Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T14:53:51.437Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ribosomal RNA gene patterns of Helicobacter pylori from surgical patients with healed and recurrent peptic ulcers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

R. J. Owen
Affiliation:
National Collection of Type Cultures, Central Public Health Laboratory, London NW9 5HT, UK
J. Bickley
Affiliation:
National Collection of Type Cultures, Central Public Health Laboratory, London NW9 5HT, UK
A. Lastovica
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology, Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital
J. P. Dunn
Affiliation:
Department of Surgery, Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, Republic of South Africa
P. Borman
Affiliation:
National Collection of Type Cultures, Central Public Health Laboratory, London NW9 5HT, UK
C. Hunton
Affiliation:
National Collection of Type Cultures, Central Public Health Laboratory, London NW9 5HT, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Fifty–two strains of Helicobacter pylori were examined by DNA restriction endonuclease digestion, ribosomal (r)RNA gene probe hybridization and bio–typing. Most (49) strains originated from gastric (antral) biopsies of patients before or after elective surgery for duodenal ulcers. Chromosomal DNA Hind III ribopatterns showed 9 strain clusters of which the largest contained 12 strains each with 3 common bands (1·50, 3·45, and 4·26 kb) but which were heterogeneous with respect to biotype and total digest pattern. Isolates from post–operative patients with either healed or recurrent ulcers showed ribopattern heterogeneity and exhibited a similar distribution of H. pylori ribopattern types; no single type predominated in any patient group or was more highly associated with recurrent ulcers than with healed ulcers. Multiple isolates from two surgical patients had only minor genomic variations in each set whereas isolates from two brothers had different ribopatterns. We conclude that Hind III ribopatterns in conjunction with total digest patterns might provide the basis for future epidemiological typing studies.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

References

REFERENCES

1.Goodwin, CS, Armstrong, JA, Chilvers, T et al. , Transfer of Campylobacter pylori and Helicobacter mustelae to Helicobacter gen. nov. as Helicobacter pylori comb. nov. and Helicobacter mustelae comb. nov. respectively. Int J Syst Bact 1989; 39: 397405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Graham, DY. Campylobacter pylori and peptic ulcer disease. Gastroenterol 1989; 96: 615–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Rauws, EAJ, Tytgat, GNJ. Cure of duodenal ulcer associated with eradication of Helicobacter pylori. Lancet 1990; I: 1233–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Scott, N, Diement, R, Murday, V et al. , Helicobacter gastritis and intestinal metaplasia in a gastric cancer family. Lancet 1990; I: 728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Dwyer, B, Kaldos, J, Tee, W, Raisos, K. The prevalence of Campylobacter pylori in human populations. In: Rathbone, BJ, Heatley, RV, eds. Campylobacter pylori and gastroduodenal disease. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1989: 190–6.Google Scholar
6.Burnie, J, Lee, W, McNulty, C, Dent, J. Virulence of Campylobacter strains and degree of gastritis. Lancet 1988; I: 302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Figura, N, Guglielmetti, P, Rossolini, A et al. , Cytotoxin production by Campylobacter pylori strains isolated from patients with peptic ulcers and from patients with chronic gastritis only. J Clin Microbiol 1989; 27: 225–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Eaton, KA, Morgan, DR, Krakowka, S. Campylobacter pylori virulence factors in gnotobiotic piglets. Infect Immun 1989; 57: 1119–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Owen, RJ, Fraser, J, Costas, M, Morgan, D, Morgan, DR. Signature patterns of DNA restriction fragments of Helicobacter pylori before and after treatment. J Clin Pathol 1990; 43: 646–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Morgan, DD, Owen, RJ. Use of DNA restriction endonuclease digest and ribosomal RNA gene probe patterns to fingerprint Helicobacter pylori and Helicobacter mustelae isolated from human and animal hosts. Molec Cell Prob 1990; 4: 321–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Owen, RJ, Bickley, J, Costas, M, Morgan, DR. Genomic variation of Helicobacter pylori: application to identification of strains. Scand J Gastroenterol 1991; 26 (suppl. 181): 4350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Costas, M, Owen, RJ, Bickley, J, Morgan, DR. Molecular techniques for studying the epidemiology of infection by Helicobacter pylori. Scand J Gastroenterol 1991; 26 (suppl. 181): 2032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Cowan, ST. Cowan and Steels' manual for the identification of medical bacteria. 2nd ed.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
14.Owen, RJ, Martin, S, Borman, P. Rapid urea hydrolysis by gastric campylobacters. Lancet 1985; I: 111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Owen, RJ, Desai, M. Preformed enzyme profiling of Helicobacter pylori and Helicobacter mustelae from human and animal sources. Lett Appl Microbiol 1990; 11: 103–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Pitcher, DG, Saunders, NA, Owen, RJ. Rapid extraction of bacterial genomic DNA with guanidium thiocyanate. Lett Appl Microbiol 1989; 8: 151–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Pitcher, DG, Owen, RJ, Dyal, P, Beck, A. Synthesis of a biotinylated DNA probe to detect ribosomal RNA cistrons in Providencia stuartii. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1987; 48: 283–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Owen, RJ, Costas, M, Dawson, C. Application of different chromosomal DNA restriction digest fingerprints to specific and subspecific identification of Campylobacter isolates. J Clin Microbiol 1989; 27: 2338–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Owen, RJ, Beck, A. Evaluation of three procedures using a laser densitometer and microcomputer for estimating molecular sizes of restriction endonuclease digest fragments and application to Campylobacter jejuni chromosomal DNA. Lett Appl Microbiol 1987; 4: 58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Majewski, SIH, Goodwin, CS. Restriction endonuclease analysis of the genome of Campylobacter pylori with a rapid extraction method: evidence for considerable genomic variation. J Infect Dis 1988; 157: 465–71.Google ScholarPubMed
21.Simor, AE, Shames, B, Drumm, B et al. , Typing of Campylobacter pylori by bacterial DNA restriction endonuclease analysis and determination of plasmid profile. J Clin Microbiol 1990; 28: 83–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22.Oudbier, JH, Langenberg, W, Rauws, EAJ, Bruin–Mosch, C. Genotypical variation of Campylobacter pylori from gastric mucosa. J Clin Microbiol 1990; 28: 559–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23.Beji, A, Vincent, P, Dachis, I et al. , Evidence of gastritis with several Helicobacter pylori strains. Lancet 1989; II: 1402–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Shames, B, Krajden, S, Babida, C et al. , Investigation of Campylobacter pylori strains isolated from a husband and wife. In: Mégraud, F, Lamouliatte, H, eds. Gastroduodenal pathology and Campylobacter pylori. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1989: 439–42.Google Scholar
25.Owen, RJ. Chromosomal DNA fingerprinting – a new method of species and strain identification applicable to microbial pathogens. J Med Microbiol 1989; 30: 8999.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26.Owen, RJ, Hernandez, J, Bolton, F. DNA restriction digest and ribosomal DNA gene patterns of Campylobacter jejuni: a comparision with bio–, sero– and bacteriophage–types of United Kingdom outbreak strains. Epidemiol Infect 1990; 105: 265–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27.Owen, RJ, Bickley, J, Moreno, M et al. , Biotype and macromolecular profiles of cytotoxin– producing strains of Helicobacter pylori from antral gastric mucosa. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1991; 79: 199204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28.Owen, RJ, Figura, N, Moreno, M. Biotype and DNA fingerprints of cytotoxigenic Helicobacter pylori from patients with gastritis and peptic ulceration in Italy. Euro J Epidemiol 1991; in press.Google Scholar