Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-31T13:09:05.264Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The serological response of sheep to infection with louping-ill virus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

H. Williams  and
H. Thorburn
H. Williams
Affiliation:
The Bacteriology Laboratory, Northern Regional Hospital Board, Inverness
H. Thorburn
Affiliation:
The Bacteriology Laboratory, Northern Regional Hospital Board, Inverness
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. An H.A.I. test for louping ill in sheep is described and its potentiality investigated alongside a standard C.F. test.

2. Sheep free from infection with, or which have not been vaccinated against, louping ill do not possess serum antibody demonstrable by the C.F., H.A.I. or neutralization techniques as described here.

3. After the administration of commercial vaccine followed by infective virus, C.F., H.A.I. and neutralizing antibodies are detectable. The C.F. antibodies are the least stable and in many instances disappear entirely from the peripheral circulation within 4 months of their appearance; they also appear to be susceptible to fluctuation unassociated with the disease. H.A.I. antibodies elicited under the same circumstances reach a high level early, are maintained for longer periods than C.F. antibodies, and fall to a basic level which tends to be maintained.

4. H.A.I. antibodies do not appear to be elicited in response to inoculation with vaccine only, in contrast to C.F. and neutralizing antibodies which are so elicited. It is suggested in these circumstances, measurement of H.A.I. antibody is the most useful of the serological tests available for surveys and for diagnostic purposes in sheep.

We wish to thank Mr A. Sharman, B.Sc., M.R.C.V.S., formerly of the North of Scotland College of Agriculture, Aberdeen, under whose care and supervision the flock was maintained and who inoculated and bled the animals.

We are particularly indebted to Dr C. E. Gordon Smith, of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, for valuable criticism and advice.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 59 , Issue 4 , December 1961 , pp. 437 - 447
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1961

References

Alston, J. M. & Gibson, T. (1931). Brit. J. cup. Path. 12, 82.Google Scholar
Brownlee, A. & Wilson, D. R. (1932). J. comp. Path. 45, 67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casals, J. & Brown, L. V. (1953). Proc. Soc. exp. Biol., N.Y., 83, 170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casals, J. & Brown, L. V. (1954). J. exp. Med. 99, 429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casals, J. & Webster, L. T. (1943). Science, 97, 246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casals, J. & Webster, L. T. (1944). J. exp. Med. 79, 45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Channock, R. M. & Sabin, A. B. (1953). J. Immunol. 70, 286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, D. H. & Casals, J. (1955). Proc. Soc. exp. Biol., N. Y., 88, 96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, D. H. & Casals, J. (1958). Amer. J. Trop. Med. & Hyg. 7, 561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, A. M. (1960). Brit. Vet. J. 116, 284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edward, D. G. ff. (1948). Brit. J. exp. Path. 29, 372.Google Scholar
Edward, D. G. ff. (1950). Brit. J. exp. Path. 31, 515.Google Scholar
Fulton, F. & Dumbell, K. (1949). J. gen. Microbiol. 3, 97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, W. S., Brownlee, A., Wilson, D. R. & Mcleod, J. (1932). J. comp. Path. 45, 106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurst, E. W. (1931). J. comp. Path. 44, 231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Likar, M. & Dane, D. S. (1958). Lancet, i, 456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, M. M., Osler, A. G., Bier, O. G. & Heidelberger, M. (1946). J. exp. Med. 84, 535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mcleod, J. & Gordon, W. S. (1932). J. comp. Path. 45, 240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pool, W. A., Brownlee, A. & Wilson, D. R. (1930). J. comp. Path. 43, 253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porterfield, J. S. (1957). Nature, Lond., 180, 1201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porterfield, J. S. (1960). Bull. World Hlth Org. 22, 373.Google Scholar
Rivers, T. M. (1948). Viral & Rickettsial Infections of Man. Philadelphia: Lippincott.Google Scholar
Rivers, T. M. & Schwentker, F. F. (1934). J. exp. Med. 59, 669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabin, A. B. (1951). Fed. Proc. 10, 573.Google Scholar
Sabin, A. B. & Buescher, E. L. (1950). Proc. Soc. exp. Biol., N.Y., 74, 222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salminen, A. (1960). Acta Virologica, 4, 17.Google Scholar
Sharman, G. A. M. (1960). Studies of the Major Factors Governing Sheep Mortality in Uist. Thesis submitted for the Ph.D. University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Smorodintseff, A. A. (1958). Progress in Medical Virology, vol. 1. (Edited by Berger, E. & Melnick, J. L..) Basel and New York: S. Karger.Google Scholar
Williams, H. E. (1958). Studies of the virus Louping ill. Thesis submitted for Ph.D. Edinburgh University.Google Scholar