Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T12:21:17.474Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Preservation of Bacteria by Drying in Peptone Plugs*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

D. I. Annear
D. I. Annear
Affiliation:
Department of Pathology, University of Cambridge
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. A new method for the preservation of bacteria by drying is described.

2. Marked differences between organisms were found with respect to the relationship between growth phase and recoveries after drying.

3. Recoveries of several strains of neisseriae and vibrios, both immediately after drying and after storage, were considerably higher than any previously recorded for similar species of these genera.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 54 , Issue 4 , December 1956 , pp. 487 - 508
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1956

References

Annear, D. I. (1954). Preservation of bacteria. Nature, Lond., 174, 359.Google Scholar
Annear, D. I. (1956). Freeze-drying. Part III. The preservation of micro-organisms. Lab. Practice, 5, 102.Google Scholar
Collier, L. H. (1955). The development of a stable smallpox vaccine. J. Hyg., Camb., 53, 76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dubos, R. J. (1949). The Bacterial Cell. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Frobisher, M., Parsons, E. I., Pai, S. E. & Hakim, S. (1947). A simplified method for the preservation of bacteria by desiccation in vacuo. J. Lab. clin. Med. 32, 1008.Google ScholarPubMed
Fry, R. M. (1954). The preservation of bacteria. In Biological Application of Freezing and Drying, edited by Harris, R. J. C.. New York: Academic Press Inc.Google Scholar
Fry, R. M. & Greaves, R. I. N. (1951). The survival of bacteria during and after drying. J. Hyg., Camb., 49, 220.Google ScholarPubMed
Greaves, R. I. N. (1954). Theoretical aspects of drying by vacuum sublimation. In Biological Applications of Freezing and Drying, edited by Harris, R. J. C.. New York: Academic Press Inc.Google Scholar
GreIff, D. & Pinkerton, H. (1954). The effects on biological materials of freezing and drying by vacuum sublimation. I. Development and testing of the apparatus. J. exp. Med. 100, 81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hegarty, C. P. & Weeks, O. B. (1940). Sensitivity of Escherichia coli to cold shock during the logarithmic growth phase. J. Bact. 39, 475.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heller, G. (1941). A quantitative study of the environmental factors involved in survival and death of bacteria in the desiccated state. J. Bact. 41, 109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hutton, R. S., Hilmoe, R. J. & Roberts, J. L. (1951). Some physical factors that influence the survival of Brucella abortus during freeze-drying. J. Bact. 61, 309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miles, A. A. & Misra, S. S. (1938). Estimation of the bactericidal power of blood. J. Hyg., Camb., 38, 732.Google Scholar
Naylor, H. B. & Smith, P. A. (1946). Factors affecting the viability of Serratia marcescens during dehydration and storage. J. Bact. 52, 565.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Proom, H. & Hemmons, L. M. (1949). The drying and preservation of bacterial cultures. J. gen. Microbiol. 3, 7.Google Scholar
Record, B. R. & Taylor, R. (1953). Some factors influencing the survival of Bacterium coli on freeze-drying. J. gen. Microbiol. 9, 475.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snyder, T. L. (1947). The relative errors of bacteriological plate-counting methods. J. Bact. 54, 641.Google Scholar
Stamp, Lord (1947). The preservation of bacteria by drying. J. gen. Microbiol. 1, 251.Google Scholar