Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T15:19:40.679Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Protective isolation in single-bed rooms: studies in a modified hospital ward

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

G. A. J. Ayliffe ,
B. J. Collins ,
E. J. L. Lowbury  and
Mary Wall
G. A. J. Ayliffe
Affiliation:
Hospital Infection Research Laboratory, Summerfield Hospital, Birmingham 18 and Department of Statistics, Birmingham Regional Hospital Board
B. J. Collins
Affiliation:
Hospital Infection Research Laboratory, Summerfield Hospital, Birmingham 18 and Department of Statistics, Birmingham Regional Hospital Board
E. J. L. Lowbury
Affiliation:
Hospital Infection Research Laboratory, Summerfield Hospital, Birmingham 18 and Department of Statistics, Birmingham Regional Hospital Board
Mary Wall
Affiliation:
Hospital Infection Research Laboratory, Summerfield Hospital, Birmingham 18 and Department of Statistics, Birmingham Regional Hospital Board
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Studies were made in a modified hospital ward containing 19 beds, 14 of them in the open ward, one in a window-ventilated side-room, two in rooms with partial-recirculation ventilators giving 7–10 air changes per hour, and two in self-contained isolation suites with plenum ventilation (20 air changes per hour), ultra-violet (UV) barriers at doorways and airlocks.

Preliminary tests with aerosols of tracer bacteria showed that few bacteria entered the plenum or recirculation-ventilated rooms. Bacteria released inside mechanically ventilated cubicles escaped into the corridor, but this transfer was reduced by the presence of an airlock. UV barriers at the entrance to the airlock and the cubicle reduced the transfer of bacteria from cubicle to corridor.

During a period of 4 years while the ward was in use for surgical and gynaecological patients, the incidence of post-operative sepsis and colonization of wounds by multiple-resistant Staphylococcus aureus was lower (though not significantly lower) in the plenum-ventilated rooms than in the open ward, the recirculator-ventilated cubicles and the window-ventilated cubicles. Nasal acquisition of multiple-resistant Staph. aureus was significantly less common in the plenum-ventilated than in the recirculator-ventilated cubicles and in the other areas. Mean counts of bacteria on settle-plates were significantly lower in the plenum-ventilated cubicles than in the other areas; mean settle-plate counts in the recirculator-ventilated cubicles were significantly lower than in the open ward and in the window-ventilated side-room; similar results were shown by slit-sampling of air. Mean settle-plate counts were significantly lower in all areas when the ward was occupied by female patients. Staph. aureus was rarely carried by air from plenum-ventilated or other cubicles to the open ward, or from the open ward to the cubicles; though staphylococci were transferred from one floor area to another, they did not appear to be redispersed into the air in sufficient numbers to infect the patients. Ultra-violet irradiation caused a significant reduction in the total and staphylococcal counts from the floors of airlocks, and a significant reduction of total counts in the air.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 69 , Issue 4 , December 1971 , pp. 511 - 527
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1971

References

REFERENCES

Ayliffe, G. A. J. (1963). Staphylococcal cross-infection in Surgical Wards. M.D. Thesis Bristol University.Google Scholar
Ayliffe, G. A. J., Collins, B. J., Lowbury, E. J. L., Babb, J. H. & Lilly, H. A. (1967). Ward floors and other surfaces as reservoirs of hospital infection. Journal of Hygiene 65, 515.Google ScholarPubMed
Barber, M. & Kuper, S. W. A. (1951). Identification of Staph. pyogenes by the phosphatase reaction. Journal of Pathology and Bacteriology 63, 65.Google Scholar
Bethune, D. W., Blowers, R., Parker, M. & Pask, S. A. (1965). Dispersal of Staph. aureus by patients and surgical staff. Lancet i, 480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blair, J. E. & Williams, R. E. O. (1961). Phage typing of staphylococci. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 24, 771.Google ScholarPubMed
Burke, J. F. (1970). Clinical value of a bacteria-free patient-care unit. In Third International Symposium on Aerobiology, p. 157. Ed. Silver, I. H.. London, New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Cason, J. S., Jackson, D. M., Lowbury, E. J. L. & Ricketts, C. R. (1966). Antiseptic and aseptic prophylaxis for burns: use of silver nitrate and of isolators. British Medical Journal ii, 1288.Google Scholar
Davidson, A. I. G., Smylie, H. G., MacDonald, A. & Smith, G. (1971). Ward design in relation to post-operative wound infection Part II. British Medical Journal i, 72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edmunds, P. N. (1970). Staphylococcal infection in subdivided general surgical wards. Journal of Hygiene 68, 531.Google Scholar
Emslie, J. A. (1966). Dispersal of Staphylococcus aureus. Lancet i, 660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, W. D. (1960). Environmental Staphylococcal contamination: A study by a new method. Lancet i, 670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, L. B. & Hartnett, M. J. (1964). Measurement of the bacterial contamination on surfaces in hospitals. Public Health Reports, Washington 79, 1021.Google Scholar
Lack, C. H., Towers, A. G. & Stevenson, F. H. (1962). Cross-infection: its control in an orthopaedic hospital by means of a cubicled isolation ward. Lancet i, 1228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lidwell, O. M., Polakoff, S., Davies, J., Hewitt, J. H., Shooter, R. A., Walker, K. A., Gaya, H. & Taylor, G. W. (1970). Nasal acquisition of Staphylococcus aureus in a subdivided and mechanically ventilated ward: endemic prevalence of a single Staphylococcal strain. Journal of Hygiene 68, 417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowbury, E. J. L. (1954). Air-conditioning with filtered air for dressing burns. Lancet i, 292.Google Scholar
Lowbury, E. J. L. (1970). Controlled trials of patient-isolation in a burns unit. Third International Symposium on Aerobiology, p. 131. Ed. Silver, I. H.. London and New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lowbury, E. J. L., Babb, J. R. & Ford, P. M. (1971). Protective isolation in a burns unit: the use of plastic isolators and air curtains. Journal of Hygiene 69, 529.Google Scholar
May, K. R. (1949). An improved spinning top homogeneous spray apparatus. Journal of Applied Physics 20, 932.Google Scholar
Robertson, A. C., Lynch, J., Kay, H. E. M., Jameson, B., Guyer, R. J. & Evans, I. L. (1968). Design and use of plastic tents for isolation of patients prone to infection. Lancet ii, 1376.Google Scholar
Smylie, R. G., Davidson, A. I. G., MacDonald, A. & Smith, G. (1971). Ward design in relation to post-operative wound infection Part I. British Medical Journal i, 67.Google Scholar
Topley, E., Lowbury, E. J. L. & Hurst, L. (1951). Bacteriological control of aureomycin therapy. Lancet i, 87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, G. C., Watson, D. C. & Abbott, J. D. (1965). An isolation ward for patients with Staphylococcal sepsis. Lancet ii, 426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whyte, W., Howie, J. G. R. & Eakin, J. E. (1969). Bacteriological observations in a mechanically ventilated experimental ward and in two open-plan wards. Journal of Medical Microbiology 2, 335.Google Scholar
Williams, R. E. O., Noble, W. C., Jevons, P. M., Lidwell, O. M., Shooter, R. A., White, R. G., Thom, B. T. & Taylor, G. W. (1962). Isolation for the control of Staphylococcal infection in surgical wards. British Medical Journal ii, 275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar