Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:09:21.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A sensitive method for isolating Fusobacterium necrophorum from faeces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

G. R. Smith ,
S. A. Barton  and
L. M. Wallace
G. R. Smith
Affiliation:
Institute of Zoology, The Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London NW1 4RY
S. A. Barton
Affiliation:
Institute of Zoology, The Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London NW1 4RY
L. M. Wallace
Affiliation:
Institute of Zoology, The Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London NW1 4RY
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The isolation of Fusobacterium necrophorum present in small numbers in heavily contaminated material such as faeces or soil is hampered by the lack of an efficient selective medium and by the high minimum infective dose of the organism. A sensitive method for the detection and isolation of faecal strains of F. necrophorum type A was based on the subcutaneous injection of faeces, suspended (5% w/v) in broth culture of Actinomyces (Corynebacterium) pyogenes or Staphylococcus aureus to increase fusobacterial infectivity, into mice pretreated with clostridial antitoxins. When necrobacillosis developed F. necrophorum was identified microscopically in tissue from the advancing edge of the lesion and isolated on a partly selective medium.

The enhancement of fusobacterial infectivity produced by A. pyogenes and by S. aureus was high, but the latter was slightly the more efficient, enabling as few as 80 F. necrophorum organisms/g of faeces to be detected.

Use of the method showed that 3 of 16 wallabies had F. necrophorum in their faeces at the time of examination. Numerous epidemiological applications are suggested.

Type
Special Article
Information
Epidemiology & Infection , Volume 106 , Issue 2 , April 1991 , pp. 311 - 317
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

References

REFERENCES

1.Smith, GR. Anaerobic bacteria as pathogens in wild and captive animals. Symp Zool Soc Lond 1988; No. 60: 159–73.Google Scholar
2.Beerens, H, Fievez, L, Wattre, P. Observations concernant 7 souches appartenant aux espèces Sphaerophorus necrophorus, Sphaerophorus funduliformis, Sphaerophorus pseudonecrophorus. Annls Inst Pasteur Lille 1971; 121: 37–41.Google ScholarPubMed
3.Fales, WH, Teresa, GW. A selective medium for the isolation of Sphaerophorus necrophorus. Am J Vet Res 1972; 33: 2317–21.Google ScholarPubMed
4.Kanoe, M, Imagawa, H, Toda, M. Distribution of Fusobacterium necrophorum in bovine alimentary tracts. Bull Fac Agric Yamaguchi Univ 1975; 26: 161–72.Google Scholar
5.Berg, JN, Fales, WH, Scanlan, CM. Occurrence of anaerobic bacteria in diseases of the dog and cat. Am J Vet Res 1979; 40: 876–81.Google ScholarPubMed
6.Smith, GR, Till, D, Wallace, LM, Noakes, DE. Enhancement of the infectivity of Fusobacterium necrophorum by other bacteria. Epidemiol Infect 1989; 102: 447–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Smith, GR, Barton, SA, Wallace, LM. Further observations on enhancement of the infectivity of Fusobacterium necrophorum by other bacteria. Epidemiol Infect 1991; 106: 305–310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Smith, GR, Wallace, LM, Noakes, DE. Experimental observations on the pathogenesis of necrobacillosis. Epidemiol Infect 1990; 104: 73–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Smith, GR, Oliphant, JC, Parsons, R. The pathogenic properties of Fusobacterium and Bacteroides species from wallabies and other sources. J Hyg 1984; 92: 165–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Deacon, AG, Duerden, BI, Holbrook, WP. Gas-liquid chromatographic analysis of metabolic products in the identification of Bacteroidaceae of clinical interest. J Med Microbiol 1978; 11: 81–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Collee, JG, Duguid, JP, Fraser, AG, Marmion, BP, eds. In Mackie, and McCartney, practical medical microbiology. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1989: 58–9.Google Scholar
12.Wilson, GS, Miles, AA. In Topley and Wilsons principles of bacteriology, virology and immunity. 6th ed.London: Edward Arnold 1975; 2: 1655–6.Google Scholar