Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T03:49:24.101Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The serological diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection: a comparison of complement fixation, haemagglutination and immunofluorescence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

S. A. Rousseau
Affiliation:
Public Health Laboratory, Luton and Dunslable Hospital
R. E. Tettmar
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology, RAF Institute of Pathology and Tropical Medicine, Halton
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A total of 193 sera were examined for antibody to Mycoplasma pneumoniae by three techniques – complement fixation (CF), haemagglutination (HA) and immunofluorescence (IF), the last method being used to assess IgM, IgG and IgA antibodies. The most reliable single test for diagnosis was HA, and the most useful combination of tests was HA with IF (IgM and IgG). The IgA IF was not found to be diagnostically helpful.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

References

REFERENCES

Biberfeld, G. (1968). Distribution of antibodies within 19S and 7S immunoglobulins following infection with Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Journal of Immunology 100, 338347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradstreet, C. M. P. & Taylor, C. E. D. (1962). Technique of compelement-fixation test applicable to the diagnosis of virus diseases. Monthly Bulletin of the Ministry of Health and the Public Health Laboratory Service 21, 96104.Google Scholar
Busolo, F., Tonin, E. & Meloni, G. A. (1983). Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for scrodiagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infections. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 18, 432435.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carter, J. B. & Carter, S. L. (1983). Acute-phase, indirect fluorescent antibody procedure for diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection. Annals of Clinical and Laboratory Science 13, 150155.Google ScholarPubMed
Chamberlain, P. & Saeed, A. A. (1983). A study of the specific IgM antibody response in Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection in man. Journal of Hygiene 90, 207211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fernald, G. W., Clyde, W. A. & Denny, F. W. (1967). Nature of the immune response to Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Journal of Immunology 98, 10281038.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hu, P. C., Powell, D. A., Albright, F., Gardner, D.E., Collier, A. M. & Clyde, W. A. (1983). A solid-phase radioimmunoassay for detection of antibodies against Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Immunology 11, 209213.Google ScholarPubMed
Raisanen, S. M., Suni, J. & Leinikki, P. O. (1980). Serological diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection by enzyme immunoassay. Journal of Clinical Pathology 33, 836840.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sillis, M. & Andrews, B. E. (1978). A simple test for Mycoplasma pneumoniae IgM. Zentralblatt filr Bakteriologie, Mikrobiologie und Hygiene. 1. Abteilung Originale A, Medizinische Mikrobiologie, Infeklionskrankheiten und Parasitologie 241, 239240.Google Scholar
Skaug, K., Eng, J., Orstavik, I. & Haug, K. W. (1976). The diagnostic value of determination of IgM antibodies against Mycoplasma pneumoniae by the indirect immunofluorescent antibody test. Ada Palhologica Microbiologica Scandinavica Section B 84, 170176.Google ScholarPubMed
Taylor, P. (1979). Evaluation of an indirect haemagglutination kit for the rapid serological diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infections. Journal of Clinical Pathology 32, 280283.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, P. (1983). Experience with Serodia-Myco indirect haemogglutination test in the serological diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infections. Mast Matters 19, 610.Google Scholar
Taylor, P. (1983). The relevance of raised indirect haemagglutination titres in sera with complement fixation titres of 1/40 or less collected during the current outbreak of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infections. Mast Matters 23, 2324.Google Scholar
Taylor-Robinson, D., Sobeslavsky, O., Jensen, K. E., Senterfit, L. B. & Cbanock, R. M. (1966). Serologic response to Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection. I. Evaluation of immunofluoresccncc, complement fixation, indirect haemagglutination and tetrazolium reduction inhibition tests for the diagnosis of infection. American Journal of Epidemiology 83, 287298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor-Robinson, D., Shirai, A., Sobeslavsky, O. & Chanock, R. M. (1966). Serologic response to Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection. II. Significance of antibody measured by different techniques. American Journal of Epidemiology 84, 301313.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Griethuysen, A. J. A., de Graaf, R., Van Druten, J. A. M., Heesen, F. W. A., Van Der Logt, J. T. M. & Van Loon, A. M. (1984). Use of the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the early diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology 3, 116121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wreghitt, T. G. & Sillis, M. (1985). A μ-capture ELISA for detecting Mycoplasma pneumoniae IgM: comparison with indirect immunofiuorescence and indirect ELISA. Journal of Hygiene 94, 217227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar