Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T15:19:10.928Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Salmonella isolations in abattoirs in Greece

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

P. Vassiliadis
Affiliation:
The Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, University of Athens, Athens-609, and the Salmonella Reference Centre, Athens School of Hygiene
D. Trichopoulos
Affiliation:
The Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, University of Athens, Athens-609, and the Salmonella Reference Centre, Athens School of Hygiene
J. Papadakis
Affiliation:
The Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, University of Athens, Athens-609, and the Salmonella Reference Centre, Athens School of Hygiene
G. Politi
Affiliation:
The Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, University of Athens, Athens-609, and the Salmonella Reference Centre, Athens School of Hygiene
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The prevalence of salmonellas in drain swabs from three abattoirs of Athens was studied with the use of conventional methods of Salmonella isolation as well as with a new procedure which involves secondary enrichment from the usual selenite broth or Muller-Kauffmann's tetrathionate broth in Rappaport's medium slightly modified.

In all groups studied the secondary enrichment in Rappaport's medium led to an increase in the number of positive swabs, in the number of Salmonella serotypes, and in the total number of strains isolated.

The frequency of Salmonella isolations was higher in samples from abattoirs killing only pigs and lower in samples from abattoirs killing only cattle or only sheep.

The predominant serotype in abattoirs dealing with cattle was Salmonella tennessee, and S. typhimurium in abattoirs dealing with sheep. No predominant serotype was found in samples from abattoirs dealing mostly with pigs.

S. abony, S. drypool, S. emek, S. Indiana, S. muenchen and S. tennessee were isolated for the first time in Greece.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1970

References

REFERENCES

Edel, W. & Kampelmacher, E. H. (1968). Comparative studies on Salmonella isolation in eight European laboratories. Bulletin of the World Health Organisation 39, 487.Google ScholarPubMed
Georgala, D. L. & Boothroyd, M. (1964). A rapid immunofluorescence technique for detecting salmonellae in raw meat. Journal of Hygiene 62, 319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harvey, R. W. S. & Thompson, Scott (1953). Optimum temperature of incubation for isolation of salmonellae. Monthly Bulletin of the Ministry of Health and the Public Health Laboratory Service 12, 149.Google ScholarPubMed
Harvey, R. W. S. & Phillips, W. P. (1961). An environmental survey of bakehouses and abattoirs for Salmonellae. Journal of Hygiene 59, 93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harvey, R. W. S. & Price, T. H. (1967). The examination of samples infected with multiple salmonella serotypes. Journal of Hygiene 65, 423.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harvey, R. W. S. & Price, T. H. (1968). Elevated temperature incubation of enrichment media for the isolation of salmonellas from heavily contaminated materials. Journal of Hygiene 66, 377.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harvey, R. W. S., Price, T. H., Foster, D. W. & Griffiths, W. C. (1969). Salmonellas in sewage. A study in latent human infection. Journal of Hygiene 67, 517.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hynes, M. (1942). The isolation of intestinal pathogens by selective media. Journal of Pathology and Bacteriology 54, 193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jameson, J. E. (1962). A discussion of the dynamics of Salmonella enrichment. Journal of Hygiene 60, 193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jameson, J. E. (1963). A note on the isolation of salmonellae. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 26, 112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, A. P., Bennet, J. R. & Ellis, H. (1961). Salmonella food poisoning and abattoir-slaughtered meat. Monthly Bulletin of the Ministry of Health and the Public Health Laboratory Service 20, 229.Google Scholar
Mackie, T. J. & McCartney, J. E. (1956). Handbook of Practical Bacteriology, 9th ed., pp. 183–4. Edinburgh and London: Livingstone Ltd.Google Scholar
Martin, W. J. & Ewing, W. H. (1967). Isolation of Salmonella from food and food products. National Communicable Disease Center Publications. U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, pp. 123. Public Health Service, Communicable Disease Center, Atlanta, Georgia.Google Scholar
Moore, B. (1948). The detection of paratyphoid carriers in towns by means of sewage examination. Monthly Bulletin of the Ministry of Health and the Public Health Laboratory Service 7, 241.Google Scholar
Papadakis, J. (1965). An investigation for Salmonellae in the abattoirs of Athens. Doctoral thesis, Athens. (In Greek with a summary in English.)Google Scholar
Papadakis, J. (1968). Investigation for Salmonellae in the abattoirs of Athens. Acta microbiologica hellenica 2, 77.Google Scholar
Patéraki, E., Politi, G. & Vassiliadis, P. (1966). Recherche des Salmonella dans les ganglions mésentériques des pores et des bovins aux abattoirs d' Athénes. Archives de l' Institut Pasteur hellénique 12, 31.Google Scholar
Rappaport, F., Konforti, N. & Navon, B. (1956). A new enrichment medium for certain salmonellae. Journal of Clinical Pathology 9, 261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Report of a Working Party of the Public Health Laboratory Service (1964). Salmonellae in abattoirs, butcher shops and home-produced meat, and their relation to human infection. Journal of Hygiene 62, 283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valette, H. (1961). Recherches de Salmonelles dans les eaux usées et chez les pores cliniquement sains à Genève. Thèse de doctorat méd-vét., Genève.Google Scholar
Vassiliadis, P. (1968). Shigella, Salmonella choleraesuis and Arizona in Rappaport's medium. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 31, 367.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vassiliadis, P., Patéraki, E. & Politi, G. (1969). Salmonella dans les ganglions mésentériques des caprins et des ovins sains abattus en Grèce. Annales d' Hygiène de Langue Française 5, 91.Google Scholar