Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T06:29:58.170Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The relationship between ocular toxoplasmosis and levels of specific toxoplasma antibodies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 1999

D. J. CHAPMAN
Affiliation:
Scottish Toxoplasma Reference Laboratory, Microbiology Department, Raigmore Hospital NHS Trust, Inverness IV2 3UJ
D. ASHBURN
Affiliation:
Scottish Toxoplasma Reference Laboratory, Microbiology Department, Raigmore Hospital NHS Trust, Inverness IV2 3UJ
S. A. OGSTON
Affiliation:
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Medical School, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee
D. O. HO-YEN
Affiliation:
Scottish Toxoplasma Reference Laboratory, Microbiology Department, Raigmore Hospital NHS Trust, Inverness IV2 3UJ
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The relationship between ocular toxoplasmosis and levels of toxoplasma specific antibodies was examined in 195 patients. Using clinical information collected by questionnaires, patients were divided into: 97 with ocular toxoplasmosis (group 1) and 98 with ocular lesions not due to toxoplasma (group 2). The geometric mean of dye test titres (±S.D. natural log titre) in group 1 was 53·2 (±0·95) compared with 24·6 (±1·11) in group 2 (P<0·001). Young females tended to have more active lesions compared with young males (P<0·05). There was an age-dependent difference in dye test titres between the groups (P<0·001). Group 1 showed a decline in titre with age compared with an increase in group 2. Ocular toxoplasmosis was diagnosed most frequently among 21–30 year olds. More group 1 patients had dye test titres [ges ]65 iu/ml than group 2 (P<0·05). Dye test titres [ges ]65 iu/ml support a diagnosis of ocular toxoplasmosis whereas lower titres suggest other causes for eye lesions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1999 Cambridge University Press