Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T16:02:16.290Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Review of Current Theories regarding Immunity (Concluded)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

James Ritchie
Affiliation:
Reader in Pathology, University of Oxford.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Two questions. In concluding our review of this division of the subject, which deals with the parts played by the bodily presence of cellular protoplasm as contrasted with the activity of the chemical products of that protoplasm, which from their solubility may act at a distance from the cell producing them, there are two points which may be alluded to. Firstly, it is difficult to see how, granted that two substances are necessary for bactericidal action, these substances can in the first instance at least meet the bacterium except within a cell. Unless all immune bodies are represented in the serum by go-betweens (Zwischenkörper),—by bodies of an identical nature and differing only in that they are subservient to the normal metabolism of the body—how, when a bacterium gains entrance to the blood, does it come in contact with the immune body for which its protoplasm has the affinity? The receptor, which fixes the group in the bacterium corresponding with it, is within a cell,—how can the affinities be satisfied until the bacterium gets within the cell? It is not till the cell has been robbed of the use of these receptors and they become over-regenerated that the immune body becomes free and can be found in the serum. It is possible that all immune bodies are represented by go-betweens, and that a certain amount of the latter must be kept free in the serum for ordinary metabolism, and it is also possible that when the gradient—to use a physical phrase—between the cell and the blood plasma becomes great so far as the amount of go-betweens present in the latter is concerned that the cell becomes more active and secretes more of the material which is being more rapidly taken up than is usual in ordinary metabolism. Thus while the extra-cellular destruction of bacteria is easy to understand in the later steps of immunisation there is a difficulty about the earlier stages.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1902

References

(1)Metchnikoff, , Roux, , and Taurelli-Salimbeni, , Ann. de l'Institut Pasteur, 1896, vol. X., p. 257.Google Scholar
(2)Wassermann, , Deutsche med. Wochenschrift, 1897, No. 17.Google Scholar
(3)Brodie, , Journ. of Pathol. and Bacteriol., 1897, vol. IV., p. 460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(4)Nencki, and Sieber, , Zeitschr. f. physiolog. Chemie, vol. XXXII., p. 291.Google Scholar
(5)Ehrlich, , Die Werthbemessung des Diphtherie-Heilserums, Jena (Fischer, G.), 1897.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, , Deutsche med. Wochenschr. 1898, p. 597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrlich, , Croonian Lecture, Proc. Royal Soc. London, 18991900, vol. LXVI., p. 424.Google Scholar
(6)Weigert, , see Lubarsch und Ostertag, Ergebnisse der allgemeinen Pathologie, Jahrg. IV., 1897, p. 107.Google Scholar
(7)Buchner, , Münchener med. Wochenschr., 1893, pp. 449, 480.Google Scholar
(8)Calmette, , Le venin des serpents, p. 58.Google Scholar
(9)Wassermann, , Zeitschr. f. Hygiene, 1896, vol. XXII., p. 263.Google Scholar
(10)Martin, and Cherry, , Proc. Roy. Soc. London, 1898, vol. LXIII., p. 420.Google Scholar
(11)Knorr, , Münchener med. Wochenschr., vol. XLV., pp. 321, 362.Google Scholar
(12)Ehrlich, , Fortschritte der Medicin, vol. XV., p. 41.Google Scholar
(13)Morgenroth, , Centralbl. f. Bacteriol. u. Parasitenk., 1899, vol. XXVI., p. 349.Google Scholar
(14)Madsen, , Zeitschr. f. Hygiene, 1899, vol. XXXII., p. 214.Google Scholar
(15)Ehrlich, , Berliner klin. Wochenschr., 1898, No. 12.Google Scholar
(16)Bulloch, , Trans. of Jenner Inst., 1899, 2nd Series, p. 46.Google Scholar
(17)Dreyer, and Madsen, , Zeitschr. f. Hygiene, vol. XXXVII., p. 250.Google Scholar
(18)Ritchie, , Journ. of Hygiene, 1901, vol. I., p. 125.Google Scholar
(19)Dönitz, , Deutsche med. Wochenschr., 1897, No. 27, p. 428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dönitz, Arch. internat. de Pharmacodynamie,… v., p. 425.Google Scholar
(20)Heymans, , ref. in Ehrlich's Croonian Lecture.Google Scholar
(21)Wassermann, and Takaki, , Berliner klin. Wochenschr., 1898, p. 5.Google Scholar
(22)Knorr, , loc. cit. supra.Google Scholar
(23)Metchnikoff, , Ann. de l'Institut Pasteur, 1898, vol. XII., pp. 81, 263.Google Scholar
(24)Roux, and Borrel, , Ann. de l'Institut Pasteur, 1898, vol. XII., p. 225.Google Scholar
(25)Danysz, , Ann. de l'Institut Pasteur, 1899, vol. XIII., p. 156.Google Scholar
(26)Marie, , Ann. de l'Institut Pasteur, 1898, vol. XII., p. 91.Google Scholar
(27)Tizzoni, and Cattani, , Centralbl. f. Bacteriol. u. Parasitenk., 1891, vol. IX., p. 685.Google Scholar
(28)Vaillard, and Rouget, , Ann. de l'Institut Pasteur, 1892, vol. VI., p. 385.Google Scholar
(29)Ransom, , Deutsche med. Wochenschr., 1898, Jahrg. XXIV., p. 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(30)Buchner, , Münchener med. Wochenschr., 1897, p. 299.Google Scholar
(31)Dzierzgowski, , Arch. f. exp. Pathol. u. Pharmacol., 1897, vol. XXXVIII., p. 186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dzierzgowski, Arch. internat. de Pharmacodyn., vol. V., p. 1.Google Scholar
(32)Buchner, , Münchener med. Wochenschr., vol. XL., pp. 449, 480.Google Scholar
(33)Roux, and Vaillard, , Ann. de l'Institut Pasteur, 1893, vol. VII., p. 65.Google Scholar
(34)Salamonsen, and Madsen, , Ann. de l'Institut Pasteur, 1898, vol. XII., p. 763.Google Scholar
(35)Ritchie, , Lancet, 1901, vol. II., p. 81 (Rep. of Path. Soc. of London).Google Scholar
(36)Metchnikoft, , L'inflammation, Paris (Masson), 1892.Google Scholar
(37)Pfeiffer, and Issaeff, , Zeitschr. f. Hygiene, 1894, vol. XVIII., p. 355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfeiffer, , Zeitschr. f. Hygiene, 1894, vol. XVIII., p. 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfeiffer, and Issaeff, , Zeitschr. f. Hygiene, 1895, vol. XX., p. 198.Google Scholar
(38)Fraenkel, and Sobernheim, , Hygien. Rundschau, 1894, vol. IV., pp. 97, 145.Google Scholar
(39)Bordet, , Ann. de l'Institut Pasteur, 1895, vol. IX., p. 462.Google Scholar
(40)Bordet, , Ann. de l'Institut Pasteur, 1898, vol. XII., p. 688.Google Scholar
(41)Ehrlich, and Morgenroth, , Berl. klin. Wochenschr., 1899, pp. 6, 481Google Scholar
Ehrlich, and Morgenroth, , Berl. klin. Wochenschr., 1900, pp. 450, 681Google Scholar
Ehrlich, and Morgenroth, , Berl. klin. Wochenschr., 1901, pp. 251, 569, 598.Google Scholar
(42)Landsteiner, , Centralbl. f. Bacteriol. u. Parasitenk., 1899, vol. XXV., p. 546.Google Scholar
(43)Moxter, , Deutsche med. Wochenschr., 1900, Jahrg. XXVI., p. 61.Google Scholar
(44)Metchnikoff, , Ann. de l'Institut Pasteur, 1900, vol. XIV., p. 1.Google Scholar
(45)Metalnikoff, , Ann. de l'Institut Pasteur, 1900, XIV., p. 577.Google Scholar
(46)Metchnikoff, , Ann. de l'Institut Pasteur, 1899, vol. XIII., p. 737.Google Scholar
(47)Funck, , Centralbl. f. Bacteriol. u. Parasitenk., 1900, vol. XXVII., p. 670.Google Scholar
(48)Besredka, , Ann. de l'Institut Pasteur, 1900, vol. XIV., p. 391.Google Scholar
(49)von Dungern, , Münchener med. Wochenschr., 1899, p. 1288.Google Scholar
(50)Delézenne, , Compt. Rend. de l'Acad. des Sc., 1900, vol. CXXX., pp. 938, 1488.Google Scholar
(51)von Dungern, , Münchener med. Wochenschr., 1900, p. 677.Google Scholar
(52)Bordet, , Ann. de l'Institut Pasteur, 1900, vol. XIV., p. 257.Google Scholar
(53)Buchner, , Münchener med. Wochenschr., 1892, vol. XXXIX., p. 197.Google Scholar
(54)Bordet, , Ann. de l'Institut Pasteur, 1901, vol. XV., pp. 289, 303.Google Scholar
(55)Gruber, , Münchener med. Wochenschr., 1901, vol. XLVIII., pp. 1829, 1880, 1924, 1965.Google Scholar
(56)Walker, , Journ. of Hygiene, 1902, vol. II., p. 85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(57)Wassermann, , Deutsche med. Wochenschr., 1900, p. 285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(58)Massar, and Bordet, Ch., Soc. roy. d. Sciences médicales et naturelles de Bruxelles, 1890, vol. V.Google Scholar
(59)Gabritschewsky, , Ann. de l'Institut Pasteur, 1890, vol. IV., p. 346.Google Scholar
(60)Disselhorst, , Virchow's Archiv, 1888, vol. CXIII., p. 95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(61)Bordet, , Ann. de l'Institut Pasteur, 1896, vol. X., p. 104.Google Scholar
(62)Zilberberg, and Zeliony, , Ann. de l'Institut Pasteur, 1901, vol. XV., p. 615.Google Scholar
(63)Nuttall, , Zeitschr. f. Hygiene, 1888, vol. IV., p. 353Google Scholar
Nuttall, , Inaug. Dissert. Göttingen 1890.Google Scholar
(64)Wright, , Lancet, 1901, vol. I., p. 858.Google Scholar
(65)Gengou, , Ann. de l'Institut Pasteur, 1901, vol. XV., p. 232.Google Scholar
(66)Wassermann, , Zeitschr. f. Hygiene, 1901, vol. XXXVII., p. 173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(67)Besredka, , Ann. de l'Institut Pasteur, 1901, vol. XV., p. 209.Google Scholar
(68)Durham, , Journ. of Pathology, 1897, vol. IV., p. 338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(69)Roger, , Les Maladies infectieuses, Paris, 1902, p. 231.Google Scholar
(70)Pierallini, , Ann. de l'Institut Pasteur, 1897, vol. XI., p. 308.Google Scholar
(71)Pfeiffer, , Deutsche med. Wochenschr., 1896, vol. XXII., p. 120.Google Scholar
(72)Bordet, , in Metchnikoff's L'Immunité, 1901, p. 227.Google Scholar
(73)Denys, and Havet, , La Cellule, 1894, vol. X., p. 7.Google Scholar
(74)Havet, , La Cellule, p. 221.Google Scholar
(75)Denys, and Leclef, , La Cellule, 1895, vol. XI., p. 175.Google Scholar
(76)Deutsch, , Ann. de l'Institut Pasteur, 1899, vol. XIII. p. 689.Google Scholar
(77)Bulloch, , Centralbl. f. Bacteriol. u. Parasitenk., 1901, vol. XXIX., p. 725.Google Scholar
(78)Tarassévitch, , Ann. de l'Institut Pasteur, 1902, vol. XVI., p. 127.Google Scholar
(79)Walker, , Journ. of Pathology, 1901, vol. VII., p. 250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(80)Fraenkel, and Otto, , Münchener med. Wochenschr., 1894, p. 39.Google Scholar
(81)Pfeiffer, and Kolle, , Centralbl. f. Bacteriol. u. Parasitenk., 1896, vol. XX., p. 485.Google Scholar
(82)Widal, and Nobecourt, , Compt. rend. Soc. Biol., 1896, ser. 10, vol. IV., p. 842.Google Scholar
(83)Trumpp, , Archiv f. Hygiene, 1898, vol. XXXIII., p. 70.Google Scholar
(84)Malvoz, , Ann. de l'Institut Pasteur, 1899, vol. XIII., p. 630.Google Scholar
(85)Macrae, , Journ. Exper. Medicine, 1901, vol. V., p. 635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(86)Nicolle, , Ann. de l'Institut Pasteur, 1898, vol. XII., p. 161.Google Scholar
(87)Bordet, , Ann. de l'Institut Pasteur, 1899, vol. XIII., p. 225.Google Scholar
(88)Nolf, , Ann. de l'Institut Pasteur, 1900, vol. XIV., p. 297.Google Scholar
(89)Ramsden, , Journ. of Physiology, 1892, vol. XIV., p. 25.Google Scholar
(90)Delézenne, , in Metchnikoff's L'Immunité, 1901, p. 65.Google Scholar
(91)Fischer, , Zeitschr. f. Hygiene, 1900, vol. XXXV., p. 1.Google Scholar
(92)Bordet, , Ann. de l'Institut Pasteur, 1900, vol. XIV., p. 257.Google Scholar
(93)Gengou, , in Metchnikoff's L'Immunité, 1901, p. 324.Google Scholar
(94)Savtchenko, , Ann. de l'Institut Pasteur, 1902, vol. XVI., p. 106.Google Scholar
(95)Mesnil, , Ann. de l'Institut Pasteur, 1898, vol. XII., p. 461.Google Scholar
(96)Bordet, , Ann. de l'Institut Pasteur, 1895, vol. IX., p. 462.Google Scholar
(97)Metchnikoff, , Ann. de l'Institut Pasteur, 1897, vol. VII.Google Scholar
(98)Jennings, , Journ. of Physiology, 1897, vol. XXI., p. 258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(99)Roger, , Les Maladies infectieuses, Paris, 1902, p. 680et seq.Google Scholar
(100)Muir, , Journ. of Pathology, 1901, vol. VII., p. 161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muir, , Trans. Pathol. Soc., London, 1902.Google Scholar
(101)Neisser, and Wechsberg, , Münchener med. Wochenschr., 1901, vol. XLVIII., No. 18.Google Scholar
(102)Metchnikoff, , La Pathologie comparée de l'inflammation, Paris, 1901.Google Scholar
Metchnikoff, , L'Immunité dans les Maladies Infectieuses, Paris, 1901.Google Scholar
(103)Bordet, , Ann. de l'Institut Pasteur, 1899, vol. XIII., p. 225.Google Scholar
(104)Myers, , Lancet, 1900, vol. II., p. 98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(105)Bashford, , Journ. of Pathology, 1902, vol. VIII., p. 52.Google Scholar
(106)Ehrlich, , Deutsche med. Wochenschr., 1901, pp. 866, 888, 913Google Scholar
Specielle Pathologie und Therapie herausgegeben von Hofrath Prof. Dr Hermann Nothnagel, Band VIII. Erkrankungen des Blutes und der blutbildenden Organe,—Schlussbetrachtungen von Prof. Dr P. Ehrlich, Vienna, 1901.Google Scholar