Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T02:41:58.054Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rubella-specific IgM reactivity in sera from cases of infectious mononucleosis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

P. Morgan-Capner ,
R. S. Tedder  and
J. E. Mace
P. Morgan-Capner
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Microbiology, King's College Hospital Medical School, London, SE5 8RX
R. S. Tedder
Affiliation:
Department of Virology, Middlesex Hospital Medical School, London, W1P 7PP
J. E. Mace
Affiliation:
Department of Virology, Middlesex Hospital Medical School, London, W1P 7PP
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Eight sera from 125 cases of infectious mononucleosis (IM) were reactive for rubella-specific IgM in an M-antibody capture radioimmunoassay. The reactivity of individual sera varied depending upon the source of the rubella antigen used in the assay. One serum gave strongly positive results with some rubella haemagglutinating antigens but negative results with others and may have contained an IgM antibody which was capable of distinguishing between strains of rubella virus.

If the diagnosis of rubella is based solely on detection in solid-phase immunoassay of rubella-specific IgM, IM should be excluded.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 90 , Issue 3 , June 1983 , pp. 407 - 413
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

References

REFERENCES

Carter, R. L. (1966). Antibody formation in infectious mononucleosis, II. Other 19S antibodies and false-positive serology. British Journal of Haematology 12, 268–275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cradock-Watson, J. E., Bourne, M. S. & Vandervelde, E. M. (1972). IgG, IgA and IgM responses in acute rubella determined by the immunofluorescent technique. Journal of Hygiene 70, 473–485.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Epstein, M. A. & Achong, B. G. (1977). Pathogenesis of infectious mononucleosis. Lancet ii, 1270–1272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henle, G. & Henle, W. (1979). The Virus as the Etiologic Agent of Infectious Mononucleosis: The Epstein—Barr Virus. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurtz, J. B., Mortimer, P. P., Mortimer, P. R., Morgan-Capner, P., Shafi, M. S. & White, G. B. B. (1980). Rubella antibody measured by radial haemolysis. Characteristics and performance of a simple screening method for use in diagnostic laboratories. Journal of Hygiene 84, 213–222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morgan-Capner, P., Davies, E. & Pattison, J. R. (1980). Rubella-specific IgM detection using Sephacryl S-300 gel filtration. Journal of Clinical Pathology 33, 1082–1085.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mortimer, P. P., Tedder, R. S., Hambling, M. H., Shafi, M. S., Burkhardt, F. & Schilt, U. (1981). Antibody capture radioimmunoassay for anti-rubella IgM. Journal of Hygiene 86, 139–153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pattison, J. R. & Dane, D. S. (1975). The detection of specific IgM antibodies following infection with rubella virus. Journal of Clinical Pathology 28, 377–382.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rott, R., Drzeniek, R., Saber, M. S. & Reichert, T. (1966). Blood group substances, Forssman and mononucleosis antigens in lipid-containing RNA viruses. Archiv für die Gesamte Virusforschung 19, 273–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tender, R. S., Yao, J. L. & Anderson, M. J. (1982). The production of monoclonal antibodies to rubella haemagglutinin and their use in antibody-capture assays for rubella-specific IgM. Journal of Hygiene 88, 335–350.Google Scholar
Urquhart, G. E. D. & Carson, H. G. (1982). Laboratory policy for rubella screening. Lancet ii, 1226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar