suspending solution apparently being saturated. Such an aqueous suspension is able to stimulate the production of Vi antibody.

The administration of dried organisms in peanut oil resulted in the production of antibodies against both O and Vi antigens. This was in contradistinction to the results obtained when mineral oil, mineral oil + saline, or peanut oil + saline were used: in these cases the O antibody titre was lower and Vi antibodies were produced in low titre or not at all. It seems clear that the presence of water in the vaccine has the effect of removing the antigenicity of the Vi hapten; water-free, vegetable-oil vaccine is suggested by these studies as an effective agent for immunizing against all of the antigens of Salmonella typhi. The use of such a vaccine in producing active and passive immunity in animals is discussed in the paper which follows.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1956

References

Chu, C. Y. & Hoyt, R. E. (1954). Reactions of TVi and Ballerup Vi haptens with antisera against Vi-coated erythrocytes. J. Hyg., Camb., 52, 100–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felix, A. (1941). A new type of typhoid and paratyphoid vaccine. Brit. med. J. 1, 391–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Felix, A. (1951). The preparation, testing and standardization of typhoid vaccine. J. Hyg., Camb., 49, 268–87.Google ScholarPubMed
Felix, A. (1952). The properties of different Salmonella Vi antigens. J. Hyg., Camb., 50, 515–39.Google ScholarPubMed
Felix, A. & Anderson, E. S. (1951). The immunizing potency of alcohol-killed and alcohol-preserved typhoid vaccine after storage for ten years. J. Hyg., Camb., 49, 288–97.Google ScholarPubMed
Felix, A. & Bhatnagar, S. S. (1935). Further observations on the properties of the Vi antigen of B. typhosus and its corresponding antibody. Brit. J. exp. Path. 16, 422–34.Google Scholar
Freund, J. (1951). The effect of paraffin oil and mycobacteria on antibody formation and sensitization. Amer. J. clin. Path. 21, 645–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gohar, M. A. & Elian, A. (1942). Comparison of some methods of sterilization of antityphoid vaccines. J. trop. Med. (Hyg.), 45, 41–4.Google Scholar
Kauffmann, F. (1951). Enterobacteriaceae. Copenhagen: Einar Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Landy, M. (1953). Enhancement of the immunogenicity of typhoid vaccine by retention of the Vi antigen. Amer. J. Hyg. 58, 148–64.Google Scholar
Mudd, S., Felton, H. M. & Smolens, J. (1948). Responses of human subjects to vaccines in saline-in-mineral oil emulsions. II. Hemophilus pertussis vaccines. J. Immunol. 58, 41–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peluffo, C. A. (1941). Stability of Vi antigen of Salmonella typhi. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol., N. Y., 48, 340–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rainsford, S. G. (1942). The preservation of Vi antigen in T.A.B.C. vaccine. J. Hyg., Camb., 42, 297322.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spaun, J. (1951). On the determination of Vi antibodies by hemagglutination. Acta path. microbiol. scand. 29, 416–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar