Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T22:40:20.055Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Serological Classification of Bacillus Diphtheriae

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

A. J. Eagleton  and
Edith M. Baxter
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Evidence is given that there exists a multiplicity of serological groups of B. diphtheriae.

2. Ten of these groups have been studied in this communication.

3. Into these ten groups could be placed all except 16 of 348 strains of virulent B. diphtheriae investigated.

4. A description of the technical difficulties encountered is included in the hope that this may prove of service to other workers.

Some evidence on the antigenic structures of different strains is advanced.

5. The application of this method of investigation to the problems of epidemiology is briefly discussed, and evidence of its value brought forward.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 22 , Issue 1 , October 1923 , pp. 107 - 122
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1923

References

REFERENCES

Bell, (1922). Journ. Roy. Army Med. Corps, XXXVIII. 48.Google Scholar
Bruno, (1898). Berlin klin. Wochenschr. 1127.Google Scholar
Durand, (1918). C. R. Soc. de Biol. 1011.Google Scholar
Durand, (1920) C. R. Soc. de Biol. 611.Google Scholar
Durand, (1921) C. R. Soc. de Biol. 982Google Scholar
Eagleton, and Baxter, (1921). Brit. Med. Journ. I. 775.Google Scholar
Eagleton, (1922). Brit. Med. Journ. I. 139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, , Mervyn, (1901). Suppl. to 31st Report Local Govt. Board, 436.Google Scholar
Guérin, Jean, (1921). C. R. Soc. de Biol. LXXXIV. 980.Google Scholar
Havens, (1920). Journ. of Infect. Dis. XXVI. 388.Google Scholar
Langer, (1916). Centralbl. f. Bakteriol. LXXVIII. 117.Google Scholar
Lipstein, (1903). Centralbl. f. Bakteriol., XXXIV. 421.Google Scholar
Lubowski, (1900). Zeitschr. f. Hygiene, XXXV. 87.Google Scholar
Mason, (1919). Military Surgeon, XLV. 560.Google Scholar
Nicolas, (1896). C. R. Soc. de Biol. 817.Google Scholar
Nicolas, (1898 a). C. R. Soc. de Biol. 627.Google Scholar
Nicolas, (1898 b). C. R. Soc. de Biol. 1001.Google Scholar
Nicolas, (1898 c). C. R. Soc. de Biol. 1127.Google Scholar
Nicolas, (1900). C. R. Soc. de Biol. 837.Google Scholar
Nicolle, (1898). Ann. Inst. Pasteur, XII. 186.Google Scholar
Park, (1922). Journ. of Immunology, VII. 243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schick, and Ersetting, (1903). Wiener klin. Wochenschr. 993.Google Scholar
Schwoner, (1902). Wiener klin. Wochenschr. 1274.Google Scholar
Van Riemsdijk, (1914). Centralbl. f. Bakteriol. LXXV. 256.Google Scholar
Przewoski, V. (1912). Centralbl. f. Bakteriol. LXV. 5.Google Scholar
Wassermann, (1902). Deutsche med. Wochenschr. XLIV. 785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar