Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T06:40:43.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Radial haemolysis for the detection of rubella antibody in acute postnatal rubella

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2010

P. Morgan-Capner
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Microbiology, King's College Hospital Medical School, London SE5 8RX
C. Burgess
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Microbiology, King's College Hospital Medical School, London SE5 8RX
S. Fisher-Hoch
Affiliation:
Department of Virology, St George's Hospital Medical School, London SW17 0QT
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

One hundred and forty-eight sera from 101 cases of acute postnatal rubella were examined by the radial haemolysis (RH) technique currently recommended by the Public Health Laboratory Service of the United Kingdom. In 75 cases the date of onset of rash was known. No sera were RH positive until the third day after the onset of rash and one serum was still negative at 9 days. By 10 days all sera gave a zone of at least 10 mm. The antibody response detected by RH appears later than that detected by haemagglutination inhibition (HI). Thirty-nine of the 101 cases could be diagnosed by seroconversion or a significant rise in titre using the HI test (diagnosis of the remainder depending upon rubella-specific IgM tests). Using the RH test this figure rises to 48 but in ten of these cases reliance on RH would have meant a delay in diagnosis. The results also indicate that many more sera would need to be tested for rubella-specific IgM if the RH test was used instead of the HI test for evaluating possible cases and contacts of rubella.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

References

REFERENCES

Champsaur, H., Dussaix, E. & Tournier, P. (1980). Haemagglutination inhibition, single radial hemolysis, and ELISA tests for the detection of IgG and IgM to rubella virus. Journal of Medical Virology 5, 273286.3.0.CO;2-J>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forger, J. M.& Gilfillan, R. F. (1979). Single-radial hemolysis as a cost-effective determinant of rubella antibody status. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 9, 115119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grillner, L. & Strannegard, O. (1976). Evaluation of the hemolysis-in-gel test for the screening of rubella immunity and the demonstration of recent infection. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 3, 8690.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harnett, G. B., Palmer, C. A. & Mackay-Scollay, E. M. (1979). Single-radial-hemolysis test for the assay of rubella antibody in antenatal, vaccinated, and rubella virus-infected patients. Journal of Infectious Diseases 140, 937944.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kurtz, J. B., Mortimer, P. P., Mortimer, P. R., Morgan-Capner, P., Shafi, M. S. & White, G. B. B. (1980). Rubella antibody measured by radial haemolysis. Characteristics and performance of a simple screening method for use in diagnostic laboratories. Journal of Hygiene 84, 213222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morgan-Capner, P., Davies, E. & Pattison, J. R. (1980). Rubella-specific TgM detection using Sephacryl S-300 gel filtration. Journal of Clinical Pathology 33, 10821085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan-Capner, P. & Pattison, J. R. (1981). Rubella. Hospital Update. March, 261268.Google Scholar
Public Health Laboratory Service Monograph Series, no. 16. Laboratory Investigation of Rubella (1982). London; Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Strannegard, Ö., Grillner, L. & Lindberg, I. (1975). Hemolysis-in-gel test for the demonstration of antibodies to rubella virus. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1, 491494.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Väänänen, P. & Vaheri, A. (1979). Hemolysis-in-gel test in immunity surveys and diagnosis of rubella. Journal of Medical Virology 3, 245252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed