Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T00:20:06.151Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The relative Abundance of Bacillus Coli Communis in River Water as an Index of the Self-Purification of Streams

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

Edwin Oakes Jordan
Edwin Oakes Jordan
Affiliation:
Associate Professor of Bacteriology in the University of Chicago.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

It is well known that fresh sewage always contains large numbers of the common colon bacillus. It is also true that when a water source is polluted with any considerable quantity of fresh sewage it is usually possible to demonstrate the presence of the colon bacillus in such water. Upon these familiar facts have been based various methods and conclusions of greater or less value to public hygiene.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 1 , Issue 3 , July 1901 , pp. 295 - 320
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1901

References

(1) Clark, H. W. Report of the State Board of Health of Massachusetts, 1898, p. 486, and 1899, p. 485.Google Scholar
(2) Freudenreich, E. von. Beitrag zur bakteriologischen Untersuchung des Wassers auf Colibakterien. Centralbl. f. Bakt., 1896, xx., p. 522.Google Scholar
(3) Fuller, G. W. Report on the Investigation into the Purification of the Ohio River Water for the Improved Water Supply of the City of Cincinnati, 1899, p. 41.Google Scholar
(4) Hammerl, H. Ueber das Vorkommen des Bakterium coli im Flusswasser. Hyg. Rundschau, 1897, vii., p. 529.Google Scholar
(5) Irons, E. E. Some Observations on Methods for the Detection of B. coli communis in Water. American Public Health Association Reports, 1900, xxvi.Google Scholar
(6) Jordan, E. O. Some Observations upon the Bacterial Self-Purification of Streams. Journal of Experimental Medicine, 1900, v., p. 271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(7) Jordan, E. O. and Irons, E. E. Notes on Bacterial Water Analysis. American Public Health Association Reports, 1899, xxv., p. 564.Google Scholar
(8) Smith, and Brown, Report on Mohawk and Hudson Rivers. Thirtieth Annual Report of the State Board of Health of New York, 1893, p. 680.Google Scholar