Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T15:20:14.603Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Prevalence of Burkholderia pseudomallei in Guangxi, China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2009

G. MA
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Virology, Wuhan Institute of Virology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, China Graduate School of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
D. ZHENG
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Virology, Wuhan Institute of Virology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, China
Q. CAI
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Virology, Wuhan Institute of Virology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, China
Z. YUAN*
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Virology, Wuhan Institute of Virology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, China
*
*Author for correspondence: Dr Zhiming Yuan, Wuhan Institute of Virology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China. (Email: [email protected])
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Melioidosis, an infectious disease caused by the Gram-negative bacterium Burkholderia pseudomallei, is now recognized as an important public health problem in Southeast Asia and tropical northern Australia. Although B. pseudomallei has been detected in various water and soil samples in southeast China, the enviromental distribution of B. pseudomallei in China is unclear. In the winter months of 2007, 154 and 130 soil and water samples, respectively, were collected from several locations in Guangxi, China. The samples were screened for B. pseudomallei by bacterial culture and identification and confirmed by PCR for species-specific 16S rDNA and flagellin genes. B. pseudomallei was detected in 8·4% of the soil samples but in none of the water samples. All positive samples were confined to a single low-lying region from rice paddy fields. Counts of B. pseudomallei ranged from 23 to 521 c.f.u./g soil. This is the first geographical distribution survey of B. pseudomallei in soil in Guangxi, China, and the data are of importance for further evaluating the impact of this pathogen on melioidosis in this region.

Type
Short Report
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Burkholderia pseudomallei is a Gram-negative bacterium naturally occurring in rice-farming fields, rubber plantations, agricultural sites and water in endemic regions, particularly Southeast Asia and northern Australia [Reference Raja, Ahmed and Singh1]. It is the causative agent of meliodosis, a potentially acute fulminating disease in animals and humans with the clinical syndromes varying from bacteraemia, pneumonia, skin or soft tissue infection, and brain, splenic and liver abscesses; pneumonia is the most common presentation and is involved in about half of all cases [Reference Cheng and Currie2]. Most cases of melioidosis occur within latitudes 20° N and 20° S [Reference Dance3], and may account for 20% of all community-acquired septicaemias and 20–40% of sepsis-related mortality in northeast Thailand and Australia [Reference Wiersinga4, Reference Currie5].

The first human case of melioidosis in China was reported in Hong Kong in 1983 [Reference So6], followed by five cases a year later [Reference So7]. A seroprevalence survey in Hong Kong showed 14% seroconversion in a tuberculosis sanatorium in 1987 [Reference So8], and since these cases had never travelled outside Hong Kong the infections were regarded as being acquired locally. On mainland China, probably due to unawareness of melioidosis, it was not until 1990 that the first human case was diagnosed in Hainan, a southernmost province [Reference Li9], and subsequently some animal and human cases were reported in Guangdong, Guangxi and Hainan [Reference Wiersinga4].

A seroprevalence study of antibody responses to B. pseudomallei in humans and animals undertaken in 1979 in Nanning, Guangxi showed that the seropositive rate in humans was lower than that in animals (9·7% for humans vs. 34% in cattle and 15% in pigs). B. pseudomallei has routinely been isolated since 1975 from clinical samples in Guangxi, but there is limited information on the geographic distribution of this species in the region. To this end we undertook a survey of the distribution of B. pseudomallei in soil and water sites throughout this region.

In total, 274 soil and water samples were collected from 77 sites mainly in the rice field regions in Guangxi in the winter of 2007 (Fig. 1). About 10 g soil was sampled at a depth of 30–60 cm and placed into a sterile plastic bag; each site was sampled from two separate holes at the same time. Water samples were 10 ml volumes of pond surface water collected in sterile plastic tubes. All samples were stored in an ice box for transportation to the laboratory. About 5 g soil was shaken vigorously in 2 ml distilled water in sterile screw-capped glass vials; 1 ml water sample was added to 9 ml selective enrichment broth consisting of threonine-basal salt plus colistin (TBSS-C50 broth) [Reference Galimand and Dodin10] and incubated at 42°C for 48 h. One drop of soil suspension or 10 μl of the 48-h water enrichment culture were spread on Ashdown's agar. The plates were incubated at 42°C for 6 days and isolates with dry, wrinkled, violet to purple colonies were regarded as presumptive B. pseudomallei, and were stored in Luria–Bertani broth containing 15% glycerol at −70°C for further identification. For quantitative culture, 5 g soil was shaken in 5 ml water and 10- and 100-μl aliquots were plated on Ashdown's agar as above. All presumptive B. pseudomallei isolates were identified by phenotypic tests [Reference Walsh and Wuthiekanun11], and confirmed by PCR amplification of the fliC and 16S rDNA genes as described by Su et al. [Reference Su12]. The 16S rDNA amplicon was sequenced and the phylogenetic relatedness to the reference strain B. pseudomallei strain (CMCC 53001) was displayed by the Neighbour-Joining arithmetic method.

Fig. 1. Map illustrating soil sampling sites in Guangxi, China.

B. pseudomallei was detected in 13/154 (8·4%) soil samples, and seven sampling sites (9·1%) (Fig. 1). It was not found in any of the surface water samples. Counts of B. pseudomallei in the soil samples ranged from 23 to 521 c.f.u./g. Isolates identified by phenotypic tests were positive for fliC and 16S rDNA genes. Sequencing of the latter revealed high similarity to the reference strain.

There was an uneven distribution of B. pseudomallei in Guangxi. Four of the seven positive sites were located in coastal areas (Qinzhou, Beihai, Fangcheng) and the remainder to the south of Nanning city, a plain of rice fields <200 m above sea level (latitude 23·5° N). No positive sample was identified in mountainous regions in the north and west (Fig. 1) and no B. pseudomallei were detected in samples from Chongzuo where cases of melioidosis have been reported. The geographical distribution of B. pseudomallei is possibly affected by several factors including altitude, rainfall, and temperature and local ecological conditions; indeed 11 negative sampling sites were located close to seven positive sites.

The bacterial counts in the soil are probably related to the risk of developing melioidosis. The concentrations of B. pseudomallei in soil (23–521 c.f.u./g) were comparable to levels found in studies in Thailand (1–17 000) and Laos (10–1200) [Reference Smith13, Reference Lee, Wang and Yap14]. Previous antibody prevalence surveys to B. pseudomallei in animals and humans reported rates of 9·7% in Nanning and 1·8% in Guilin [Reference Li15]. This is consistent with the fact that one-third of the sites around Nanning cultured positive for B. pseudomallei while Guilin region yielded no positive isolations.

Recreational or occupational exposure to soil and water contaminated with B. pseudomallei are recognized risk factors for contracting melioidosis [Reference Suputtamongkol16]. Although no cases have yet been reported in Guangxi, physicians in this area should consider melioidosis when patients present with an unknown fever or community-acquired pneumonia. Special attention should be given to seropositive individuals as the pathogen may persist in humans for very long periods and be reactivated leading to relapse, especially among immunocompromised individuals, in whom the disease can be fatal [Reference Su12, Reference Currie17].

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Mr Yan Jianping and Wang Jianzhou for technical assistance. The project was supported by a grant (24GFCX-YJ-2306) from the Chinese Academy of Sciences.

DECLARATION OF INTEREST

None.

References

REFERENCES

1. Raja, NS, Ahmed, MZ, Singh, NN. Melioidosis: an emerging infectious disease. Postgraduate Medical Journal 2005; 51: 140145.Google ScholarPubMed
2. Cheng, AC, Currie, BJ. Melioidosis: epidemiology, pathophysiology, and management. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 2005; 18: 383416.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Dance, DA. Melioidosis as an emerging global problem. Acta Tropica 2000; 74: 115119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Wiersinga, WJ, et al. Melioidosis: insights into the pathogenicity of Burkholderia pseudomallei. Nature Reviews Microbiology 2006; 4: 272282.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Currie, BJ, et al. Endemic melioidosis in tropical northern Australia: a 10-year prospective study and review of the literature. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2000; 31: 981986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. So, SY, et al. Successful treatment of melioidosis caused by a multiresistant strain in an immunocompromised host with third generation cephalosporins. American Review of Respiratory Diseases 1983; 127: 650654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. So, SY, et al. First report of septicaemic melioidosis in Hong Kong. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 1984; 78: 456459.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. So, SY, et al. Melioidosis: a serological survey in a tuberculosis sanatorium in Hong Kong. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 1987; 81: 10171019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Li, L, et al. First report of human melioidosis and its serological prevalence in Hainan Island. Chinese Journal of Zoonoses 1990; 6: 3839.Google Scholar
10. Galimand, M, Dodin, A. Focus on melioidosis throughout the world. Bulletin Société Pathologie Exotique Filiales 1982; 75: 375383.Google ScholarPubMed
11. Walsh, AL, Wuthiekanun, V. The laboratory diagnosis of melioidosis. British Journal of Biomedical Science 1996; 53: 249253.Google ScholarPubMed
12. Su, HP, et al. Prevalence of melioidosis in the Er-Ren River Basin, Taiwan: implications for transmission. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2007; 45: 25992603.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Smith, MD, et al. Quantitative recovery of Burkholderia pseudomallei from soil in Thailand. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 1995; 89: 488490.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Lee, MA, Wang, D, Yap, EH. Detection and differentiation of Burkholderia pseudomallei, Burkholderia mallei and Burkholderia thailandensis by multiplex PCR. FEMS Immunology and Medical Microbiology 2005; 43: 413417.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Li, L, et al. Investigation of endemic areas of melioidosis. Chinese Journal of Preventive Medicine 1981; 15: 15.Google Scholar
16. Suputtamongkol, Y, et al. Risk factors for melioidosis and bacteremic melioidosis. Clinical Infectious Diseases 1999; 29: 408413.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Currie, BJ, et al. Melioidosis: acute and chronic disease, relapse and re-activation. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 2000; 94: 301304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Map illustrating soil sampling sites in Guangxi, China.