Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T18:32:00.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Serological studies during the 1953 epidemic of influenza A in New York State

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

C. H. Stuart-Harris ,
Gladys M. Gnesh  and
Irving Gordon
C. H. Stuart-Harris
Affiliation:
Division of Laboratories and Research, State of New York Department of Health, Albany, N.Y., USA
Gladys M. Gnesh
Affiliation:
Division of Laboratories and Research, State of New York Department of Health, Albany, N.Y., USA
Irving Gordon
Affiliation:
Division of Laboratories and Research, State of New York Department of Health, Albany, N.Y., USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A number of workers have shown that antibodies to the influenza A viruses which are demonstrable in the sera of normal adults undergo periodic fluctuations in titre related to epidemic occurrence of the disease. The rise in antibodies accompanying infection and demonstrable by neutralization, agglutination-inhibition and complement-fixation tests is used as a method of diagnosis which is admitted to be of greater sensitivity than actual recovery of virus from the throat. Studies of the population during an epidemic have also revealed the existence of subclinical infection with rise in antibodies comparable to that occurring in those suffering clinical illnesses. But surveys of sera from large samples of the population show no general upward shift in antibody levels unless an actual epidemic occurs (Martin, 1940). The studies made by Francis, Magill, Rickard & Beck (1937), Hoyle & Fairbrother (1937), Rickard, Lennette & Horsfall (1940) and Martin (1940) also indicate the relative impermanence of the enhanced antibody levels consequent upon an epidemic. A relatively rapid decrease in antibody is shown both by the neutralization and complement-fixation tests during the 3–6 months after an epidemic and then a slower fall occurs until the next epidemic again causes a rise in titres. There have, however, been relatively few studies on large samples of populations situated in different geographical areas before and during an outbreak.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 52 , Issue 2 , June 1954 , pp. 211 - 224
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1954

References

REFERENCES

Chu, C. M., Andrewes, C. H. & Gledhill, A. W. (1950). Bull. World Hlth Org. 3, 187.Google Scholar
Dalldorf, G. & Rice, C. E. (1947). Amer. J. Med. 2, 35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Francis, T., Magill, T. P., Rickard, E. R. & Beck, M. D. (1937). Amer. J. publ. Hlth, 27, 1141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoyle, L. & Fairbrother, R. W. (1937). Brit. med. J. 1, 655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoyle, L. & Fairbrother, R. W. (1947). Brit. med. J. 2, 991.Google Scholar
Hoyle, L. (1948). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth Lab. Serv. 7, 114.Google Scholar
Isaacs, A. & Andrewes, C. H. (1951). Brit. med. J. ii, 921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, A. E. (1940). J. Hyg., Camb., 40, 104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rickard, E. R., Lennette, E. H. & Horsfall, F. L. Jr (1940). Publ. Hlth Rep., Wash., 55, 2146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wadsworth, A. B., Maltaner, E. & Maltaner, F. (1931). J. Immunol. 21, 313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wadsworth, A. B., Maltaner, F. & Maltaner, E. (1938). J. Immunol. 35, 93, 105.Google Scholar
Wadsworth, A. B. (1939). Standard Methods of the Division of Laboratories and Research of the New York State Department of Health, 2nd ed., p. 213. Williams and Wilkins.Google Scholar
Wadswobth, A. B. (1947). Standard Methods of the Division of Laboratories and Research of the New York State Department of Health, 3rd ed., p. 361. Williams and Wilkins.Google Scholar