Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T09:01:36.615Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Signs and symptoms in common colds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

D. A. J. Tyrrell
Affiliation:
MRC Common Cold Unit, Harvard Hospital, Coombe Road, Sailsbury, Wilts, SP2 8BW, UK
S. Cohen
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA
J. E. Schilarb
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The patterns of disease caused by five common viruses which infect the respiratory tract are described. The viruses were strains of rhinovirus types 2, 9, and 14, a strain of coronavirus type 229E and of respiratory syncytial virus. Volunteers were given nasal drops containing a low infections dose of one of the viruses, quarantined from 2 days before to 5 days after inoculation, and examined daily by a clinician using a standard checklist of respiratory signs and symptoms. Only subjects who developed clinical illness accompanied by viral shedding and/or specific antibody production were analysed [n = 116]. The results confirm indication from earlier studies that the main difference between colds induced by different viruses is in duration of the incubation period. Patterens of symptom development were not substantially different with different viruses. Analyses of signs and symptoms in different categories, e.g. nasal symptoms v. coughing, justify treatment with different drugs either successively or simultaneously.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

References

1.Roden, AT. Variations in the clinical pattern of experimentally induced colds. J Hyg 1963; 61: 231–00.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Tyrrell, DAJ, Bynoe, ML, Peterson, BK, Sutton, RNP, Pereira, MS. Inoculation of human volunteers with parainfluenza viruses types 1 and 3 (HA1 and HA2). BMJ 1959; 2: 909–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Taylor-Robinson, D, Bynoe, ML. Para-influenza 2 virus infection in afult volunteers. J Hyg 1963; 61: 407–17.Google Scholar
4.Buckland, FE, Bynoe, ML, Tyrrell, DAJ. Experimental infection of human volunteers with the U-virus – a strain of echo virus type 11. J Hyg 1959; 57: 274–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Cohen, S, Tyrrell, DAJ, Smith, AP. Psychological stress and susceptibility to the common cold. N Engl J Med 1991; 325: 606–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Bears, AS, Reed, SE. The study of antiviral compounds in volunteers. In: Oxford, JS, ed. Chemoprophylaxis and virus infections, Vol. 2. Cleveland: CRC Press, 1977: 2755.Google Scholar
7.Phillpotts, RJ. Clones of MRC-C cells may be superior to the parent line for the culture of 229E-like strains of human respiratory coronavirus. J Virol Methods 1983; 6: 267–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Al Nakib, W, Tyrrell, DAJ. Picornaviridae: rhinoviruses – common cold viruses. In: Lennette, EM, Halonen, P, Murphy, FA, eds. Laboratory diagnosis of infectious diseases: principles and practice. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag, 1988; Vol. 2 723–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Barclay, WS, Al Nakib, W. An ELISA for the detection of rhinovirus specific antibody in serum and nasal secretion. J Virol Methods 1987; 15: 5364.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Callow, KA, Tyrrell, DAJ, Shaw, RJ, Fitzharris, P, Wardlaw, AJ, Kay, AB. Influence of atopy on the clinical manifestations of coronavirus infection in adult volunteers. Clin Allergy 1988; 18: 119–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Bradburne, Af, Bynoe, ML, Tyrrell, DAJ. Effects of a ‘new’ human respiratory in volunteers. BMJ 1967; 2: 767–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Andries, K, Dewindt, B, Snokes, J, Wilebrords, R, Stokbroekx, R, Lewi, PJ. A comparative test of fifteen compounds against all known human rhinovirus serotypes as a basis for a more rational screening program. Antiviral Res 1991; 16: 213'25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Medical Research Council Working Party on Acute Respiratory Virus Infections. A collaborative study of the aetiology of acute respiratory infections in Britain. BMJ 1965; 2: 319–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Hammond, BJ, Tyrrell, DAJ. A mathematical model of common-cold epidemies on Tristan da Cunha. J Hyg 1971; 69: 423–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Nagington, J, Rubenstein, D. Respiratory viruses. In: Weatherall, DJ, Ledingham, JGG, Warrell, DA, eds. Oxford textbook of medicine, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 1987: 5.55.Google Scholar