Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T16:45:57.942Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Salmonellosis in Northern Ireland, with special reference to pigs and salmonella-contaminated pig meal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

K. W. Newell
Affiliation:
Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Queen's University, Belfast
R. McClarin
Affiliation:
Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Queen's University, Belfast
C. R. Murdock
Affiliation:
Northern Ireland Hospitals Authority, Central Laboratory, Belfast
W. N. MacDonald
Affiliation:
Northern Ireland Hospitals Authority, Central Laboratory, Belfast
H. L. Hutchinson
Affiliation:
Veterinary Division, Ministry of Agriculture, Northern Ireland
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Salmonella incidents in Northern Ireland from 1951–58 are compared with the published findings in England and Wales.

2. Caecal swabs from 489 pigs killed in two bacon factories showed a salmonella isolation rate of 2%.

3. Salmonella organisms were isolated from twenty-three out of 100 samples of caecal faeces and from only six of 100 caecal swabs taken from the same animals. Three per cent of meat samples from these pigs and 70% of sausage samples from this meat contained Salmonellae.

4. Rectal swabs from 162 pigs on five farms producing infected pigs showed Salmonellae in 9% of those examined.

5. Twenty-four per cent of pig-meal samples taken on these farms contained Salmonellae, and the same salmonella types were found in the meal at the mill and in fish meal and bone meal before mixing.

6. It is probable that some salmonella types pass from feedingstuffs through pigs to human food and cause human infections.

We should like to express our thanks to Dr Joan Taylor of the Salmonella Reference Laboratory, Colindale, for typing many of the Salmonellae; to Mr J. Stuart of the Veterinary Division, Ministry of Agriculture, Northern Ireland, for help in sampling at an abattoir and on the farms; to the staff of the Northern Ireland Hospitals Authority, Central Laboratory, for technical assistance; to Mr J. Patton and Dr D. Luke for much help and advice at many stages of this inquiry; to Miss A. McCann for the secretarial work; to the Northern Ireland Hospitals Authority for a grant towards the expenses in 1958; and to our colleagues in the Local Authorities, General Practice, on the farms and in the factories who were always most helpful and co-operative.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1959

References

REFERENCES

Ewards, P. R. & Bruner, D. W. (1943). J. infect. Dis. 72, 58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galton, M. M., Smith, W. V., McElrath, H. B. & Hardy, A. B. (1954). J. infect. Dis. 96, 236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, W. & Sapiro-Hirsch, R. (1959). Harefuah, 54, no. 3, 57.Google Scholar
Hobbs, B. C. (1957). Sanitarian, 66, 95.Google Scholar
Hobbs, B. C. & Allison, V. D. (1954). Monthly Bull. Minist. Hlth Lab. Serv. 4, 63.Google Scholar
Hobbs, B. C., King, G. J. G. & Allison, V. D. (1945). Monthly Bull. Minist. Hlth Lab. Serv. 4, 40.Google Scholar
Hormaeche, E. & Salsamendi, R. (1936). Arch. urug. Med. 9, 665.Google Scholar
Leifson, E. (1935). J. Path. Bact. 40, 581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundbeck, H., Plazikowski, U. & Silverstolpe, L. (1955). J. appl. Bact. 18, no. 3, 535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacCready, R. A., Reardon, J. P. & Saphra, I. (1957). New Engl. J. Med. 256, 1121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCullough, N. R. & Eisele, C. W. (1951 a). J. infect. Dis. 88, 278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCullough, N. R. & Eisele, C. W. (1951 b). J. infect. Dis. 89, 209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonagh, V. P. & Smith, H. G. (1958). J. Hyg., Camb., 56, 2,271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcuse, K., Henze, B. & Pohle, H. D. (1957). Zbl. Bakt. I. Abt. Orig. 169, 493.Google Scholar
Report (1947). Spec. Rep. Ser. med. Res. Coun., Lond., no. 260.Google Scholar
Report (1950 a). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth Lab. Serv. 9, 148.Google Scholar
Report(1950 b). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth Lab. Serv. 9, 254.Google Scholar
Report(1951). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth Lab. Serv. 10, 228.Google Scholar
Report(1954). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth Lab. Serv. 13, 12.Google Scholar
Report(1955 a). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth Lab. Serv. 14, 34.Google Scholar
Report(1955 b). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth Lab. Serv. 14, 132.Google Scholar
Report(1955 c). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth Lab. Serv. 14, 203.Google Scholar
Report(1956). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth Lab. Serv. 15, 263.Google Scholar
Rohde, R. & Bischoff, J. (1956). Zbl. Bakt. I. Abt. Ref. 159, 145.Google Scholar
Scott, W. M. (1940). Proc. Roy. Soc. Med. 33, 366.Google Scholar
Staack, H. H. (1958). Arch. Hyg., Berl., 142, part 2, 105.Google Scholar
Walker, J. H. C. (1957). Lancet, ii, 283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar