Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T03:58:03.849Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Serological Classification of Streptococcus pyogenes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

F. Griffith
F. Griffith
Affiliation:
From the Ministry's Pathological Laboratory
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The haemolytic streptococci associated with scarlet fever, tonsillitis, septic conditions, etc., belong to one group or species designated Streptococcus pyogenes.

Cultural and serological aids to the identification of Str. pyogenes are described.

The epidemiologically significant types of Str. pyogenes appear to be about 20 in number, though probably more than thirty type sera will be necessary for the complete analysis of the group. So far twenty-seven individual serological types have been defined.

The irregularities which have been observed in the agglutination reactions of streptococcal cultures are ascribed chiefly to variations in type-specificity.

Different colonies may give “type-specific” or “group” agglutination, and these distinctions are revealed macroscopically in the case of certain types by growth on homologous agglutinating serum agar.

Some examples are given of observations on the epidemiology of streptococcal infections in schools and other institutions.

The principles involved in the serological classification of a bacterial group are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 34 , Issue 4 , December 1934 , pp. 542 - 584
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1934

References

REFERENCES

Allison, V. D. and Gunn, W. (1932). Proc. Roy. Soc. Med. 25, 927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrewes, F. W. (1922). J. Path. and Bact. 25, 505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrewes, F. W. and Christie, E. M. (1932). Med. Res. Council, Special Report Series, No. 169.Google Scholar
Annual Reports of the Chief Medical Officer of the Ministry of Health, 1929 to 1933.Google Scholar
Coburn, A. P. and Pauli, R. H. (1932). J. Exp. Med. 56, 633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, M. H. (1934). J. Path. and Bact. 39, 323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dochez, A. R., Avery, O. T. and Lancefield, R. C. (1919). J. Exp. Med. 30, 179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, H. J. and Thomson, W. A. R. (1933). Edinb. Med. J. 40, 93.Google Scholar
Glover, J. A. and Griffith, F. (1930). Lancet, ii, 815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glover, J. A. and Griffith, F. (1931). Brit. M. J. ii, 521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golledge, S. V. (1932). Veterinary Record, 24 December.Google Scholar
Griffith, F. (1926). J. Hyg. 25, 385.Google Scholar
Griffith, F. (1927). J. Hyg. 26, 363.Google Scholar
Griffith, F. (1928). J. Hyg. 27, 113.Google Scholar
Griffith, F. (1933). Bull, mensuel Office Int. d'Hyg. publique, 25, fasc. no. 12.Google Scholar
Griffith, F. and Gunn, W. (1928). J. Hyg. 28, 250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hitchcock, C. H. (1924). J. Exp. Med. 42, 377.Google Scholar
Lancefield, R. C. (1933). J. Exp. Med. 57, 571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueller, J. H. and Klise, K. S. (1932). J. Inf. Dis. 52, 139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shwartzman, G. (1927). J. Exp. Med. 46, 497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J. (1926). J. Hyg. 25, 165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Todd, E. W. and Lancefield, R. C. (1928). J. Exp. Med. 48, 751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, A. (1932). Streptococci in Relation to Man in Health and Disease. Baillière, Tindall and Cox.Google Scholar